Change per day
Archetypes
94% of decks lean toward it
77% of decks lean toward it
25% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Dictate of Kruphix
94% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Kwain, Itinerant Meddler
77% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Nils, Discipline Enforcer
25% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Teferi's Ageless Insight
15% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 203 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Rites of Flourishing
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Scrawling Crawler
14× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Bant decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Propaganda
5.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Bant decks
Cards like Howling Mine
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Howling Mine 56%
- Font of Mythos 28%
- Anvil of Bogardan 4%
Cards like Cut a Deal
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cut a Deal 32%
- Secret Rendezvous 28%
Cards like Talisman of Progress
2.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Bant decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
5.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Bant decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Bant decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
4.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Bant decks
Cards like Vision Skeins
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Vision Skeins 22%
- Words of Wisdom 10%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 27%
- Lightning Greaves 25%
Cards like Beast Within
1.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Beast Within 26%
- Generous Gift 24%
Cards like Sergeant John Benton
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
5.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Fog 24%
- Holy Day 4%
- Ethereal Haze 3%
- Moment's Peace 2%
- Lull 2%
- Angelsong 2%
- Winds of Qal Sisma 1%
Other options: Hindervines, Terrifying Presence, Haze of Pollen, Thwart the Enemy, Root Snare, Hunter's Ambush, Tanglesap, Harmless Assault, Vine Snare, Pause for Reflection, Serene Sunset
Cards like Wizard Class
3.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Smothering Tithe
3.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like On the Trail
7.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
- On the Trail 23%
- Burgeoning 8%
Cards like Forced Fruition
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Forced Fruition 43%
- Standstill 6%
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other Bant decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.72 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.78 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cultivate 37%
- Rampant Growth 21%
- Kodama's Reach 15%
- Shared Roots 2%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
Other options: Traverse the Outlands, Explosive Vegetation, Migration Path, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Boundless Realms, Reshape the Earth, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Bant decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.65 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Counterspell 38%
- Dovin's Veto 17%
- Negate 14%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Body of Knowledge
10× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Tishana, Voice of Thunder
All top picks (50)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.56 · 55.0% (210 of 382 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 55.0% (210 of 382 decks)
- Sergeant John Benton relevance 0.63 · 41.4% (158 of 382 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.59 · 42.7% (163 of 382 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.51 · 56.0% (214 of 382 decks)
- Vision Skeins relevance 0.67 · 21.7% (83 of 382 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.61 · 29.8% (114 of 382 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.58 · 28.3% (108 of 382 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.55 · 33.2% (127 of 382 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.57 · 26.7% (102 of 382 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.57 · 27.7% (106 of 382 decks)
- Champions of Minas Tirith relevance 0.67 · 13.4% (51 of 382 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.60 · 20.9% (80 of 382 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.46 · 47.9% (183 of 382 decks)
- Ms. Bumbleflower relevance 0.51 · 34.8% (133 of 382 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.53 · 32.2% (123 of 382 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.54 · 29.6% (113 of 382 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.45 · 46.3% (177 of 382 decks)
- Sokrates, Athenian Teacher relevance 0.50 · 35.9% (137 of 382 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.56 · 22.3% (85 of 382 decks)
- The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.56 · 23.3% (89 of 382 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (85 of 382 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.38 · 56.8% (217 of 382 decks)
- Duggan, Private Detective relevance 0.55 · 19.9% (76 of 382 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.45 · 40.8% (156 of 382 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.60 · 13.6% (52 of 382 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.62 · 12.3% (47 of 382 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.47 · 34.6% (132 of 382 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (55 of 382 decks)
- Kwain, Itinerant Meddler relevance 0.36 · 57.9% (221 of 382 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.49 · 28.5% (109 of 382 decks)
- Walking Archive relevance 0.58 · 13.4% (51 of 382 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.34 · 61.8% (236 of 382 decks)
- Shabraz, the Skyshark relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (56 of 382 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (72 of 382 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.59 · 11.3% (43 of 382 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 0.40 · 43.7% (167 of 382 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.45 · 31.9% (122 of 382 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.47 · 27.0% (103 of 382 decks)
- Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (42 of 382 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.46 · 26.7% (102 of 382 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.48 · 21.2% (81 of 382 decks)
- Bessie, the Doctor's Roadster relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (44 of 382 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (52 of 382 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (52 of 382 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (70 of 382 decks)
- Viseling relevance 0.56 · 9.7% (37 of 382 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.51 · 13.9% (53 of 382 decks)
