Caustic Crawler
Played in 165 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
10.6% Sultai
- Golgari 507 · 32.7%
- Black 492 · 31.7%
- Sultai 165 · 10.6%
- Jund 139 · 9.0%
- Abzan 81 · 5.2%
- Orzhov 44 · 2.8%
- Other (10) 122 · 7.9%
All most relevant (30)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 2.02 · 37.0% (61 of 165 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 1.77 · 49.1% (81 of 165 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.74 · 51.5% (85 of 165 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.73 · 57.6% (95 of 165 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 1.61 · 40.0% (66 of 165 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.57 · 64.8% (107 of 165 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 1.49 · 32.7% (54 of 165 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.48 · 61.8% (102 of 165 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 1.43 · 59.4% (98 of 165 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.36 · 69.7% (115 of 165 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.36 · 30.9% (51 of 165 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.26 · 24.2% (40 of 165 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.26 · 50.3% (83 of 165 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.24 · 28.5% (47 of 165 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.22 · 26.1% (43 of 165 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.21 · 26.1% (43 of 165 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.19 · 37.0% (61 of 165 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.13 · 45.5% (75 of 165 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 1.13 · 26.7% (44 of 165 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.06 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 1.03 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.01 · 24.8% (41 of 165 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.00 · 31.5% (52 of 165 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.00 · 23.6% (39 of 165 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.98 · 44.8% (74 of 165 decks)
- Roil Cartographer relevance 0.97 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (25 of 165 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.96 · 21.2% (35 of 165 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.96 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.94 · 27.9% (46 of 165 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 2.02 · 37.0% (61 of 165 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.73 · 57.6% (95 of 165 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 1.61 · 40.0% (66 of 165 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.57 · 64.8% (107 of 165 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 1.49 · 32.7% (54 of 165 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.48 · 61.8% (102 of 165 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 1.43 · 59.4% (98 of 165 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.36 · 69.7% (115 of 165 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.36 · 30.9% (51 of 165 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.26 · 50.3% (83 of 165 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.21 · 26.1% (43 of 165 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.19 · 37.0% (61 of 165 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.13 · 45.5% (75 of 165 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.06 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.01 · 24.8% (41 of 165 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.00 · 31.5% (52 of 165 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.98 · 44.8% (74 of 165 decks)
- Roil Cartographer relevance 0.97 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (25 of 165 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.96 · 21.2% (35 of 165 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.96 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.94 · 27.9% (46 of 165 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.91 · 36.4% (60 of 165 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.89 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.88 · 25.5% (42 of 165 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.86 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.84 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.83 · 13.3% (22 of 165 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.82 · 13.9% (23 of 165 decks)
- Baloth Woodcrasher relevance 0.79 · 11.5% (19 of 165 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.76 · 24.2% (40 of 165 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.74 · 42.4% (70 of 165 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (22 of 165 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.26 · 24.2% (40 of 165 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.79 · 12.1% (20 of 165 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.76 · 12.1% (20 of 165 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.72 · 11.5% (19 of 165 decks)
All enchantments (10)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 1.77 · 49.1% (81 of 165 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.74 · 51.5% (85 of 165 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.24 · 28.5% (47 of 165 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.22 · 26.1% (43 of 165 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 1.03 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.00 · 23.6% (39 of 165 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.84 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Soul Stair Expedition relevance 0.79 · 11.5% (19 of 165 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.78 · 15.8% (26 of 165 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.75 · 15.8% (26 of 165 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 1.13 · 26.7% (44 of 165 decks)
All lands (2)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.74 · 33.9% (56 of 165 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.71 · 34.5% (57 of 165 decks)
EDH data for Caustic Crawler: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 165 real decks.