Tectonic Edge
Played in 558 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.8% Simic
- Five-Color 5,203 · 25.8%
- Colorless 1,990 · 9.9%
- Green 1,142 · 5.7%
- White 1,080 · 5.4%
- Red 1,022 · 5.1%
- Black 786 · 3.9%
- Blue 732 · 3.6%
- Golgari 731 · 3.6%
- Gruul 690 · 3.4%
- Jund 606 · 3.0%
- Azorius 601 · 3.0%
- Simic 558 · 2.8%
- Rakdos 435 · 2.2%
- Sultai 426 · 2.1%
- Orzhov 414 · 2.1%
- Boros 407 · 2.0%
- Other (16) 3,356 · 16.6%
All commanders (12)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.87 · 3.9% (34 of 875 decks)
- Verazol, the Split Current relevance 1.55 · 3.7% (19 of 515 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.94 · 1.0% (20 of 1,916 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.76 · 4.3% (3 of 69 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.76 · 9.5% (2 of 21 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.62 · 1.3% (5 of 376 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.45 · 1.2% (3 of 255 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.26 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.23 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
All most relevant (24)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.48 · 18.1% (101 of 558 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.45 · 22.2% (124 of 558 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.45 · 32.6% (182 of 558 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.45 · 19.9% (111 of 558 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.44 · 12.7% (71 of 558 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (105 of 558 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.43 · 18.3% (102 of 558 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (105 of 558 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.42 · 20.3% (113 of 558 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.42 · 26.3% (147 of 558 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.42 · 19.2% (107 of 558 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.41 · 24.7% (138 of 558 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.41 · 21.1% (118 of 558 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.39 · 21.0% (117 of 558 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.39 · 14.5% (81 of 558 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.38 · 9.5% (53 of 558 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (86 of 558 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (83 of 558 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (60 of 558 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (107 of 558 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (116 of 558 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.36 · 16.1% (90 of 558 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.36 · 15.2% (85 of 558 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.36 · 16.8% (94 of 558 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.48 · 18.1% (101 of 558 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.45 · 22.2% (124 of 558 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.45 · 32.6% (182 of 558 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.44 · 12.7% (71 of 558 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (105 of 558 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (105 of 558 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.42 · 20.3% (113 of 558 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.41 · 21.1% (118 of 558 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.39 · 21.0% (117 of 558 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.39 · 14.5% (81 of 558 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.38 · 9.5% (53 of 558 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (107 of 558 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.36 · 15.2% (85 of 558 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.36 · 16.8% (94 of 558 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (60 of 558 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Exploration relevance 0.45 · 19.9% (111 of 558 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (83 of 558 decks)
All instants (6)
- Harrow relevance 0.43 · 18.3% (102 of 558 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.42 · 26.3% (147 of 558 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.42 · 19.2% (107 of 558 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.41 · 24.7% (138 of 558 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (86 of 558 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.36 · 16.1% (90 of 558 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Explore relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (116 of 558 decks)
All utility lands (18)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.86 · 19.5% (109 of 558 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.82 · 24.2% (135 of 558 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.64 · 17.4% (97 of 558 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.52 · 11.1% (62 of 558 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.52 · 16.8% (94 of 558 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (45 of 558 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.49 · 26.0% (145 of 558 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.46 · 19.2% (107 of 558 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (64 of 558 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (63 of 558 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (69 of 558 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.41 · 12.2% (68 of 558 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (54 of 558 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.41 · 9.5% (53 of 558 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.39 · 22.8% (127 of 558 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (72 of 558 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (51 of 558 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 16.5% (92 of 558 decks)
All lands (8)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.52 · 32.3% (180 of 558 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.50 · 31.4% (175 of 558 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 26.5% (148 of 558 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.44 · 14.5% (81 of 558 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.36 · 8.8% (49 of 558 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.36 · 29.0% (162 of 558 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.36 · 27.2% (152 of 558 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (116 of 558 decks)
EDH data for Tectonic Edge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 558 real decks.