- Master of Ceremonies relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (63 of 382 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.41 · 30.6% (117 of 382 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.56 · 55.0% (210 of 382 decks)
- Sergeant John Benton relevance 0.63 · 41.4% (158 of 382 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.61 · 29.8% (114 of 382 decks)
- Champions of Minas Tirith relevance 0.67 · 13.4% (51 of 382 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.46 · 47.9% (183 of 382 decks)
- Ms. Bumbleflower relevance 0.51 · 34.8% (133 of 382 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.45 · 46.3% (177 of 382 decks)
- Sokrates, Athenian Teacher relevance 0.50 · 35.9% (137 of 382 decks)
- The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.56 · 23.3% (89 of 382 decks)
- Duggan, Private Detective relevance 0.55 · 19.9% (76 of 382 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.62 · 12.3% (47 of 382 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (55 of 382 decks)
- Kwain, Itinerant Meddler relevance 0.36 · 57.9% (221 of 382 decks)
- Walking Archive relevance 0.58 · 13.4% (51 of 382 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.34 · 61.8% (236 of 382 decks)
- Shabraz, the Skyshark relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (56 of 382 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (72 of 382 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.59 · 11.3% (43 of 382 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 0.40 · 43.7% (167 of 382 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.45 · 31.9% (122 of 382 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.47 · 27.0% (103 of 382 decks)
- Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (42 of 382 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.46 · 26.7% (102 of 382 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.48 · 21.2% (81 of 382 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (52 of 382 decks)
- Viseling relevance 0.56 · 9.7% (37 of 382 decks)
- Master of Ceremonies relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (63 of 382 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 0.45 · 22.5% (86 of 382 decks)
- Dakra Mystic relevance 0.57 · 6.5% (25 of 382 decks)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 0.44 · 16.0% (61 of 382 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (43 of 382 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (34 of 382 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.33 · 39.8% (152 of 382 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 0.36 · 28.5% (109 of 382 decks)
- Heliod, the Radiant Dawn // Heliod, the Warped Eclipse relevance 0.41 · 14.9% (57 of 382 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (31 of 382 decks)
- Braids, Conjurer Adept relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.35 · 29.6% (113 of 382 decks)
- Erestor of the Council relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.30 · 39.3% (150 of 382 decks)
- Tegan Jovanka relevance 0.46 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (28 of 382 decks)
- Willie Lumpkin, Postman relevance 0.47 · 5.2% (20 of 382 decks)
- Prince Imrahil the Fair relevance 0.43 · 8.1% (31 of 382 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.42 · 8.6% (33 of 382 decks)
- Brago's Representative relevance 0.53 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Loran of the Third Path relevance 0.28 · 41.4% (158 of 382 decks)
- Howling Golem relevance 0.49 · 4.5% (17 of 382 decks)
- Yes Man, Personal Securitron relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.51 · 56.0% (214 of 382 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.58 · 28.3% (108 of 382 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.55 · 33.2% (127 of 382 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.57 · 27.7% (106 of 382 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.54 · 29.6% (113 of 382 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.45 · 40.8% (156 of 382 decks)
- Bessie, the Doctor's Roadster relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (44 of 382 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (52 of 382 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.45 · 16.8% (64 of 382 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.55 · 5.8% (22 of 382 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.52 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.52 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (36 of 382 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (41 of 382 decks)
- Iron Maiden relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (26 of 382 decks)
- TARDIS relevance 0.44 · 7.9% (30 of 382 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (26 of 382 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.47 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (20 of 382 decks)
- Ebony Owl Netsuke relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (52 of 382 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.35 · 12.0% (46 of 382 decks)
- Black Vise relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (16 of 382 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.30 · 22.0% (84 of 382 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.28 · 24.1% (92 of 382 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Heroes' Podium relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (20 of 382 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (14 of 382 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 37.4% (143 of 382 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Norn's Annex relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (34 of 382 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (42 of 382 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.22 · 25.4% (97 of 382 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.27 · 10.5% (40 of 382 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 12.6% (48 of 382 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (13 of 382 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Ace's Baseball Bat relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (17 of 382 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (13 of 382 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.17 · 26.7% (102 of 382 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 55.0% (210 of 382 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.59 · 42.7% (163 of 382 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.56 · 22.3% (85 of 382 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.38 · 56.8% (217 of 382 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.60 · 13.6% (52 of 382 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (70 of 382 decks)
- Noble Heritage relevance 0.49 · 12.0% (46 of 382 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (58 of 382 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.30 · 47.6% (182 of 382 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.40 · 15.4% (59 of 382 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.36 · 23.0% (88 of 382 decks)
