Bioengineered Future
Played in 400 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.95 · 20.8% (83 of 400 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.81 · 15.3% (61 of 400 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (48 of 400 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.70 · 15.3% (61 of 400 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.65 · 13.0% (52 of 400 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.64 · 32.5% (130 of 400 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.63 · 12.8% (51 of 400 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.60 · 27.5% (110 of 400 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (39 of 400 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 24.3% (97 of 400 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.57 · 32.8% (131 of 400 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.56 · 18.5% (74 of 400 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 0.54 · 8.0% (32 of 400 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (38 of 400 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.52 · 16.5% (66 of 400 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.51 · 14.2% (57 of 400 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.51 · 21.0% (84 of 400 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.47 · 21.8% (87 of 400 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (40 of 400 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (73 of 400 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.45 · 18.5% (74 of 400 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (48 of 400 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (33 of 400 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (87 of 400 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.42 · 22.0% (88 of 400 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (50 of 400 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (52 of 400 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.41 · 16.5% (66 of 400 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.41 · 8.3% (33 of 400 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.40 · 7.5% (30 of 400 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.95 · 20.8% (83 of 400 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (48 of 400 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.70 · 15.3% (61 of 400 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.64 · 32.5% (130 of 400 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.63 · 12.8% (51 of 400 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.60 · 27.5% (110 of 400 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 24.3% (97 of 400 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.57 · 32.8% (131 of 400 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.56 · 18.5% (74 of 400 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 0.54 · 8.0% (32 of 400 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (38 of 400 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.52 · 16.5% (66 of 400 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.51 · 14.2% (57 of 400 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.51 · 21.0% (84 of 400 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (73 of 400 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.45 · 18.5% (74 of 400 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.42 · 22.0% (88 of 400 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (50 of 400 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.41 · 16.5% (66 of 400 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.40 · 16.0% (64 of 400 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (32 of 400 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.40 · 25.5% (102 of 400 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.39 · 15.8% (63 of 400 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (41 of 400 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.38 · 9.3% (37 of 400 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (44 of 400 decks)
- Kheru Goldkeeper relevance 0.37 · 15.8% (63 of 400 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (39 of 400 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (48 of 400 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (33 of 400 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (87 of 400 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.81 · 15.3% (61 of 400 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.65 · 13.0% (52 of 400 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (40 of 400 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (52 of 400 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.41 · 8.3% (33 of 400 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (47 of 400 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 0.47 · 21.8% (87 of 400 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.40 · 7.5% (30 of 400 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.38 · 14.2% (57 of 400 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.52 · 32.0% (128 of 400 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.42 · 19.3% (77 of 400 decks)
All lands (8)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.56 · 38.8% (155 of 400 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.52 · 34.5% (138 of 400 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (63 of 400 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.47 · 16.5% (66 of 400 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.46 · 27.0% (108 of 400 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.44 · 25.3% (101 of 400 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.40 · 14.0% (56 of 400 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.36 · 17.3% (69 of 400 decks)
EDH data for Bioengineered Future: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 400 real decks.