Manabond
Played in 232 Jund decks
530+14+3+4+4+4+1+14+6+
Color Identity Spread
4.4% Jund
Commanders
Soul of Windgrace 2.3% of decks
Soul of Windgrace 2.3% of decks
Vaevictis Asmadi 2.1% of decks
Vaevictis Asmadi 2.1% of decks
Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 3.8% of decks
Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 3.8% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Tana, the Bloodsower 2.9% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Tana, the Bloodsower 2.9% of decks
Tormod, the Desecrator // Tana, the Bloodsower 2.0% of decks
Tormod, the Desecrator // Tana, the Bloodsower 2.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Exploration 52.6% of decks
Exploration 52.6% of decks
Squandered Resources 37.9% of decks
Squandered Resources 37.9% of decks
Scapeshift 42.7% of decks
Scapeshift 42.7% of decks
Life from the Loam 47.0% of decks
Life from the Loam 47.0% of decks
Burgeoning 34.1% of decks
Burgeoning 34.1% of decks
Crop Rotation 54.7% of decks
Crop Rotation 54.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 1.83 · 2.3% (25 of 1,090 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi relevance 0.88 · 2.1% (4 of 188 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.45 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.38 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Exploration relevance 1.25 · 52.6% (122 of 232 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 1.16 · 37.9% (88 of 232 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.12 · 42.7% (99 of 232 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.11 · 47.0% (109 of 232 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 1.11 · 34.1% (79 of 232 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.06 · 54.7% (127 of 232 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.04 · 51.3% (119 of 232 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.98 · 44.4% (103 of 232 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 39.2% (91 of 232 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.98 · 47.8% (111 of 232 decks)
- Six relevance 0.95 · 42.2% (98 of 232 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.94 · 29.3% (68 of 232 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.94 · 35.8% (83 of 232 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.91 · 37.5% (87 of 232 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.91 · 55.2% (128 of 232 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.88 · 47.4% (110 of 232 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.88 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.86 · 50.0% (116 of 232 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.85 · 40.9% (95 of 232 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.85 · 26.3% (61 of 232 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.84 · 52.2% (121 of 232 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.84 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.83 · 31.0% (72 of 232 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.83 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (32 of 232 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.70 · 18.1% (42 of 232 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.70 · 37.5% (87 of 232 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.69 · 19.0% (44 of 232 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.66 · 31.9% (74 of 232 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.64 · 21.1% (49 of 232 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.98 · 44.4% (103 of 232 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 39.2% (91 of 232 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.98 · 47.8% (111 of 232 decks)
- Six relevance 0.95 · 42.2% (98 of 232 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.94 · 29.3% (68 of 232 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.94 · 35.8% (83 of 232 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.91 · 55.2% (128 of 232 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.88 · 47.4% (110 of 232 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.85 · 40.9% (95 of 232 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.84 · 52.2% (121 of 232 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.83 · 31.0% (72 of 232 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.70 · 18.1% (42 of 232 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.70 · 37.5% (87 of 232 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.66 · 31.9% (74 of 232 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.04 · 51.3% (119 of 232 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.91 · 37.5% (87 of 232 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.85 · 26.3% (61 of 232 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Exploration relevance 1.25 · 52.6% (122 of 232 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 1.16 · 37.9% (88 of 232 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 1.11 · 34.1% (79 of 232 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (32 of 232 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.06 · 54.7% (127 of 232 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.88 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.84 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.83 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.12 · 42.7% (99 of 232 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.11 · 47.0% (109 of 232 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.86 · 50.0% (116 of 232 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.64 · 21.1% (49 of 232 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.69 · 19.0% (44 of 232 decks)
All utility lands (14)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.17 · 32.3% (75 of 232 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 1.05 · 24.6% (57 of 232 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.91 · 39.7% (92 of 232 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.90 · 28.0% (65 of 232 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.89 · 33.6% (78 of 232 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.84 · 22.0% (51 of 232 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.83 · 31.9% (74 of 232 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.79 · 44.4% (103 of 232 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.76 · 42.2% (98 of 232 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.74 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.73 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.72 · 21.1% (49 of 232 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.68 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (41 of 232 decks)
All lands (6)
- Vesuva relevance 1.14 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.82 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.81 · 20.7% (48 of 232 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.77 · 29.7% (69 of 232 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.65 · 28.9% (67 of 232 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.64 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
EDH data for Manabond: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 232 real decks.














































