Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Erestor of the Council relevance 0.56 · 67.3% (181 of 269 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.50 · 77.0% (207 of 269 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.61 · 57.2% (154 of 269 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.61 · 56.1% (151 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.51 · 70.6% (190 of 269 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.54 · 64.3% (173 of 269 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.58 · 57.6% (155 of 269 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.52 · 66.5% (179 of 269 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.53 · 59.9% (161 of 269 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.53 · 57.6% (155 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 77.0% (207 of 269 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.54 · 50.2% (135 of 269 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.51 · 55.0% (148 of 269 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.48 · 58.4% (157 of 269 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.54 · 45.4% (122 of 269 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.53 · 47.2% (127 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 52.8% (142 of 269 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.53 · 43.5% (117 of 269 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.45 · 58.7% (158 of 269 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.52 · 42.8% (115 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.50 · 46.1% (124 of 269 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.44 · 57.2% (154 of 269 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.46 · 53.2% (143 of 269 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.53 · 36.4% (98 of 269 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.39 · 66.5% (179 of 269 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.55 · 32.0% (86 of 269 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.56 · 26.8% (72 of 269 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.47 · 43.5% (117 of 269 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.48 · 38.3% (103 of 269 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.52 · 30.5% (82 of 269 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 76.2% (205 of 269 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.49 · 34.2% (92 of 269 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.46 · 40.1% (108 of 269 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.41 · 51.3% (138 of 269 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.42 · 48.3% (130 of 269 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.37 · 59.1% (159 of 269 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.50 · 27.9% (75 of 269 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.54 · 19.7% (53 of 269 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.38 · 54.6% (147 of 269 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.41 · 43.1% (116 of 269 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 22.3% (60 of 269 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.47 · 28.6% (77 of 269 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.30 · 72.1% (194 of 269 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.51 · 19.3% (52 of 269 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.45 · 30.5% (82 of 269 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.36 · 50.9% (137 of 269 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.45 · 27.5% (74 of 269 decks)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 0.49 · 18.6% (50 of 269 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.48 · 20.1% (54 of 269 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.41 · 33.8% (91 of 269 decks)
Card Stacks
14
Card Stacks
14Showing 1-2 of 14
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Archdruid 77%
- Imperious Perfect 22%
- Galadhrim Brigade 22%
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary 20%
- Canopy Tactician 5%
Other options: Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Essence Flux
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Elvish Mystic
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 81%
- Llanowar Elves 46%
- Fyndhorn Elves 19%
- Boreal Druid 4%
Other options: Lifespring Druid, Gyre Engineer, Fyndhorn Elder, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Arcane Signet
5.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 77%
- Commander's Sphere 26%
Cards like Gyre Sage
3.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Gyre Sage 20%
- Incubation Druid 18%
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 17%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
10.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
8.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Priest of Titania
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elvish Visionary
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards like Farhaven Elf
5.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Primeval Herald, Simulacrum Shaper, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger, Wild Wanderer
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
3.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Erestor of the Council relevance 0.56 · 67.3% (181 of 269 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.50 · 77.0% (207 of 269 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.61 · 56.1% (151 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.51 · 70.6% (190 of 269 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.58 · 57.6% (155 of 269 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.53 · 59.9% (161 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 77.0% (207 of 269 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.54 · 50.2% (135 of 269 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.51 · 55.0% (148 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 52.8% (142 of 269 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.45 · 58.7% (158 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.50 · 46.1% (124 of 269 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.44 · 57.2% (154 of 269 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.53 · 36.4% (98 of 269 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.39 · 66.5% (179 of 269 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.55 · 32.0% (86 of 269 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.56 · 26.8% (72 of 269 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.52 · 30.5% (82 of 269 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 76.2% (205 of 269 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.42 · 48.3% (130 of 269 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.54 · 19.7% (53 of 269 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.38 · 54.6% (147 of 269 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 22.3% (60 of 269 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.45 · 30.5% (82 of 269 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.36 · 50.9% (137 of 269 decks)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 0.49 · 18.6% (50 of 269 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.48 · 20.1% (54 of 269 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.46 · 22.3% (60 of 269 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.34 · 50.6% (136 of 269 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.49 · 14.9% (40 of 269 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.37 · 39.0% (105 of 269 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.43 · 25.7% (69 of 269 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (32 of 269 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (41 of 269 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (35 of 269 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.46 · 16.0% (43 of 269 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.42 · 17.1% (46 of 269 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.37 · 28.3% (76 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.21 · 80.7% (217 of 269 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.38 · 19.0% (51 of 269 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.37 · 21.2% (57 of 269 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (29 of 269 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.25 · 52.8% (142 of 269 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.44 · 7.4% (20 of 269 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 0.41 · 10.4% (28 of 269 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (17 of 269 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (23 of 269 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (26 of 269 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (29 of 269 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
Artifacts
35
Artifacts
35 Showing 1-10 of 35
Page size
All artifacts (35)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.53 · 43.5% (117 of 269 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.46 · 40.1% (108 of 269 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.50 · 27.9% (75 of 269 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (27 of 269 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.36 · 23.8% (64 of 269 decks)
- Golden Argosy relevance 0.46 · 8.6% (23 of 269 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.37 · 14.1% (38 of 269 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.32 · 25.7% (69 of 269 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (18 of 269 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (29 of 269 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (25 of 269 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 48.0% (129 of 269 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.26 · 21.6% (58 of 269 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (31 of 269 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.23 · 10.4% (28 of 269 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (23 of 269 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (10 of 269 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (10 of 269 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 77.0% (207 of 269 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.12 · 10.0% (27 of 269 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (19 of 269 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 88.5% (238 of 269 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
