Change per day
Archetypes
90% of decks lean toward it
53% of decks lean toward it
22% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Ioreth of the Healing House
90% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Fblthp, Lost on the Range
53% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Thrasios, Triton Hero
22% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Academy Ruins
18% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Magus of the Candelabra
17% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 78 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Prismite
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Prismite 58%
- Stonework Packbeast 55%
- Signpost Scarecrow 24%
- Mystic Skull // Mystic Monstrosity 2%
- Pili-Pala 2%
Other options: Three Tree Mascot, Scarecrow Guide, Shire Scarecrow, Salvaged Manaworker
Cards like Prophet of Distortion
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Kiora's Follower
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kiora's Follower 55%
- Ioreth of the Healing House 38%
- Kelpie Guide 35%
- Forensic Researcher 5%
- North Pole Patrol 4%
Other options: Niblis of the Breath, Fatestitcher, Captain of the Mists, Puppeteer, Stonybrook Angler
Cards like Shore Up
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 49%
- Magic Damper 31%
- Octopus Form 16%
- Dive Down 12%
Other options: Glint, Mizzium Skin, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration
Cards like Future Sight
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Future Sight 37%
- Magus of the Future 34%
Cards like Crab Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ringing Strike Mastery
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Stay Hidden, Stay Silent, Waterknot, Locked in the Cemetery, Tangle Kelp, Blossombind, Stunning Strike, Mesmerizing Dose, Capture Sphere, Runner's Bane, Sleep Magic, So Shiny, Sleep Paralysis, Unquenchable Thirst, Thirst, Claustrophobia, Infinite Coursework, Dramatic Accusation, Frozen in Ice, Bind the Monster, Castaway's Despair, Winter's Rest, Bewitching Leechcraft, Spectral Prison, Bitter Chill, Bubble Snare, Sleeping Potion, Charmed Sleep, Motion Sickness, Containment Protocol, Mystic Restraints, Starlight Snare, Enchanted River's Grasp
Cards like Trophy Mage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Sol Ring
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 69%
- Basalt Monolith 19%
- Mana Vault 5%
- Grim Monolith 4%
Cards like Vizier of the Menagerie
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Realmwalker, Eladamri, Korvecdal
Cards like Counterspell
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 46%
- Negate 30%
Other options: Intervene, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Gretchen Titchwillow
4.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Sakura-Tribe Scout, Walking Atlas, Llanowar Scout, Skyshroud Ranger, Scaled Herbalist
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Jandor's Saddlebags, Puppet Strings
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 45%
- Lightning Greaves 19%
Cards like Urn of Godfire
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Goblin Firebomb
Cards like Fortune Teller's Talent
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Fabricate
5.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fabricate 22%
- Scour for Scrap 10%
Cards like Energy Refractor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Spare Supplies, Futurist Forge
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Snakeskin Veil 20%
- Tyvar's Stand 10%
- Overprotect 2%
Other options: Blossoming Defense, Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Slagwurm Armor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Slagwurm Armor 36%
- Kite Shield 4%
Other options: Greatsword, Vulshok Battlegear, Barbed Battlegear, Pennon Blade, Warlord's Axe
Cards like Planar Bridge
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Planar Bridge 23%
- Planar Portal 2%
Cards like Patriar's Seal
6.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Relic of Legends, Spectral Searchlight, Honor-Worn Shaku, Victory Chimes
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 30%
- Elvish Mystic 25%
- Fyndhorn Elves 14%
- Boreal Druid 2%
- Rootrider Faun 1%
Other options: Golden Hind, Llanowar Tribe, Sea Scryer, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer
All top picks (50)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.82 · 56.2% (127 of 226 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.86 · 44.7% (101 of 226 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.68 · 61.1% (138 of 226 decks)
- Prismite relevance 0.69 · 58.0% (131 of 226 decks)
- Stonework Packbeast relevance 0.71 · 54.9% (124 of 226 decks)
- Prophet of Distortion relevance 0.63 · 60.2% (136 of 226 decks)
- Tymora's Invoker relevance 0.83 · 31.9% (72 of 226 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.71 · 46.9% (106 of 226 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.77 · 36.3% (82 of 226 decks)
- Thassa's Ire relevance 0.78 · 33.2% (75 of 226 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.76 · 34.1% (77 of 226 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.74 · 35.0% (79 of 226 decks)
- Gemstone Array relevance 0.74 · 33.2% (75 of 226 decks)
- Crossroads Candleguide relevance 0.78 · 27.0% (61 of 226 decks)
- Singing Bell Strike relevance 0.78 · 27.0% (61 of 226 decks)
- Signpost Scarecrow relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (55 of 226 decks)
- Third Path Savant relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (50 of 226 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.68 · 37.2% (84 of 226 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.61 · 46.0% (104 of 226 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.73 · 23.9% (54 of 226 decks)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.68 · 27.4% (62 of 226 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.54 · 43.8% (99 of 226 decks)
- Dimensional Infiltrator relevance 0.66 · 25.2% (57 of 226 decks)
- Biomechan Engineer relevance 0.60 · 32.7% (74 of 226 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.50 · 48.2% (109 of 226 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.49 · 48.7% (110 of 226 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.53 · 40.7% (92 of 226 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.55 · 35.0% (79 of 226 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.50 · 43.8% (99 of 226 decks)
- Galvanic Alchemist relevance 0.63 · 21.2% (48 of 226 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.61 · 22.6% (51 of 226 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (29 of 226 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.63 · 17.7% (40 of 226 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (58 of 226 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.53 · 32.7% (74 of 226 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.45 · 48.2% (109 of 226 decks)
- Tower of Fortunes relevance 0.71 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.57 · 23.9% (54 of 226 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.49 · 37.6% (85 of 226 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.52 · 31.4% (71 of 226 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (30 of 226 decks)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.65 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.64 · 11.5% (26 of 226 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.50 · 31.4% (71 of 226 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.57 · 18.6% (42 of 226 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.48 · 31.0% (70 of 226 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 0.61 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (39 of 226 decks)
