Cards like Apex Devastator
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 55% of other Simic decks
68% of decks run two or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 62%
- Kodama's Reach 52%
- Rampant Growth 35%
- Search for Tomorrow 26%
- Migration Path 19%
- Verdant Mastery 16%
- Explosive Vegetation 12%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Grow from the Ashes 4%
- Map the Frontier 4%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
- Terramorph 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- Primal Growth 1%
- They Went This Way 1%
Other options: Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Map the Wastes, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 25%
- Mana Reflection 20%
Cards like Sublime Epiphany
7.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Troyan, Gutsy Explorer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Entish Restoration
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Skyshroud Claim
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Skyshroud Claim 32%
- Nature's Lore 27%
- Three Visits 21%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 10%
- Ranger's Path 5%
- Hunting Wilds 2%
- Glimpse the Core 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Nulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nulldrifter 37%
- Wretched Gryff 11%
Cards like Kozilek's Unsealing
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Sceptre of Eternal Glory
Cards like Thunderous Snapper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 20%
- Swiftfoot Boots 16%
Cards like Wood Elves
6.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Dawnglade Regent
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Entourage of Trest, Keeper of Keys, Azure Fleet Admiral
Cards like Natural Reclamation
9.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Natural Reclamation 19%
- Krosan Grip 6%
- Naturalize 2%
Other options: Oxidize, Wilt, Stomp and Howl, Relic Crush, Wear Away, Break Asunder, Verdigris
Cards like Fierce Empath
7.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.27 · 63.6% (185 of 291 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.37 · 31.3% (91 of 291 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.35 · 37.8% (110 of 291 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.40 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.40 · 22.7% (66 of 291 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.38 · 27.5% (80 of 291 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (57 of 291 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.39 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.39 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.34 · 36.8% (107 of 291 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.32 · 43.0% (125 of 291 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.41 · 18.9% (55 of 291 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.36 · 29.6% (86 of 291 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.37 · 26.5% (77 of 291 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.40 · 20.6% (60 of 291 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.33 · 36.1% (105 of 291 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.40 · 18.6% (54 of 291 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.37 · 25.4% (74 of 291 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.35 · 30.2% (88 of 291 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.42 · 14.1% (41 of 291 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (42 of 291 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.40 · 16.2% (47 of 291 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.41 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (42 of 291 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.38 · 22.3% (65 of 291 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.33 · 35.1% (102 of 291 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.39 · 19.2% (56 of 291 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (39 of 291 decks)
- Decimator of the Provinces relevance 0.43 · 12.0% (35 of 291 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.39 · 18.9% (55 of 291 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.30 · 44.7% (130 of 291 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.39 · 16.8% (49 of 291 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.34 · 30.6% (89 of 291 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.36 · 25.1% (73 of 291 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.33 · 32.0% (93 of 291 decks)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (32 of 291 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (91 of 291 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (35 of 291 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.33 · 30.9% (90 of 291 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.36 · 24.1% (70 of 291 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.36 · 23.7% (69 of 291 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (48 of 291 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.41 · 12.7% (37 of 291 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.36 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 19.9% (58 of 291 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.38 · 15.8% (46 of 291 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (38 of 291 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.33 · 29.6% (86 of 291 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.27 · 63.6% (185 of 291 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.37 · 31.3% (91 of 291 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.35 · 37.8% (110 of 291 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.40 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.40 · 22.7% (66 of 291 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.38 · 27.5% (80 of 291 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (57 of 291 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.39 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.39 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.34 · 36.8% (107 of 291 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.32 · 43.0% (125 of 291 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.41 · 18.9% (55 of 291 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.36 · 29.6% (86 of 291 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.37 · 26.5% (77 of 291 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.40 · 20.6% (60 of 291 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.33 · 36.1% (105 of 291 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.40 · 18.6% (54 of 291 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.37 · 25.4% (74 of 291 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.35 · 30.2% (88 of 291 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.42 · 14.1% (41 of 291 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (42 of 291 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.40 · 16.2% (47 of 291 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.41 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (42 of 291 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.38 · 22.3% (65 of 291 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.33 · 35.1% (102 of 291 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (39 of 291 decks)
- Decimator of the Provinces relevance 0.43 · 12.0% (35 of 291 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.39 · 18.9% (55 of 291 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.30 · 44.7% (130 of 291 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.39 · 16.8% (49 of 291 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.34 · 30.6% (89 of 291 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.36 · 25.1% (73 of 291 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.33 · 32.0% (93 of 291 decks)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (32 of 291 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.33 · 30.9% (90 of 291 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.36 · 23.7% (69 of 291 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (48 of 291 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.41 · 12.7% (37 of 291 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.36 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.33 · 29.6% (86 of 291 decks)
- Mockery of Nature relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (28 of 291 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.39 · 14.4% (42 of 291 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (52 of 291 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (32 of 291 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.31 · 34.0% (99 of 291 decks)
- Lashweed Lurker relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (26 of 291 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (26 of 291 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.41 · 11.0% (32 of 291 decks)
All artifacts (47)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.39 · 19.2% (56 of 291 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.42 · 10.7% (31 of 291 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (52 of 291 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.43 · 7.2% (21 of 291 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.34 · 21.3% (62 of 291 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (28 of 291 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.41 · 8.2% (24 of 291 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.38 · 11.3% (33 of 291 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.32 · 20.3% (59 of 291 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.39 · 8.2% (24 of 291 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (26 of 291 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.40 · 5.2% (15 of 291 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (13 of 291 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (13 of 291 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.29 · 15.8% (46 of 291 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.25 · 19.9% (58 of 291 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.25 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.25 · 15.1% (44 of 291 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 16.2% (47 of 291 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Ingenuity Engine relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Darksteel Monolith relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.13 · 41.9% (122 of 291 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 59.5% (173 of 291 decks)
