Color Identity Spread
5.2% Simic
- Colorless 29,201 · 18.7%
- Black 17,672 · 11.3%
- Green 12,698 · 8.1%
- Five-Color 11,454 · 7.3%
- Simic 8,136 · 5.2%
- White 7,217 · 4.6%
- Blue 7,129 · 4.6%
- Red 5,917 · 3.8%
- Golgari 5,484 · 3.5%
- Abzan 5,310 · 3.4%
- Sultai 5,179 · 3.3%
- Gruul 4,464 · 2.9%
- Jund 4,001 · 2.6%
- Orzhov 3,316 · 2.1%
- Other (18) 29,275 · 18.7%
All commanders (30)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.81 · 42.2% (2,957 of 7,006 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.70 · 18.0% (158 of 879 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 1.68 · 12.5% (408 of 3,264 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.58 · 15.0% (173 of 1,151 decks)
- Absorbing Man relevance 1.46 · 21.4% (55 of 257 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 1.44 · 8.4% (595 of 7,067 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.37 · 13.2% (117 of 889 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.33 · 17.4% (56 of 321 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.30 · 30.4% (21 of 69 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 1.17 · 8.2% (194 of 2,365 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 1.13 · 11.6% (67 of 578 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.06 · 6.2% (292 of 4,724 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.01 · 5.1% (470 of 9,235 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.97 · 8.3% (77 of 928 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.93 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.88 · 7.1% (75 of 1,058 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.87 · 35.3% (6 of 17 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.80 · 6.1% (73 of 1,196 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.79 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.78 · 5.3% (101 of 1,921 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.73 · 7.6% (31 of 408 decks)
- Aloy, Savior of Meridian relevance 0.72 · 3.6% (269 of 7,455 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.69 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 0.69 · 5.2% (63 of 1,213 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.68 · 7.2% (27 of 376 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.67 · 4.0% (123 of 3,082 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.65 · 4.9% (58 of 1,185 decks)
- Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut relevance 0.65 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.61 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.54 · 8.0% (11 of 138 decks)
All most relevant (21)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.27 · 38.5% (3,136 of 8,136 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.23 · 39.1% (3,183 of 8,136 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.05 · 28.8% (2,345 of 8,136 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.05 · 47.2% (3,844 of 8,136 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.99 · 26.9% (2,190 of 8,136 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.96 · 26.0% (2,112 of 8,136 decks)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 0.96 · 24.2% (1,965 of 8,136 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.89 · 34.7% (2,825 of 8,136 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.89 · 23.0% (1,873 of 8,136 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.85 · 27.2% (2,212 of 8,136 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.78 · 22.1% (1,799 of 8,136 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 0.78 · 17.7% (1,442 of 8,136 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (1,692 of 8,136 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.73 · 18.1% (1,469 of 8,136 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.72 · 27.2% (2,215 of 8,136 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.70 · 23.3% (1,892 of 8,136 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.70 · 31.1% (2,527 of 8,136 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.69 · 26.0% (2,112 of 8,136 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.68 · 25.9% (2,111 of 8,136 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.67 · 24.9% (2,026 of 8,136 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.67 · 14.7% (1,193 of 8,136 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.99 · 26.9% (2,190 of 8,136 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.96 · 26.0% (2,112 of 8,136 decks)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 0.96 · 24.2% (1,965 of 8,136 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.89 · 34.7% (2,825 of 8,136 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.78 · 22.1% (1,799 of 8,136 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 0.78 · 17.7% (1,442 of 8,136 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (1,692 of 8,136 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.73 · 18.1% (1,469 of 8,136 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.72 · 27.2% (2,215 of 8,136 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.70 · 31.1% (2,527 of 8,136 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.69 · 26.0% (2,112 of 8,136 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.68 · 25.9% (2,111 of 8,136 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.67 · 14.7% (1,193 of 8,136 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.27 · 38.5% (3,136 of 8,136 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Copy Land relevance 0.89 · 23.0% (1,873 of 8,136 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.85 · 27.2% (2,212 of 8,136 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.05 · 47.2% (3,844 of 8,136 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.70 · 23.3% (1,892 of 8,136 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.23 · 39.1% (3,183 of 8,136 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.05 · 28.8% (2,345 of 8,136 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.67 · 24.9% (2,026 of 8,136 decks)
All utility lands (15)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.52 · 51.8% (4,215 of 8,136 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.39 · 48.7% (3,962 of 8,136 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 1.26 · 32.4% (2,636 of 8,136 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 1.24 · 36.0% (2,931 of 8,136 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.20 · 33.4% (2,720 of 8,136 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.95 · 23.2% (1,889 of 8,136 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.91 · 27.8% (2,261 of 8,136 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.90 · 51.8% (4,214 of 8,136 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 0.84 · 21.6% (1,757 of 8,136 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.76 · 19.8% (1,609 of 8,136 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.73 · 15.6% (1,271 of 8,136 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.70 · 15.6% (1,269 of 8,136 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.70 · 20.1% (1,632 of 8,136 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.69 · 23.5% (1,909 of 8,136 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.68 · 16.9% (1,374 of 8,136 decks)
All lands (14)
- Vesuva relevance 1.51 · 48.5% (3,948 of 8,136 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 1.42 · 44.2% (3,598 of 8,136 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 1.38 · 42.7% (3,475 of 8,136 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 1.38 · 42.7% (3,471 of 8,136 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 1.33 · 34.7% (2,823 of 8,136 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.30 · 36.6% (2,979 of 8,136 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 1.27 · 36.5% (2,968 of 8,136 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.26 · 42.5% (3,456 of 8,136 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 1.00 · 26.9% (2,187 of 8,136 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (1,674 of 8,136 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.80 · 17.9% (1,453 of 8,136 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.79 · 18.5% (1,502 of 8,136 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.78 · 18.1% (1,471 of 8,136 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.72 · 27.6% (2,248 of 8,136 decks)
EDH data for Urza's Cave: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 8,136 real decks.