Cards like Rewind
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Frilled Mystic
19× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Sister of Silence
Cards like Growth Spiral
2.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 60%
- Eureka Moment 20%
- Joint Exploration 16%
Cards like Pongify
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 36%
- Rapid Hybridization 34%
Cards like Counterspell
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 58%
- Negate 30%
- Wash Away 3%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Spell Snare 3%
Other options: Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, Intervene, Nullify, Flash Counter, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, False Summoning, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Wavebreak Hippocamp
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wavebreak Hippocamp 49%
- Glademuse 13%
Cards like Brainstorm
5.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 56%
- Brainsurge 15%
Cards like Mystic Confluence
8.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Confluence 24%
- Sublime Epiphany 13%
- Cryptic Command 10%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 37%
- Elvish Mystic 30%
- Fyndhorn Elves 20%
- Boreal Druid 3%
- Gyre Engineer 1%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Rootrider Faun, Leaf Gilder, Golden Hind, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Woodland Mystic, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like High Fae Trickster
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
6.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Opt
8.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Naiad of Hidden Coves
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Uthros Psionicist, Highspire Bell-Ringer
Cards like Noxious Revival
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Dig Through Time
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dig Through Time 40%
- Impulse 10%
- Telling Time 1%
- Anticipate 1%
Other options: Experimental Augury
Cards like Aetherize
6.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 27%
- Evacuation 15%
- Perplexing Test 2%
Cards like Force of Will
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Force of Will 17%
- Force of Negation 16%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 23%
- Mystic Remora 22%
Cards like Mana Drain
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mana Drain 26%
- Plasm Capture 16%
Cards like Harrow
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Planar Engineering, Scapeshift
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Muse Seeker, Academy Wall, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Swan Song
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swan Song 34%
- Strix Serenade 4%
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Market Festival, Dawn's Reflection, Verdant Haven, Glittering Frost, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Worldly Tutor
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 21%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Reclamation Sage
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Reclamation Sage 21%
- Acidic Slime 4%
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Chomping Changeling, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Wilderness Reclamation
6.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.85 · 49.3% (618 of 1,253 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (231 of 1,253 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.76 · 25.9% (325 of 1,253 decks)
- Glademuse relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (157 of 1,253 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.62 · 38.8% (486 of 1,253 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.71 · 19.8% (248 of 1,253 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.63 · 30.5% (382 of 1,253 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.68 · 21.4% (268 of 1,253 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.78 · 10.7% (134 of 1,253 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.69 · 16.4% (205 of 1,253 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.53 · 40.1% (502 of 1,253 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.59 · 27.9% (349 of 1,253 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 58.2% (729 of 1,253 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 0.75 · 10.1% (126 of 1,253 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.53 · 35.0% (439 of 1,253 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.54 · 32.9% (412 of 1,253 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (146 of 1,253 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.68 · 11.7% (147 of 1,253 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.57 · 24.5% (307 of 1,253 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 0.71 · 9.6% (120 of 1,253 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.62 · 15.2% (190 of 1,253 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.78 · 5.0% (63 of 1,253 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (129 of 1,253 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (185 of 1,253 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (156 of 1,253 decks)
- Final-Word Phantom relevance 0.63 · 11.3% (141 of 1,253 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 18.1% (227 of 1,253 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.50 · 28.8% (361 of 1,253 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.65 · 9.7% (121 of 1,253 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.67 · 7.7% (97 of 1,253 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 23.3% (292 of 1,253 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.55 · 16.9% (212 of 1,253 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (123 of 1,253 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.66 · 7.3% (92 of 1,253 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 7.4% (93 of 1,253 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.47 · 30.0% (376 of 1,253 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 23.9% (300 of 1,253 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.53 · 16.3% (204 of 1,253 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.65 · 7.3% (91 of 1,253 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (83 of 1,253 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.42 · 36.5% (457 of 1,253 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 56.2% (704 of 1,253 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (175 of 1,253 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.45 · 27.9% (349 of 1,253 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.57 · 10.5% (132 of 1,253 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 21.5% (270 of 1,253 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (168 of 1,253 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (111 of 1,253 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 0.72 · 4.2% (52 of 1,253 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.61 · 6.1% (77 of 1,253 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.85 · 49.3% (618 of 1,253 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (231 of 1,253 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.76 · 25.9% (325 of 1,253 decks)
