Caustic Crawler
Played in 82 Abzan decks
Color Identity Spread
5.1% Abzan
- Golgari 519 · 32.4%
- Black 512 · 31.9%
- Sultai 176 · 11.0%
- Jund 140 · 8.7%
- Abzan 82 · 5.1%
- Orzhov 44 · 2.7%
- Other (10) 130 · 8.1%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.49 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.97 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 1.83 · 51.2% (42 of 82 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.64 · 51.2% (42 of 82 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 1.62 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.59 · 63.4% (52 of 82 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.57 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Admonition Angel relevance 1.51 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 1.43 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.38 · 51.2% (42 of 82 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.35 · 54.9% (45 of 82 decks)
- Canyon Jerboa relevance 1.26 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.22 · 50.0% (41 of 82 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.21 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 1.21 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 1.20 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.18 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Kazandu Nectarpot relevance 1.16 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 1.14 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.13 · 41.5% (34 of 82 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 1.12 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.04 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.00 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.96 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.96 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.95 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.94 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.94 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.97 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 1.83 · 51.2% (42 of 82 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.64 · 51.2% (42 of 82 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.59 · 63.4% (52 of 82 decks)
- Admonition Angel relevance 1.51 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 1.43 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.38 · 51.2% (42 of 82 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.35 · 54.9% (45 of 82 decks)
- Canyon Jerboa relevance 1.26 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 1.21 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 1.20 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Kazandu Nectarpot relevance 1.16 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 1.14 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.13 · 41.5% (34 of 82 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.04 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.00 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.96 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.94 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.94 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.93 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.92 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.86 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.82 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.81 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Bloodghast relevance 0.79 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.77 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Glyph Elemental relevance 0.76 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 0.73 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.21 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.90 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.90 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 1.62 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.57 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.22 · 50.0% (41 of 82 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.18 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 1.12 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.96 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.95 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.90 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 0.88 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.90 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.87 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
All lands (3)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.82 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.79 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.74 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
EDH data for Caustic Crawler: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 82 real decks.