Color Identity Spread
Commanders
1
Commanders
1All commanders (1)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.54 · 1.1% (2 of 174 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 1.42 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot relevance 1.33 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.24 · 63.9% (106 of 166 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.24 · 61.4% (102 of 166 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.23 · 66.3% (110 of 166 decks)
- Hexhaven Invigorator relevance 1.21 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.17 · 71.1% (118 of 166 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.09 · 53.6% (89 of 166 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.09 · 68.1% (113 of 166 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.09 · 52.4% (87 of 166 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 1.07 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.07 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.02 · 46.4% (77 of 166 decks)
- Six relevance 1.02 · 45.2% (75 of 166 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.00 · 58.4% (97 of 166 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.00 · 42.2% (70 of 166 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.98 · 53.0% (88 of 166 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.97 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.97 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.95 · 40.4% (67 of 166 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.94 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.94 · 49.4% (82 of 166 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 42.2% (70 of 166 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.88 · 47.6% (79 of 166 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 47.0% (78 of 166 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.85 · 47.6% (79 of 166 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.85 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.82 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.82 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.80 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
Creatures
25
Creatures
25 All creatures (25)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 1.42 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot relevance 1.33 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.23 · 66.3% (110 of 166 decks)
- Hexhaven Invigorator relevance 1.21 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.17 · 71.1% (118 of 166 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.09 · 53.6% (89 of 166 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.09 · 68.1% (113 of 166 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.09 · 52.4% (87 of 166 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 1.07 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.07 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.02 · 46.4% (77 of 166 decks)
- Six relevance 1.02 · 45.2% (75 of 166 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.97 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.97 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.94 · 49.4% (82 of 166 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 42.2% (70 of 166 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.88 · 47.6% (79 of 166 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 47.0% (78 of 166 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.85 · 47.6% (79 of 166 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.85 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.82 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.80 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.78 · 31.3% (52 of 166 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.74 · 35.5% (59 of 166 decks)
Artifacts
4
Artifacts
4 All artifacts (4)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.24 · 61.4% (102 of 166 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.98 · 53.0% (88 of 166 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.76 · 31.3% (52 of 166 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.70 · 16.9% (28 of 166 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.00 · 42.2% (70 of 166 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.94 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.78 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
Instants
2
Instants
2 All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.24 · 63.9% (106 of 166 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.77 · 49.4% (82 of 166 decks)
Sorceries
5
Sorceries
5 All sorceries (5)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.00 · 58.4% (97 of 166 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.95 · 40.4% (67 of 166 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.82 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.80 · 38.6% (64 of 166 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.72 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
Utility Lands
6
Utility Lands
6 All utility lands (6)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.98 · 42.8% (71 of 166 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.90 · 34.9% (58 of 166 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.81 · 45.2% (75 of 166 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.80 · 19.9% (33 of 166 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.77 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.77 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
Lands
5
Lands
5 All lands (5)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.90 · 34.9% (58 of 166 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.86 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.78 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.71 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.70 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
EDH data for Marwyn, the Preserver: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 166 real decks.




















