Enchantments
32
Enchantments
32 Showing 1-10 of 32
Page size
All enchantments (32)
- Asceticism relevance 0.46 · 53.2% (143 of 269 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.49 · 34.2% (92 of 269 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (43 of 269 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.37 · 16.0% (43 of 269 decks)
- Roll-Roll-Roll-Roll relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (15 of 269 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (28 of 269 decks)
- Mirror Mockery relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (25 of 269 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 25.3% (68 of 269 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (45 of 269 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.20 · 17.1% (46 of 269 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (20 of 269 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.18 · 27.9% (75 of 269 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (15 of 269 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (15 of 269 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (23 of 269 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (15 of 269 decks)
- Arboreal Alliance relevance 0.31 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (18 of 269 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.18 · 8.6% (23 of 269 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 9.7% (26 of 269 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (15 of 269 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.61 · 57.2% (154 of 269 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.52 · 66.5% (179 of 269 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.53 · 57.6% (155 of 269 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.48 · 58.4% (157 of 269 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.54 · 45.4% (122 of 269 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.53 · 47.2% (127 of 269 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.48 · 38.3% (103 of 269 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.41 · 43.1% (116 of 269 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.47 · 28.6% (77 of 269 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.51 · 19.3% (52 of 269 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.45 · 27.5% (74 of 269 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.45 · 18.6% (50 of 269 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.37 · 36.1% (97 of 269 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.42 · 19.3% (52 of 269 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (30 of 269 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.22 · 68.0% (183 of 269 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.43 · 6.7% (18 of 269 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (20 of 269 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.17 · 74.0% (199 of 269 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (19 of 269 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (39 of 269 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.22 · 28.3% (76 of 269 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (10 of 269 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 71.4% (192 of 269 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.12 · 59.1% (159 of 269 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (32 of 269 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (16 of 269 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.17 · 19.0% (51 of 269 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 10.4% (28 of 269 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (50 of 269 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 14.5% (39 of 269 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.15 · 14.5% (39 of 269 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (13 of 269 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.10 · 36.8% (99 of 269 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (16 of 269 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (12 of 269 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (27 of 269 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 11.9% (32 of 269 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (12 of 269 decks)
Sorceries
45
Sorceries
45 Showing 1-10 of 45
Page size
All sorceries (45)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.54 · 64.3% (173 of 269 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.52 · 42.8% (115 of 269 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.47 · 43.5% (117 of 269 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.41 · 51.3% (138 of 269 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.37 · 59.1% (159 of 269 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.30 · 72.1% (194 of 269 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.41 · 33.8% (91 of 269 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.47 · 21.2% (57 of 269 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.47 · 19.0% (51 of 269 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.41 · 30.5% (82 of 269 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.46 · 18.6% (50 of 269 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.32 · 40.5% (109 of 269 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (32 of 269 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.37 · 22.7% (61 of 269 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (19 of 269 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (37 of 269 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.39 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (16 of 269 decks)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 65.4% (176 of 269 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 69.1% (186 of 269 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.22 · 16.0% (43 of 269 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (16 of 269 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (16 of 269 decks)
- The Ring Goes South relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.17 · 8.6% (23 of 269 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (17 of 269 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.13 · 13.8% (37 of 269 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.11 · 9.7% (26 of 269 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 12.3% (33 of 269 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 9.3% (25 of 269 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
Planeswalkers
2
Planeswalkers
2 
All planeswalkers (2)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (12 of 269 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
Utility Lands
31
Utility Lands
31 Showing 1-10 of 31
Page size
All utility lands (31)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.48 · 43.9% (118 of 269 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.43 · 47.6% (128 of 269 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.42 · 42.4% (114 of 269 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.34 · 22.7% (61 of 269 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (27 of 269 decks)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (13 of 269 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (13 of 269 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (21 of 269 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 21.2% (57 of 269 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.17 · 6.7% (18 of 269 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.16 · 11.2% (30 of 269 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (15 of 269 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (17 of 269 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (27 of 269 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (10 of 269 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.15 · 8.9% (24 of 269 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (17 of 269 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.11 · 16.4% (44 of 269 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (13 of 269 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (19 of 269 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (11 of 269 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 18.2% (49 of 269 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
Lands
39
Lands
39 Showing 1-10 of 39
Page size
All lands (39)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.40 · 39.0% (105 of 269 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.40 · 37.9% (102 of 269 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.25 · 49.4% (133 of 269 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.18 · 69.9% (188 of 269 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.34 · 5.9% (16 of 269 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.13 · 81.4% (219 of 269 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 77.7% (209 of 269 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.12 · 81.0% (218 of 269 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (19 of 269 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.07 · 87.4% (235 of 269 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 8.6% (23 of 269 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.16 · 11.9% (32 of 269 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 15.6% (42 of 269 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.13 · 11.2% (30 of 269 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (24 of 269 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (16 of 269 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.13 · 8.2% (22 of 269 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 28.3% (76 of 269 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (12 of 269 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 28.6% (77 of 269 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 16.4% (44 of 269 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (14 of 269 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 27.5% (74 of 269 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (8 of 269 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 93.3% (251 of 269 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (7 of 269 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 97.0% (261 of 269 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 96.7% (260 of 269 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Elrond of the White Council, from 269 real Commander decks.