All enchantments (44)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (91 of 291 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.36 · 24.1% (70 of 291 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 19.9% (58 of 291 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.41 · 11.7% (34 of 291 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.28 · 41.6% (121 of 291 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.41 · 8.2% (24 of 291 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.41 · 7.2% (21 of 291 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.25 · 46.7% (136 of 291 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (40 of 291 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.25 · 34.0% (99 of 291 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.21 · 46.7% (136 of 291 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.23 · 39.2% (114 of 291 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (15 of 291 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (26 of 291 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.35 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Emrakul's Influence relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Lay Claim relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (23 of 291 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
All instants (50)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (35 of 291 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (38 of 291 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.37 · 10.7% (31 of 291 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (25 of 291 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (27 of 291 decks)
- Rowdy Research relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (18 of 291 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.27 · 19.9% (58 of 291 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (52 of 291 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.25 · 23.4% (68 of 291 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (22 of 291 decks)
- Into the Story relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.24 · 20.6% (60 of 291 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.24 · 19.2% (56 of 291 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.19 · 37.1% (108 of 291 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (33 of 291 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (28 of 291 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.23 · 12.4% (36 of 291 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (15 of 291 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.24 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.19 · 14.8% (43 of 291 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.16 · 27.5% (80 of 291 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Hunting Pack relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.18 · 9.6% (28 of 291 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.19 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.15 · 18.2% (53 of 291 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (27 of 291 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (15 of 291 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.38 · 15.8% (46 of 291 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.34 · 25.8% (75 of 291 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.39 · 12.7% (37 of 291 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.39 · 10.0% (29 of 291 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.38 · 10.7% (31 of 291 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (32 of 291 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (23 of 291 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.38 · 8.9% (26 of 291 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.34 · 12.4% (36 of 291 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.32 · 15.1% (44 of 291 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (18 of 291 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (21 of 291 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (27 of 291 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (22 of 291 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (29 of 291 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.26 · 32.3% (94 of 291 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (22 of 291 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (21 of 291 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (22 of 291 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.27 · 19.2% (56 of 291 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.30 · 12.7% (37 of 291 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.29 · 12.0% (35 of 291 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.31 · 9.3% (27 of 291 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (39 of 291 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.32 · 7.2% (21 of 291 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Growth Spasm relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (15 of 291 decks)
- Spitting Image relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.30 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.24 · 17.5% (51 of 291 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (27 of 291 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (23 of 291 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.19 · 39.9% (116 of 291 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (13 of 291 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (34 of 291 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (81 of 291 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (13 of 291 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.37 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (24 of 291 decks)
All utility lands (49)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.36 · 24.7% (72 of 291 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.36 · 17.9% (52 of 291 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.34 · 17.5% (51 of 291 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.31 · 24.1% (70 of 291 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.30 · 17.9% (52 of 291 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (13 of 291 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.25 · 35.1% (102 of 291 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.35 · 7.2% (21 of 291 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.34 · 8.6% (25 of 291 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (29 of 291 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.28 · 16.8% (49 of 291 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (23 of 291 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (13 of 291 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.27 · 16.2% (47 of 291 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.26 · 16.5% (48 of 291 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.26 · 15.5% (45 of 291 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.26 · 15.1% (44 of 291 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (13 of 291 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.31 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 16.8% (49 of 291 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.26 · 11.7% (34 of 291 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (91 of 291 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.22 · 18.2% (53 of 291 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (33 of 291 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.22 · 17.2% (50 of 291 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.33 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (24 of 291 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 15.1% (44 of 291 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (18 of 291 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 43.6% (127 of 291 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
All lands (50)
- Wastes relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.34 · 15.5% (45 of 291 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (19 of 291 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (27 of 291 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.31 · 15.1% (44 of 291 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (20 of 291 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.39 · 5.2% (15 of 291 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.29 · 19.2% (56 of 291 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.26 · 27.5% (80 of 291 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.27 · 20.6% (60 of 291 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (15 of 291 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.29 · 11.7% (34 of 291 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (26 of 291 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.26 · 16.2% (47 of 291 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.31 · 8.6% (25 of 291 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.24 · 20.6% (60 of 291 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.29 · 7.2% (21 of 291 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (22 of 291 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 42.6% (124 of 291 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.23 · 17.2% (50 of 291 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (31 of 291 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.22 · 21.0% (61 of 291 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (27 of 291 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (17 of 291 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (16 of 291 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.21 · 23.7% (69 of 291 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.18 · 36.8% (107 of 291 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.25 · 8.9% (26 of 291 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.18 · 32.0% (93 of 291 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (14 of 291 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (10 of 291 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (28 of 291 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (11 of 291 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (29 of 291 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (7 of 291 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.19 · 18.6% (54 of 291 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.15 · 43.6% (127 of 291 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (12 of 291 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (9 of 291 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (8 of 291 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.12 · 54.3% (158 of 291 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty, from 291 real Commander decks.