- Azure Mage relevance 0.60 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.44 · 34.5% (78 of 226 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Prismite relevance 0.69 · 58.0% (131 of 226 decks)
- Stonework Packbeast relevance 0.71 · 54.9% (124 of 226 decks)
- Prophet of Distortion relevance 0.63 · 60.2% (136 of 226 decks)
- Tymora's Invoker relevance 0.83 · 31.9% (72 of 226 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.76 · 34.1% (77 of 226 decks)
- Crossroads Candleguide relevance 0.78 · 27.0% (61 of 226 decks)
- Signpost Scarecrow relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (55 of 226 decks)
- Third Path Savant relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (50 of 226 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.54 · 43.8% (99 of 226 decks)
- Dimensional Infiltrator relevance 0.66 · 25.2% (57 of 226 decks)
- Biomechan Engineer relevance 0.60 · 32.7% (74 of 226 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.53 · 40.7% (92 of 226 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.55 · 35.0% (79 of 226 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.50 · 43.8% (99 of 226 decks)
- Galvanic Alchemist relevance 0.63 · 21.2% (48 of 226 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.45 · 48.2% (109 of 226 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.57 · 23.9% (54 of 226 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.49 · 37.6% (85 of 226 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (30 of 226 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.50 · 31.4% (71 of 226 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.48 · 31.0% (70 of 226 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (39 of 226 decks)
- Azure Mage relevance 0.60 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.44 · 34.5% (78 of 226 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Colossus of Akros relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (31 of 226 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.50 · 21.2% (48 of 226 decks)
- Wren's Run Hydra relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (31 of 226 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.44 · 19.0% (43 of 226 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Mystic Archaeologist relevance 0.55 · 6.2% (14 of 226 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (30 of 226 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.27 · 55.3% (125 of 226 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Hypnotic Grifter relevance 0.52 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (17 of 226 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.32 · 35.0% (79 of 226 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.34 · 28.3% (64 of 226 decks)
- Silvanus's Invoker relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 0.48 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.46 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Illithid Harvester // Plant Tadpoles relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.29 · 31.9% (72 of 226 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.38 · 10.6% (24 of 226 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.39 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.37 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.37 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (33 of 226 decks)
- Mindshrieker relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.82 · 56.2% (127 of 226 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.86 · 44.7% (101 of 226 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.68 · 61.1% (138 of 226 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.77 · 36.3% (82 of 226 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.74 · 35.0% (79 of 226 decks)
- Gemstone Array relevance 0.74 · 33.2% (75 of 226 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.61 · 46.0% (104 of 226 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.73 · 23.9% (54 of 226 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.50 · 48.2% (109 of 226 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.61 · 22.6% (51 of 226 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (29 of 226 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.63 · 17.7% (40 of 226 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (58 of 226 decks)
- Tower of Fortunes relevance 0.71 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.65 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.64 · 11.5% (26 of 226 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 0.61 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.44 · 25.7% (58 of 226 decks)
- Vivien's Arkbow relevance 0.57 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Goblin Cannon relevance 0.58 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.50 · 12.4% (28 of 226 decks)
- Swashbuckler's Whip relevance 0.55 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Rod of Absorption relevance 0.54 · 6.2% (14 of 226 decks)
- Kite Shield relevance 0.57 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Vanguard's Shield relevance 0.55 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (30 of 226 decks)
- Mask of Avacyn relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.39 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Tower of Calamities relevance 0.51 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.40 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Bronze Cudgels relevance 0.49 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Captain America's Shield relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.33 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.26 · 19.5% (44 of 226 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (13 of 226 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.30 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.35 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 45.1% (102 of 226 decks)
- Oracle's Vault relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.71 · 46.9% (106 of 226 decks)
- Thassa's Ire relevance 0.78 · 33.2% (75 of 226 decks)
- Singing Bell Strike relevance 0.78 · 27.0% (61 of 226 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.68 · 37.2% (84 of 226 decks)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.68 · 27.4% (62 of 226 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.53 · 32.7% (74 of 226 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.52 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.46 · 17.3% (39 of 226 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.37 · 25.7% (58 of 226 decks)
- Precognition Field relevance 0.50 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.43 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.34 · 29.2% (66 of 226 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (20 of 226 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (29 of 226 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (41 of 226 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Central Elevator // Promising Stairs relevance 0.39 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 0.33 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.32 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.18 · 12.8% (29 of 226 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.30 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.30 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (29 of 226 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shore Up relevance 0.49 · 48.7% (110 of 226 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.52 · 31.4% (71 of 226 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.56 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.45 · 16.4% (37 of 226 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.44 · 19.0% (43 of 226 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.47 · 12.4% (28 of 226 decks)
