Cards like Slither Blade
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Slither Blade 28%
- Triton Shorestalker 21%
- Invisible Stalker 19%
- Gudul Lurker 13%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 11%
- Jhessian Infiltrator 4%
- Phantom Warrior 2%
- Mystic of the Hidden Way 1%
- Metathran Soldier 1%
- Covert Operative 1%
- Phantom Ninja 1%
Other options: Hazy Homunculus, Tidal Kraken, Talas Warrior, Plasma Elemental, Latch Seeker
Cards like Elvish Refueler
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Birds of Paradise
7.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Birds of Paradise 28%
- Maraleaf Pixie 26%
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
8.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bident of Thassa
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 32%
- Elvish Mystic 25%
- Fyndhorn Elves 18%
- Gyre Engineer 4%
- Boreal Druid 2%
- Nantuko Elder 1%
- Fyndhorn Elder 1%
- Druid of the Cowl 1%
- Goobbue Gardener 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Golden Hind, Wirewood Elf, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 35%
- Negate 30%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Remove Soul 1%
- Wild Unraveling 1%
Other options: Intervene, Wash Away, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Silent Hallcreeper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cold-Eyed Selkie
6.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 20%
- Lightning Greaves 18%
Cards like Cultivate
1.04× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 40%
- Rampant Growth 39%
- Kodama's Reach 29%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Search for Tomorrow 4%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Migration Path 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Map the Wastes 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Roamer's Routine, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Aetherize
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 21%
- Perplexing Test 5%
- Evacuation 1%
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
7.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Oashra Cultivator, Embodiment of Spring
All top picks (50)
- Elvish Refueler relevance 0.85 · 41.5% (78 of 188 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.70 · 26.6% (50 of 188 decks)
- Rangers' Aetherhive relevance 0.67 · 12.2% (23 of 188 decks)
- Rangers' Refueler relevance 0.68 · 10.6% (20 of 188 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.49 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.45 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Afterburner Expert relevance 0.63 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.46 · 25.5% (48 of 188 decks)
- Sabotage Strategist relevance 0.59 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Greenbelt Guardian relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Stampeding Scurryfoot relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (21 of 188 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Skystreak Engineer relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.42 · 19.1% (36 of 188 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.40 · 22.9% (43 of 188 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.40 · 21.3% (40 of 188 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.49 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Flood the Engine relevance 0.48 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Nimble Thopterist relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Camera Launcher relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.34 · 29.8% (56 of 188 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (31 of 188 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.33 · 25.5% (48 of 188 decks)
- Veloheart Bike relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (23 of 188 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.31 · 24.5% (46 of 188 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.38 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (24 of 188 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.38 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.43 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (23 of 188 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.39 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.28 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Elvish Refueler relevance 0.85 · 41.5% (78 of 188 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.70 · 26.6% (50 of 188 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.49 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.45 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Afterburner Expert relevance 0.63 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.46 · 25.5% (48 of 188 decks)
- Sabotage Strategist relevance 0.59 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Greenbelt Guardian relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Stampeding Scurryfoot relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Skystreak Engineer relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.42 · 19.1% (36 of 188 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.40 · 22.9% (43 of 188 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.40 · 21.3% (40 of 188 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.49 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Nimble Thopterist relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Camera Launcher relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.34 · 29.8% (56 of 188 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (31 of 188 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.33 · 25.5% (48 of 188 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.31 · 24.5% (46 of 188 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (24 of 188 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (23 of 188 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.39 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.30 · 18.1% (34 of 188 decks)
- Azure Beastbinder relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Elusive Otter // Grove's Bounty relevance 0.30 · 18.1% (34 of 188 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Loxodon Surveyor relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.23 · 38.8% (73 of 188 decks)
- Glitch Ghost Surveyor relevance 0.46 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.31 · 11.2% (21 of 188 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.25 · 29.8% (56 of 188 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.31 · 11.7% (22 of 188 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Wind Rider relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.28 · 14.9% (28 of 188 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.26 · 18.6% (35 of 188 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.29 · 11.2% (21 of 188 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.28 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.23 · 31.9% (60 of 188 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.33 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Rangers' Aetherhive relevance 0.67 · 12.2% (23 of 188 decks)
- Rangers' Refueler relevance 0.68 · 10.6% (20 of 188 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Veloheart Bike relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.28 · 19.7% (37 of 188 decks)
- Guidelight Matrix relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Midnight Mangler relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.29 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Lifecraft Engine relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (27 of 188 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Possession Engine relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.19 · 17.0% (32 of 188 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Starting Column relevance 0.34 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Deluxe Dragster relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Earthrumbler relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 17.6% (33 of 188 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (35 of 188 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 19.7% (37 of 188 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Dragon Throne of Tarkir relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.13 · 16.0% (30 of 188 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Flood the Engine relevance 0.48 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (23 of 188 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.38 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.43 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.28 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.29 · 11.2% (21 of 188 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.23 · 17.0% (32 of 188 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.25 · 11.2% (21 of 188 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.24 · 11.7% (22 of 188 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.20 · 21.8% (41 of 188 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.18 · 22.9% (43 of 188 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.16 · 29.3% (55 of 188 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.19 · 17.0% (32 of 188 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
All instants (50)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (21 of 188 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.38 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.28 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Trip Up relevance 0.45 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.24 · 13.8% (26 of 188 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.21 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.20 · 22.9% (43 of 188 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.22 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 29.8% (56 of 188 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Run Over relevance 0.35 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.19 · 11.2% (21 of 188 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.19 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 23.4% (44 of 188 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 18.1% (34 of 188 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.19 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 29.3% (55 of 188 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.14 · 18.6% (35 of 188 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.16 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Stall Out relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Plow Through relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 17.0% (32 of 188 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 38.8% (73 of 188 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (14 of 188 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 29.3% (55 of 188 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 23.9% (45 of 188 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 23.4% (44 of 188 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 40.4% (76 of 188 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.15 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 29.8% (56 of 188 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.40 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Wild Roads relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Reef Roads relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Balamb Garden, SeeD Academy // Balamb Garden, Airborne relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 14.4% (27 of 188 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 22.9% (43 of 188 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 11.7% (22 of 188 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 188 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.14 · 11.7% (22 of 188 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 10.6% (20 of 188 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.11 · 19.7% (37 of 188 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.12 · 9.0% (17 of 188 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.11 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 6.9% (13 of 188 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 20.2% (38 of 188 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
All lands (50)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.18 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.19 · 19.1% (36 of 188 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (15 of 188 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (12 of 188 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.14 · 28.7% (54 of 188 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.14 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 17.6% (33 of 188 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (19 of 188 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 18.1% (34 of 188 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.15 · 13.8% (26 of 188 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 13.8% (26 of 188 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.15 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.10 · 32.4% (61 of 188 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.14 · 8.5% (16 of 188 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 18.6% (35 of 188 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 30.9% (58 of 188 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 39.9% (75 of 188 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 34.6% (65 of 188 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 188 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 9.6% (18 of 188 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (11 of 188 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (8 of 188 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 34.6% (65 of 188 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 188 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 42.6% (80 of 188 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 65.4% (123 of 188 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sita Varma, Masked Racer, from 188 real Commander decks.