- The Night of the Doctor relevance 0.46 · 8.4% (32 of 382 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.48 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.31 · 36.1% (138 of 382 decks)
- Trial of a Time Lord relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (26 of 382 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.46 · 5.8% (22 of 382 decks)
- Monologue Tax relevance 0.43 · 8.1% (31 of 382 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (72 of 382 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Day of Destiny relevance 0.42 · 5.2% (20 of 382 decks)
- Solitary Confinement relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- An Unearthly Child relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Banish to Another Universe relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (17 of 382 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.35 · 8.6% (33 of 382 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.27 · 24.1% (92 of 382 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.25 · 31.2% (119 of 382 decks)
- The Caves of Androzani relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (41 of 382 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.35 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- City of Death relevance 0.35 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (31 of 382 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.25 · 22.0% (84 of 382 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (31 of 382 decks)
- Gallifrey Stands relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (14 of 382 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.31 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.31 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Regenerations Restored relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- The Sea Devils relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- The Curse of Fenric relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- Oath of Lieges relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- The War Games relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Upwelling relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (20 of 382 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (16 of 382 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.17 · 24.3% (93 of 382 decks)
All instants (50)
- Vision Skeins relevance 0.67 · 21.7% (83 of 382 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (85 of 382 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.49 · 28.5% (109 of 382 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.54 · 9.9% (38 of 382 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.53 · 8.6% (33 of 382 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.57 · 5.8% (22 of 382 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.41 · 24.3% (93 of 382 decks)
- Your Temple Is Under Attack relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (33 of 382 decks)
- Oblation relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (32 of 382 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.50 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Time Lord Regeneration relevance 0.44 · 5.2% (20 of 382 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.25 · 47.6% (182 of 382 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.35 · 13.1% (50 of 382 decks)
- Render Silent relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (26 of 382 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (42 of 382 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.29 · 27.2% (104 of 382 decks)
- Return to Dust relevance 0.39 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.27 · 19.9% (76 of 382 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.28 · 16.8% (64 of 382 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- Dawn Charm relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Riot Control relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (49 of 382 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Out of Bounds relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Emergency Powers relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.24 · 17.8% (68 of 382 decks)
- Flatline relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Holy Day relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (14 of 382 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (13 of 382 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.22 · 14.4% (55 of 382 decks)
- Perch Protection relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (38 of 382 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.19 · 26.2% (100 of 382 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.19 · 24.1% (92 of 382 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.20 · 16.8% (64 of 382 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- Ethereal Haze relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.22 · 8.4% (32 of 382 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 33.8% (129 of 382 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (41 of 382 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Crumb and Get It relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.13 · 38.0% (145 of 382 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
All sorceries (47)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.57 · 26.7% (102 of 382 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.53 · 32.2% (123 of 382 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.47 · 34.6% (132 of 382 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.51 · 13.9% (53 of 382 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.41 · 30.6% (117 of 382 decks)
- Prosperity relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (44 of 382 decks)
- Fractured Identity relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (48 of 382 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.51 · 6.5% (25 of 382 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.37 · 28.3% (108 of 382 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.47 · 9.9% (38 of 382 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.49 · 6.8% (26 of 382 decks)
- Skyscribing relevance 0.51 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- The Wedding of River Song relevance 0.54 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- Crisis of Conscience relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Twice Upon a Time // Unlikely Meeting relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (22 of 382 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.31 · 28.5% (109 of 382 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.34 · 17.5% (67 of 382 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (42 of 382 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.29 · 21.5% (82 of 382 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- Tempt with Bunnies relevance 0.29 · 14.7% (56 of 382 decks)
