Devastating Summons
Played in 105 Gruul decks
230+20+3+6+5+10+3+3+
Color Identity Spread
10.3% Gruul
Commanders
Most Relevant
Titania, Protector of Argoth 48.6% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 48.6% of decks
Nahiri's Lithoforming 39.0% of decks
Nahiri's Lithoforming 39.0% of decks
Roiling Regrowth 43.8% of decks
Roiling Regrowth 43.8% of decks
Harrow 57.1% of decks
Harrow 57.1% of decks
Splendid Reclamation 37.1% of decks
Splendid Reclamation 37.1% of decks
Zendikar's Roil 28.6% of decks
Zendikar's Roil 28.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- The Lady of Otaria relevance 0.94 · 1.1% (4 of 371 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Guild Artisan relevance 0.43 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.64 · 48.6% (51 of 105 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.54 · 39.0% (41 of 105 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.35 · 43.8% (46 of 105 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.29 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.22 · 37.1% (39 of 105 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.12 · 28.6% (30 of 105 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.10 · 37.1% (39 of 105 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 1.08 · 35.2% (37 of 105 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.04 · 35.2% (37 of 105 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.98 · 34.3% (36 of 105 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Hew the Entwood relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.95 · 39.0% (41 of 105 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 29.5% (31 of 105 decks)
- Tempt with Vengeance relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.94 · 30.5% (32 of 105 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.87 · 25.7% (27 of 105 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.87 · 18.1% (19 of 105 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.86 · 21.0% (22 of 105 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.84 · 31.4% (33 of 105 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.84 · 27.6% (29 of 105 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.84 · 26.7% (28 of 105 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 23.8% (25 of 105 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.82 · 26.7% (28 of 105 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.81 · 35.2% (37 of 105 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.81 · 22.9% (24 of 105 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.80 · 22.9% (24 of 105 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.64 · 48.6% (51 of 105 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.10 · 37.1% (39 of 105 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.04 · 35.2% (37 of 105 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.98 · 34.3% (36 of 105 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.94 · 30.5% (32 of 105 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.86 · 21.0% (22 of 105 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.84 · 31.4% (33 of 105 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.84 · 27.6% (29 of 105 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.84 · 26.7% (28 of 105 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.82 · 26.7% (28 of 105 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.79 · 19.0% (20 of 105 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.77 · 23.8% (25 of 105 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.73 · 24.8% (26 of 105 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.71 · 27.6% (29 of 105 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.70 · 12.4% (13 of 105 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.68 · 22.9% (24 of 105 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.66 · 23.8% (25 of 105 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.65 · 28.6% (30 of 105 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 29.5% (31 of 105 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 23.8% (25 of 105 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.80 · 22.9% (24 of 105 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.12 · 28.6% (30 of 105 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.69 · 26.7% (28 of 105 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (23 of 105 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.66 · 16.2% (17 of 105 decks)
All instants (5)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.35 · 43.8% (46 of 105 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.29 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 1.08 · 35.2% (37 of 105 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.95 · 39.0% (41 of 105 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.81 · 35.2% (37 of 105 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.54 · 39.0% (41 of 105 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.22 · 37.1% (39 of 105 decks)
- Hew the Entwood relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Tempt with Vengeance relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.87 · 25.7% (27 of 105 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.87 · 18.1% (19 of 105 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.81 · 22.9% (24 of 105 decks)
- Highway Robbery relevance 0.75 · 16.2% (17 of 105 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (15 of 105 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.79 · 37.1% (39 of 105 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.79 · 25.7% (27 of 105 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.67 · 19.0% (20 of 105 decks)
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.99 · 64.8% (68 of 105 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.98 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.67 · 35.2% (37 of 105 decks)
EDH data for Devastating Summons: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 105 real decks.

















