- Glademuse relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (157 of 1,253 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.71 · 19.8% (248 of 1,253 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.68 · 21.4% (268 of 1,253 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.78 · 10.7% (134 of 1,253 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.69 · 16.4% (205 of 1,253 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.59 · 27.9% (349 of 1,253 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 0.75 · 10.1% (126 of 1,253 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.57 · 24.5% (307 of 1,253 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 0.71 · 9.6% (120 of 1,253 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.78 · 5.0% (63 of 1,253 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (129 of 1,253 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (156 of 1,253 decks)
- Final-Word Phantom relevance 0.63 · 11.3% (141 of 1,253 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.67 · 7.7% (97 of 1,253 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 23.3% (292 of 1,253 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.55 · 16.9% (212 of 1,253 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 7.4% (93 of 1,253 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (83 of 1,253 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.45 · 27.9% (349 of 1,253 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (111 of 1,253 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 0.72 · 4.2% (52 of 1,253 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (131 of 1,253 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.53 · 9.3% (117 of 1,253 decks)
- Draining Whelk relevance 0.65 · 4.2% (53 of 1,253 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.31 · 51.0% (639 of 1,253 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.71 · 3.6% (45 of 1,253 decks)
- Winged Coatl relevance 0.60 · 4.6% (58 of 1,253 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.54 · 5.9% (74 of 1,253 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (76 of 1,253 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.39 · 21.9% (275 of 1,253 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.50 · 6.5% (81 of 1,253 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (67 of 1,253 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.30 · 44.3% (555 of 1,253 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 0.56 · 4.4% (55 of 1,253 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.48 · 7.8% (98 of 1,253 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.41 · 14.3% (179 of 1,253 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.50 · 5.4% (68 of 1,253 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (166 of 1,253 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.54 · 4.4% (55 of 1,253 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (74 of 1,253 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (135 of 1,253 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.53 · 4.4% (55 of 1,253 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.60 · 3.5% (44 of 1,253 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.35 · 22.3% (279 of 1,253 decks)
- Illusory Ambusher relevance 0.64 · 3.0% (38 of 1,253 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (265 of 1,253 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.29 · 34.5% (432 of 1,253 decks)
All artifacts (27)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.53 · 35.0% (439 of 1,253 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.62 · 15.2% (190 of 1,253 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (168 of 1,253 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.48 · 13.4% (168 of 1,253 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.50 · 11.0% (138 of 1,253 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.58 · 4.5% (57 of 1,253 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (110 of 1,253 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (177 of 1,253 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (34 of 1,253 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (34 of 1,253 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.27 · 24.9% (312 of 1,253 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (112 of 1,253 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (96 of 1,253 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 27.0% (338 of 1,253 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (59 of 1,253 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.32 · 7.2% (90 of 1,253 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (78 of 1,253 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (63 of 1,253 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.21 · 26.7% (335 of 1,253 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 17.0% (213 of 1,253 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (39 of 1,253 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (35 of 1,253 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (44 of 1,253 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (132 of 1,253 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (41 of 1,253 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 57.7% (723 of 1,253 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 75.9% (951 of 1,253 decks)
All enchantments (40)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 58.2% (729 of 1,253 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.54 · 32.9% (412 of 1,253 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.68 · 11.7% (147 of 1,253 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (123 of 1,253 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.66 · 7.3% (92 of 1,253 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.65 · 7.3% (91 of 1,253 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (175 of 1,253 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.63 · 4.6% (58 of 1,253 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.55 · 7.5% (94 of 1,253 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.38 · 27.9% (350 of 1,253 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (290 of 1,253 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.49 · 5.3% (67 of 1,253 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.54 · 4.2% (53 of 1,253 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.60 · 3.4% (43 of 1,253 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (142 of 1,253 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (161 of 1,253 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.44 · 6.2% (78 of 1,253 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.54 · 3.7% (46 of 1,253 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.54 · 3.4% (42 of 1,253 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.50 · 3.8% (47 of 1,253 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 22.2% (278 of 1,253 decks)