- The Five Doctors relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Starfall Invocation relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (26 of 382 decks)
- Zndrsplt's Judgment relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Fascination relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.24 · 17.8% (68 of 382 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (39 of 382 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.21 · 14.7% (56 of 382 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.17 · 34.8% (133 of 382 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 20.7% (79 of 382 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 37.2% (142 of 382 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.19 · 12.3% (47 of 382 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 16.8% (64 of 382 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (13 of 382 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.11 · 36.6% (140 of 382 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.60 · 20.9% (80 of 382 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (48 of 382 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- Basri Ket relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (14 of 382 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.55 · 30.9% (118 of 382 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.53 · 28.0% (107 of 382 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.56 · 22.5% (86 of 382 decks)
- Gallifrey Council Chamber relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (44 of 382 decks)
- Celestial Colonnade relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (49 of 382 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.28 · 36.4% (139 of 382 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.33 · 17.0% (65 of 382 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.34 · 13.4% (51 of 382 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.33 · 14.4% (55 of 382 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (34 of 382 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.31 · 13.1% (50 of 382 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.37 · 3.7% (14 of 382 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.20 · 30.9% (118 of 382 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.27 · 8.1% (31 of 382 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.19 · 27.2% (104 of 382 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (13 of 382 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.19 · 24.3% (93 of 382 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 53.9% (206 of 382 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.15 · 42.7% (163 of 382 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (14 of 382 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.17 · 30.1% (115 of 382 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.23 · 6.5% (25 of 382 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (27 of 382 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (28 of 382 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (41 of 382 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (15 of 382 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (14 of 382 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (13 of 382 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (11 of 382 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (13 of 382 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (10 of 382 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (9 of 382 decks)
All lands (50)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.23 · 38.7% (148 of 382 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.30 · 12.3% (47 of 382 decks)
- Port Town relevance 0.24 · 27.0% (103 of 382 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (147 of 382 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.24 · 24.1% (92 of 382 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (21 of 382 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.18 · 48.4% (185 of 382 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.22 · 24.1% (92 of 382 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (39 of 382 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (38 of 382 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.26 · 9.7% (37 of 382 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.19 · 27.7% (106 of 382 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (29 of 382 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.23 · 11.5% (44 of 382 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (30 of 382 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.18 · 24.9% (95 of 382 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (20 of 382 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (41 of 382 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (46 of 382 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.17 · 27.5% (105 of 382 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.22 · 9.7% (37 of 382 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 8.6% (33 of 382 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (39 of 382 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (19 of 382 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (39 of 382 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.16 · 25.9% (99 of 382 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.20 · 9.7% (37 of 382 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.12 · 53.9% (206 of 382 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.16 · 24.3% (93 of 382 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (23 of 382 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (22 of 382 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (39 of 382 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.10 · 60.7% (232 of 382 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.11 · 53.1% (203 of 382 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (102 of 382 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 17.5% (67 of 382 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.11 · 55.2% (211 of 382 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.15 · 19.4% (74 of 382 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.14 · 21.2% (81 of 382 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (24 of 382 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.17 · 8.6% (33 of 382 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (12 of 382 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 19.9% (76 of 382 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 19.9% (76 of 382 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (18 of 382 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.11 · 36.6% (140 of 382 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Leela, Sevateem Warrior // The Second Doctor, from 382 real Commander partner decks.