Return of the Mole Man
Played in 58 Gruul decks
130+24+4+5+2+3+5+7+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Mole Man, Moloid Master 82.8% of decks
Mole Man, Moloid Master 82.8% of decks
Icetill Explorer 82.8% of decks
Icetill Explorer 82.8% of decks
Aftermath Analyst 62.1% of decks
Aftermath Analyst 62.1% of decks
Lumra, Bellow of the Woods 58.6% of decks
Lumra, Bellow of the Woods 58.6% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 62.1% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 62.1% of decks
Valakut Exploration 58.6% of decks
Valakut Exploration 58.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 3.80 · 82.8% (48 of 58 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 2.53 · 82.8% (48 of 58 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 2.23 · 62.1% (36 of 58 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 2.19 · 58.6% (34 of 58 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.83 · 62.1% (36 of 58 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.78 · 58.6% (34 of 58 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.53 · 67.2% (39 of 58 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.52 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.51 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.46 · 63.8% (37 of 58 decks)
- Six relevance 1.44 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.43 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.43 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 1.42 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.42 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.39 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.36 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.31 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.30 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.30 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.25 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.23 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.22 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.22 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.21 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 1.21 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.16 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.16 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.16 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.11 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 3.80 · 82.8% (48 of 58 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 2.53 · 82.8% (48 of 58 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 2.23 · 62.1% (36 of 58 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 2.19 · 58.6% (34 of 58 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.83 · 62.1% (36 of 58 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.53 · 67.2% (39 of 58 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.52 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.46 · 63.8% (37 of 58 decks)
- Six relevance 1.44 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.43 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.30 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.30 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.25 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.22 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.22 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.21 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 1.21 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.16 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.16 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 1.10 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.02 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.98 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.98 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.92 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.43 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.42 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.11 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.97 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.78 · 58.6% (34 of 58 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.51 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 1.42 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.39 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 1.04 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.31 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.98 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.36 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.23 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.16 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 1.31 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.22 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 1.19 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.18 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.97 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
All lands (7)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 1.10 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.02 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.98 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.97 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.94 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.93 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.91 · 55.2% (32 of 58 decks)
EDH data for Return of the Mole Man: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 58 real decks.











































