Color Identity Spread
3.3% Sultai
-
Colorless 29,525 · 18.7%
-
Black 17,796 · 11.3%
-
Green 12,789 · 8.1%
-
Five-Color 11,526 · 7.3%
-
Simic 8,182 · 5.2%
-
White 7,384 · 4.7%
-
Blue 7,172 · 4.5%
-
Red 5,964 · 3.8%
-
Golgari 5,515 · 3.5%
-
Abzan 5,337 · 3.4%
-
Sultai 5,208 · 3.3%
-
Gruul 4,498 · 2.9%
-
Jund 4,025 · 2.6%
-
Orzhov 3,342 · 2.1%
- Other (18) 29,494 · 18.7%
3026+13+3+3+1+6+10+14+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.62 · 35.1% (986 of 2,807 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 1.86 · 11.5% (247 of 2,147 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.76 · 24.6% (44 of 179 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 1.37 · 4.2% (1,145 of 27,401 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 1.19 · 5.4% (187 of 3,448 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.15 · 3.8% (524 of 13,828 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.06 · 3.5% (460 of 13,224 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.04 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 0.89 · 3.5% (169 of 4,823 decks)
- Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 0.88 · 3.7% (128 of 3,468 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.75 · 2.6% (189 of 7,185 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.68 · 15.2% (5 of 33 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.68 · 3.3% (55 of 1,656 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.66 · 3.7% (37 of 998 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.55 · 6.3% (8 of 126 decks)
- Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 0.53 · 2.2% (64 of 2,889 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.49 · 22.2% (2 of 9 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.45 · 5.5% (6 of 110 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.40 · 1.5% (61 of 3,988 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.39 · 1.6% (49 of 3,022 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (2 of 22 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Teval, Arbiter of Virtue relevance 0.30 · 1.3% (37 of 2,924 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (43 of 3,791 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (8 of 363 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.22 · 1.3% (13 of 1,027 decks)
- Volrath, the Shapestealer relevance 0.22 · 1.0% (21 of 2,015 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Spelunking relevance 1.05 · 35.0% (1,825 of 5,208 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.04 · 48.2% (2,512 of 5,208 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.03 · 26.6% (1,387 of 5,208 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.01 · 26.0% (1,356 of 5,208 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.83 · 21.2% (1,103 of 5,208 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.81 · 18.1% (943 of 5,208 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.81 · 41.4% (2,155 of 5,208 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.80 · 32.3% (1,680 of 5,208 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.80 · 18.4% (957 of 5,208 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.79 · 33.1% (1,725 of 5,208 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.79 · 17.6% (919 of 5,208 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.78 · 31.2% (1,624 of 5,208 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 43.7% (2,278 of 5,208 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.74 · 30.8% (1,604 of 5,208 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.74 · 16.5% (859 of 5,208 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.74 · 16.3% (847 of 5,208 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (1,069 of 5,208 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.73 · 25.8% (1,345 of 5,208 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.73 · 20.7% (1,076 of 5,208 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 16.9% (882 of 5,208 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.71 · 15.7% (818 of 5,208 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 27.7% (1,445 of 5,208 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.68 · 25.5% (1,327 of 5,208 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.67 · 14.7% (763 of 5,208 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (1,465 of 5,208 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (880 of 5,208 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.81 · 41.4% (2,155 of 5,208 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.80 · 32.3% (1,680 of 5,208 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.79 · 17.6% (919 of 5,208 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.78 · 31.2% (1,624 of 5,208 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 43.7% (2,278 of 5,208 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.74 · 30.8% (1,604 of 5,208 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.73 · 25.8% (1,345 of 5,208 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 16.9% (882 of 5,208 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.71 · 15.7% (818 of 5,208 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 27.7% (1,445 of 5,208 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.68 · 25.5% (1,327 of 5,208 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.67 · 14.7% (763 of 5,208 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (1,465 of 5,208 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.03 · 26.6% (1,387 of 5,208 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.74 · 16.3% (847 of 5,208 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (1,069 of 5,208 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Spelunking relevance 1.05 · 35.0% (1,825 of 5,208 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.81 · 18.1% (943 of 5,208 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.79 · 33.1% (1,725 of 5,208 decks)
All instants (1)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.04 · 48.2% (2,512 of 5,208 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.01 · 26.0% (1,356 of 5,208 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.83 · 21.2% (1,103 of 5,208 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.80 · 18.4% (957 of 5,208 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.74 · 16.5% (859 of 5,208 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.73 · 20.7% (1,076 of 5,208 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (880 of 5,208 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.10 · 33.3% (1,734 of 5,208 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.10 · 33.7% (1,753 of 5,208 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.97 · 23.5% (1,225 of 5,208 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.97 · 23.3% (1,216 of 5,208 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.96 · 23.3% (1,212 of 5,208 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.95 · 40.1% (2,086 of 5,208 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.81 · 20.7% (1,076 of 5,208 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.77 · 38.1% (1,985 of 5,208 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.68 · 38.3% (1,993 of 5,208 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.67 · 36.6% (1,907 of 5,208 decks)
All lands (14)
- Vesuva relevance 1.06 · 28.3% (1,474 of 5,208 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.98 · 24.0% (1,249 of 5,208 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.98 · 23.9% (1,243 of 5,208 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.95 · 23.8% (1,242 of 5,208 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.95 · 23.9% (1,245 of 5,208 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.94 · 23.9% (1,244 of 5,208 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.93 · 21.8% (1,135 of 5,208 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.89 · 21.8% (1,133 of 5,208 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.88 · 18.7% (972 of 5,208 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.84 · 23.9% (1,246 of 5,208 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.83 · 24.1% (1,255 of 5,208 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.82 · 24.3% (1,265 of 5,208 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (978 of 5,208 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 0.70 · 14.8% (769 of 5,208 decks)
EDH data for Urza's Cave: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,208 real decks.


















































