- Ornamental Courage relevance 0.53 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (32 of 226 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.37 · 14.2% (32 of 226 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.31 · 12.8% (29 of 226 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.28 · 20.4% (46 of 226 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.33 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (34 of 226 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.28 · 14.6% (33 of 226 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.28 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Ride the Avalanche relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Steady Aim relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 13.7% (31 of 226 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (17 of 226 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.22 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.20 · 15.5% (35 of 226 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 30.1% (68 of 226 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Decree of Savagery relevance 0.35 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.16 · 28.8% (65 of 226 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.17 · 22.6% (51 of 226 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Triton Tactics relevance 0.32 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (14 of 226 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.30 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
All sorceries (42)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.57 · 18.6% (42 of 226 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.49 · 13.7% (31 of 226 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.44 · 10.6% (24 of 226 decks)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 0.45 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.31 · 21.7% (49 of 226 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (17 of 226 decks)
- Threats Undetected relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Path to the Festival relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.23 · 16.4% (37 of 226 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Deep Reconnaissance relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Visions of Duplicity relevance 0.34 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 26.1% (59 of 226 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 36.3% (82 of 226 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 33.6% (76 of 226 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.18 · 5.8% (13 of 226 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 23.0% (52 of 226 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 19.9% (45 of 226 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.15 · 6.2% (14 of 226 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 27.9% (63 of 226 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (33 of 226 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.49 · 7.5% (17 of 226 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.35 · 30.1% (68 of 226 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.39 · 14.6% (33 of 226 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Underdark Rift relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.30 · 19.0% (43 of 226 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (20 of 226 decks)
- Hall of Tagsin relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (13 of 226 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.27 · 12.8% (29 of 226 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (17 of 226 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.29 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 11.1% (25 of 226 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.29 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (13 of 226 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (19 of 226 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.30 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 42.5% (96 of 226 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.26 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 21.2% (48 of 226 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 15.9% (36 of 226 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.17 · 19.9% (45 of 226 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (19 of 226 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.16 · 13.7% (31 of 226 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (11 of 226 decks)
- Skycoach Waypoint relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.16 · 8.4% (19 of 226 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (14 of 226 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 11.5% (26 of 226 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.12 · 25.7% (58 of 226 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
All lands (45)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.64 · 42.0% (95 of 226 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.27 · 13.3% (30 of 226 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.17 · 35.0% (79 of 226 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.23 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.18 · 13.7% (31 of 226 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 28.8% (65 of 226 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (14 of 226 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 9.7% (22 of 226 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 15.5% (35 of 226 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (14 of 226 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (21 of 226 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.11 · 36.3% (82 of 226 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.11 · 35.4% (80 of 226 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.10 · 42.0% (95 of 226 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (27 of 226 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (12 of 226 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.14 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (13 of 226 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 54.4% (123 of 226 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 18.6% (42 of 226 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.14 · 10.2% (23 of 226 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 39.4% (89 of 226 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.11 · 28.3% (64 of 226 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (8 of 226 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 41.6% (94 of 226 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (10 of 226 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (18 of 226 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 6.6% (15 of 226 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (6 of 226 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 52.2% (118 of 226 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (9 of 226 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 77.9% (176 of 226 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 89.8% (203 of 226 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 90.7% (205 of 226 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher, from 226 real Commander partner decks.