- Urban Burgeoning relevance 0.55 · 2.9% (36 of 1,253 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (122 of 1,253 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (68 of 1,253 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (41 of 1,253 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (48 of 1,253 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.25 · 22.5% (282 of 1,253 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.32 · 6.6% (83 of 1,253 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (116 of 1,253 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (45 of 1,253 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (54 of 1,253 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (39 of 1,253 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (41 of 1,253 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (39 of 1,253 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (36 of 1,253 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (40 of 1,253 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (32 of 1,253 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (43 of 1,253 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (36 of 1,253 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (43 of 1,253 decks)
All instants (50)
- Rewind relevance 0.62 · 38.8% (486 of 1,253 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.63 · 30.5% (382 of 1,253 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.53 · 40.1% (502 of 1,253 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (185 of 1,253 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 18.1% (227 of 1,253 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.50 · 28.8% (361 of 1,253 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.65 · 9.7% (121 of 1,253 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.47 · 30.0% (376 of 1,253 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 23.9% (300 of 1,253 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.53 · 16.3% (204 of 1,253 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.42 · 36.5% (457 of 1,253 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 56.2% (704 of 1,253 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.57 · 10.5% (132 of 1,253 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.61 · 6.1% (77 of 1,253 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (156 of 1,253 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (133 of 1,253 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.49 · 13.1% (164 of 1,253 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.41 · 27.1% (340 of 1,253 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (184 of 1,253 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.65 · 4.4% (55 of 1,253 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.52 · 10.1% (126 of 1,253 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.46 · 15.3% (192 of 1,253 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.57 · 6.5% (81 of 1,253 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.38 · 35.4% (443 of 1,253 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (195 of 1,253 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.40 · 28.0% (351 of 1,253 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.39 · 29.4% (368 of 1,253 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (124 of 1,253 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.45 · 14.3% (179 of 1,253 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (105 of 1,253 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (179 of 1,253 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.54 · 4.9% (61 of 1,253 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.44 · 13.5% (169 of 1,253 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.51 · 7.3% (91 of 1,253 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.34 · 34.6% (433 of 1,253 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.57 · 4.3% (54 of 1,253 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (146 of 1,253 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (121 of 1,253 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 23.8% (298 of 1,253 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.40 · 12.0% (150 of 1,253 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (129 of 1,253 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (113 of 1,253 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.33 · 26.6% (333 of 1,253 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (115 of 1,253 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (73 of 1,253 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.58 · 3.4% (42 of 1,253 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (68 of 1,253 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.35 · 16.0% (200 of 1,253 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.40 · 9.0% (113 of 1,253 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.36 · 13.1% (164 of 1,253 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (146 of 1,253 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 21.5% (270 of 1,253 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.55 · 6.3% (79 of 1,253 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.39 · 20.1% (252 of 1,253 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (91 of 1,253 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.47 · 7.9% (99 of 1,253 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 0.59 · 3.8% (48 of 1,253 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (73 of 1,253 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (64 of 1,253 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.36 · 15.7% (197 of 1,253 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (97 of 1,253 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (64 of 1,253 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (59 of 1,253 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (84 of 1,253 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.63 · 2.6% (33 of 1,253 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.40 · 5.3% (67 of 1,253 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (55 of 1,253 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.49 · 3.7% (46 of 1,253 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (50 of 1,253 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (60 of 1,253 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.33 · 10.1% (126 of 1,253 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.34 · 8.1% (102 of 1,253 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (48 of 1,253 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (36 of 1,253 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.49 · 2.8% (35 of 1,253 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (119 of 1,253 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (52 of 1,253 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (54 of 1,253 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (49 of 1,253 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (69 of 1,253 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (32 of 1,253 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (60 of 1,253 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (80 of 1,253 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.20 · 32.2% (403 of 1,253 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (33 of 1,253 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.21 · 27.6% (346 of 1,253 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.27 · 10.8% (135 of 1,253 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (41 of 1,253 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (61 of 1,253 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (55 of 1,253 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.18 · 38.9% (487 of 1,253 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (51 of 1,253 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 13.2% (165 of 1,253 