Cards like Slither Blade
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Slither Blade 28%
- Triton Shorestalker 21%
- Invisible Stalker 19%
- Gudul Lurker 13%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 11%
- Jhessian Infiltrator 4%
- Phantom Warrior 2%
- Mystic of the Hidden Way 1%
- Metathran Soldier 1%
- Covert Operative 1%
- Phantom Ninja 1%
Other options: Hazy Homunculus, Tidal Kraken, Talas Warrior, Plasma Elemental, Latch Seeker
Cards like Elvish Refueler
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Birds of Paradise
7.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Birds of Paradise 28%
- Maraleaf Pixie 26%
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bident of Thassa
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 32%
- Elvish Mystic 25%
- Fyndhorn Elves 18%
- Gyre Engineer 4%
- Boreal Druid 2%
- Nantuko Elder 1%
- Fyndhorn Elder 1%
- Druid of the Cowl 1%
- Goobbue Gardener 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Golden Hind, Wirewood Elf, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 35%
- Negate 30%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Remove Soul 1%
- Wild Unraveling 1%
Other options: Intervene, Wash Away, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Silent Hallcreeper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cold-Eyed Selkie
6.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 20%
- Lightning Greaves 18%
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 41%
- Rampant Growth 39%
- Kodama's Reach 29%
- Shared Roots 4%
- Search for Tomorrow 4%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Migration Path 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Map the Wastes 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Roamer's Routine, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Aetherize
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 21%
- Perplexing Test 5%
- Evacuation 1%
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
7.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Oashra Cultivator, Embodiment of Spring
All top picks (50)
- Elvish Refueler relevance 0.85 · 41.2% (77 of 187 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.70 · 26.7% (50 of 187 decks)
- Rangers' Aetherhive relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (23 of 187 decks)
- Rangers' Refueler relevance 0.68 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.49 · 27.8% (52 of 187 decks)
- Afterburner Expert relevance 0.63 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.44 · 33.2% (62 of 187 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.46 · 25.7% (48 of 187 decks)
- Sabotage Strategist relevance 0.59 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Greenbelt Guardian relevance 0.55 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Stampeding Scurryfoot relevance 0.55 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.54 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Skystreak Engineer relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.42 · 19.3% (36 of 187 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (40 of 187 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.49 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Flood the Engine relevance 0.48 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Nimble Thopterist relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Camera Launcher relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.34 · 29.9% (56 of 187 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.38 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.33 · 25.7% (48 of 187 decks)
- Veloheart Bike relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.31 · 24.6% (46 of 187 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.38 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.39 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 26.7% (50 of 187 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.43 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 12.3% (23 of 187 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Trip Up relevance 0.45 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.39 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Elvish Refueler relevance 0.85 · 41.2% (77 of 187 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.70 · 26.7% (50 of 187 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.49 · 27.8% (52 of 187 decks)
- Afterburner Expert relevance 0.63 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.44 · 33.2% (62 of 187 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.46 · 25.7% (48 of 187 decks)
- Sabotage Strategist relevance 0.59 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Greenbelt Guardian relevance 0.55 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Stampeding Scurryfoot relevance 0.55 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Skystreak Engineer relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.42 · 19.3% (36 of 187 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (40 of 187 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.49 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Nimble Thopterist relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Camera Launcher relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.34 · 29.9% (56 of 187 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.38 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.33 · 25.7% (48 of 187 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.31 · 24.6% (46 of 187 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.39 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 26.7% (50 of 187 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 12.3% (23 of 187 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.39 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.30 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Azure Beastbinder relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Elusive Otter // Grove's Bounty relevance 0.30 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Loxodon Surveyor relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.23 · 39.0% (73 of 187 decks)
- Glitch Ghost Surveyor relevance 0.46 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.25 · 29.9% (56 of 187 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.31 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Wind Rider relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.26 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.29 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.23 · 32.1% (60 of 187 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.33 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Rangers' Aetherhive relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (23 of 187 decks)
- Rangers' Refueler relevance 0.68 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.54 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Veloheart Bike relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.28 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Guidelight Matrix relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Midnight Mangler relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.29 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Lifecraft Engine relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.24 · 13.9% (26 of 187 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Possession Engine relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.19 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Starting Column relevance 0.34 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Deluxe Dragster relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Earthrumbler relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.15 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Dragon Throne of Tarkir relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.13 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Flood the Engine relevance 0.48 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.43 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.34 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.29 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.26 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.23 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.24 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.20 · 21.9% (41 of 187 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.18 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.19 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.16 · 28.9% (54 of 187 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
All instants (50)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.38 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Trip Up relevance 0.45 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (52 of 187 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.24 · 13.9% (26 of 187 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.21 · 20.9% (39 of 187 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.19 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 29.9% (56 of 187 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Run Over relevance 0.35 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.19 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.19 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 29.4% (55 of 187 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.14 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.16 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Stall Out relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Plow Through relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 39.0% (73 of 187 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 29.4% (55 of 187 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 24.1% (45 of 187 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 23.5% (44 of 187 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 40.6% (76 of 187 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.15 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 29.4% (55 of 187 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.40 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Wild Roads relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Reef Roads relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Balamb Garden, SeeD Academy // Balamb Garden, Airborne relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 14.4% (27 of 187 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.14 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.11 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.12 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.11 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
All lands (50)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.18 · 31.6% (59 of 187 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.19 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.14 · 28.3% (53 of 187 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.14 · 20.9% (39 of 187 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.15 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.15 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.10 · 32.6% (61 of 187 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.14 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 31.0% (58 of 187 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 39.6% (74 of 187 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 27.8% (52 of 187 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 34.8% (65 of 187 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 33.7% (63 of 187 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 34.8% (65 of 187 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 42.2% (79 of 187 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 65.2% (122 of 187 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 86.6% (162 of 187 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sita Varma, Masked Racer, from 187 real Commander decks.