Cards like Dimir Signet
16× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
83% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Dimir Signet 83%
- Simic Signet 67%
- Golgari Signet 50%
Cards like Kodama's Reach
2.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 52% of other Sultai decks
83% of decks run two or more
vs. 32% of other Sultai decks
2.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.97 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Kodama's Reach 83%
- Cultivate 83%
- Rampant Growth 67%
- They Went This Way 17%
- Explosive Vegetation 17%
Other options: Traverse the Outlands, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Grow from the Ashes, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Search for Tomorrow, Shared Roots, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, Boundless Realms, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Corpsejack Menace
18× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Sultai decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
6.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Sultai decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 83%
- Lightning Greaves 50%
Cards like Negate
3.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Negate 50%
- Counterspell 50%
- Remove Soul 17%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Part the Waterveil
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Dismiss
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Grip of Amnesia, Bind, Bone to Ash, Scatter Arc, Keep Safe, Laquatus's Disdain, Disrupt, Interdict, Contradict, Halt Order, Squelch, Confound, Remand
Cards like Time Stretch
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Time Stretch 17%
- Time Warp 17%
Other options: Temporal Manipulation, Capture of Jingzhou, Savor the Moment
Cards like Hydra's Growth
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Disallow
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Mizzium Skin
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Mizzium Skin 17%
- Octopus Form 17%
- Magic Damper 17%
Other options: Dive Down, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration, Shore Up
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Sultai decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.59 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 67%
- Elvish Mystic 17%
- Urborg Elf 17%
- Fyndhorn Elves 17%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Bog Initiate, Boreal Druid, Llanowar Dead, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Diabolic Tutor
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Diabolic Tutor 17%
- Demonic Tutor 17%
Other options: Razaketh's Rite, Rhystic Tutor, Demonic Collusion, Mastermind's Acquisition, Illicit Shipment, Demonic Bargain, Behold the Beyond, Diabolic Revelation
Cards like Feed the Swarm
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Pongify
10× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Pongify 17%
- Rapid Hybridization 17%
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
9.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Snakeskin Veil 50%
- Blossoming Defense 17%
Other options: Tyvar's Stand, Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit, Overprotect
Cards like Sol Ring
3.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
2.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Branching Evolution
2.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 50%
- Mystic Remora 17%
All top picks (50)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.29 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.18 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.25 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Crux of Fate relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Hagra Constrictor relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Drown in Ichor relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Ancient Bronze Dragon relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Necropolis Regent relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Weaver of Currents relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Without Weakness relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nightshade Harvester relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Entrails Feaster relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Timestream Navigator relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Mindlock Orb relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.29 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.25 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Hagra Constrictor relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Ancient Bronze Dragon relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Necropolis Regent relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Timestream Navigator relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Weaver of Currents relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Entrails Feaster relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nightshade Harvester relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Inventive Iteration // Living Breakthrough relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Plumecreed Escort relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Torrent Elemental relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Verdurous Gearhulk relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- The Haunt of Hightower relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.09 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Scavenger Regent // Exude Toxin relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.09 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All artifacts (40)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.18 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Mindlock Orb relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Drake-Skull Cameo relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Dragonstorm Globe relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Team Pennant relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Ring of Kalonia relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.08 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.05 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 0.08 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Mask of Riddles relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.06 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.02 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Dragonfire Blade relevance 0.03 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.02 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
All enchantments (37)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Song of Freyalise relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Leyline Immersion relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Bounty of the Luxa relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.10 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Pernicious Deed relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Eternal Thirst relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Phyresis relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Cloak of Mists relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.04 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.03 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All instants (50)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Without Weakness relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.08 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.07 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.05 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.05 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Crux of Fate relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Drown in Ichor relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Come Back Wrong relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.07 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.06 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.06 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.03 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All utility lands (31)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Hissing Quagmire relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Spymaster's Vault relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.06 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.06 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All lands (48)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.10 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.07 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.06 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Tainted Wood relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.05 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.04 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.04 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Woodland Cemetery relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.04 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.04 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.03 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.03 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.04 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.03 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.03 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.03 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Swamp relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Island relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Vorosh, the Hunter, from 6 real Commander decks.