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 34.8% (436 of 1,253 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (35 of 1,253 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (62 of 1,253 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (85 of 1,253 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (40 of 1,253 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (40 of 1,253 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (92 of 1,253 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (66 of 1,253 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.54 · 5.3% (67 of 1,253 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (103 of 1,253 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.48 · 4.0% (50 of 1,253 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (103 of 1,253 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.46 · 2.7% (34 of 1,253 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (32 of 1,253 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (46 of 1,253 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (124 of 1,253 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (192 of 1,253 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 38.8% (486 of 1,253 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.41 · 24.3% (304 of 1,253 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.42 · 15.5% (194 of 1,253 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.44 · 10.1% (127 of 1,253 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (140 of 1,253 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (125 of 1,253 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (313 of 1,253 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (177 of 1,253 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (184 of 1,253 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (376 of 1,253 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.40 · 4.8% (60 of 1,253 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.25 · 34.9% (437 of 1,253 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (89 of 1,253 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (87 of 1,253 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (65 of 1,253 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.26 · 24.3% (304 of 1,253 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (62 of 1,253 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.26 · 23.8% (298 of 1,253 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.43 · 3.5% (44 of 1,253 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (66 of 1,253 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (55 of 1,253 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.23 · 24.8% (311 of 1,253 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (39 of 1,253 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 18.7% (234 of 1,253 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (54 of 1,253 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (56 of 1,253 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (48 of 1,253 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (141 of 1,253 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.27 · 6.7% (84 of 1,253 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.18 · 32.1% (402 of 1,253 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (34 of 1,253 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (33 of 1,253 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (92 of 1,253 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (37 of 1,253 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (46 of 1,253 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (44 of 1,253 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (39 of 1,253 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 43.9% (550 of 1,253 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (89 of 1,253 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (44 of 1,253 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (81 of 1,253 decks)
All lands (45)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.34 · 16.3% (204 of 1,253 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 12.1% (151 of 1,253 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.33 · 18.1% (227 of 1,253 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.31 · 17.8% (223 of 1,253 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.30 · 21.1% (264 of 1,253 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (111 of 1,253 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.38 · 5.0% (63 of 1,253 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.31 · 12.9% (162 of 1,253 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.28 · 18.6% (233 of 1,253 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (82 of 1,253 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (81 of 1,253 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (136 of 1,253 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.31 · 11.2% (140 of 1,253 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (63 of 1,253 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.26 · 23.5% (295 of 1,253 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (119 of 1,253 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (69 of 1,253 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.24 · 21.0% (263 of 1,253 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (73 of 1,253 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (76 of 1,253 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.20 · 36.5% (457 of 1,253 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.26 · 11.5% (144 of 1,253 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.20 · 27.9% (349 of 1,253 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (68 of 1,253 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 16.0% (201 of 1,253 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.22 · 17.8% (223 of 1,253 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.16 · 45.7% (573 of 1,253 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (56 of 1,253 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.21 · 13.3% (167 of 1,253 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (106 of 1,253 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (113 of 1,253 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.20 · 14.5% (182 of 1,253 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.14 · 47.5% (595 of 1,253 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (71 of 1,253 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (41 of 1,253 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.15 · 34.9% (437 of 1,253 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 10.3% (129 of 1,253 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.13 · 50.5% (633 of 1,253 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.12 · 57.5% (720 of 1,253 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.13 · 43.5% (545 of 1,253 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.15 · 28.9% (362 of 1,253 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 63.9% (801 of 1,253 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 80.7% (1,011 of 1,253 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 86.0% (1,077 of 1,253 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 86.1% (1,079 of 1,253 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Rashmi, Eternities Crafter, from 1,253 real Commander decks.