Redrock Sentinel
Played in 160 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (10)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.72 · 3.4% (45 of 1,316 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.58 · 1.5% (16 of 1,095 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.36 · 1.4% (11 of 797 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.75 · 2.9% (2 of 69 decks)
- Haru, Hidden Talent relevance 0.68 · 2.1% (2 of 96 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.58 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.54 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.41 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Master Chef // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.36 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.78 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.50 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.31 · 49.4% (79 of 160 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.29 · 48.8% (78 of 160 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 1.12 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.08 · 47.5% (76 of 160 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.07 · 59.4% (95 of 160 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.04 · 33.8% (54 of 160 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.04 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.04 · 39.4% (63 of 160 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 1.03 · 35.0% (56 of 160 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.94 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.94 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.92 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.91 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.91 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.91 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.91 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.89 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.81 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.79 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.77 · 37.5% (60 of 160 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.76 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.76 · 41.3% (66 of 160 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.71 · 36.9% (59 of 160 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.70 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.67 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 33.8% (54 of 160 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.78 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.31 · 49.4% (79 of 160 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.08 · 47.5% (76 of 160 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.04 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.94 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.92 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.91 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.91 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.91 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.89 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.79 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.77 · 37.5% (60 of 160 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.71 · 36.9% (59 of 160 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.67 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 33.8% (54 of 160 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.67 · 35.0% (56 of 160 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.50 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.04 · 39.4% (63 of 160 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.94 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.91 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.76 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.64 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Druid Class relevance 0.70 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.67 · 13.8% (22 of 160 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.65 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
All instants (5)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.29 · 48.8% (78 of 160 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.07 · 59.4% (95 of 160 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 1.03 · 35.0% (56 of 160 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.81 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.76 · 41.3% (66 of 160 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 1.12 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.04 · 33.8% (54 of 160 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.81 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.81 · 17.5% (28 of 160 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.72 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.69 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.69 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (26 of 160 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.63 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
All lands (7)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 1.07 · 56.9% (91 of 160 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 1.06 · 52.5% (84 of 160 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.90 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.86 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.86 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.80 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.69 · 35.6% (57 of 160 decks)
EDH data for Redrock Sentinel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 160 real decks.