Laquatus's Disdain
Played in 107 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
107 decks
- Azorius 49 · 45.8%
- Blue 26 · 24.3%
- Dimir 9 · 8.4%
- Sultai 8 · 7.5%
- Simic 4 · 3.7%
- Esper 3 · 2.8%
- Other (6) 8 · 7.5%
Commanders
3
Commanders
3All commanders (3)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 1.66 · 3.8% (4 of 104 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.93 · 1.4% (2 of 139 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.90 · 1.3% (2 of 160 decks)
Parallel Cards
30
Parallel Cards
All parallel cards (30)
- Grip of Amnesia
- Squelch
- Confound
- Remand
- Keep Safe
- Exclude
- Bone to Ash
- Disrupt
- Runeboggle
- Think Twice
- Dismiss
- Cremate
- Halt Order
- Rakshasa's Disdain
- Countervailing Winds
- Glimpse of Freedom
- Dream Fracture
- Bind
- Contradict
- Interdict
- Hindering Light
- Scatter Arc
- Radical Idea
- Learn from the Past
- Plunder the Trollshaws
- Soul Read
- Oona's Grace
- Clear the Mind
- Prologue to Phyresis
- Refocus
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 4.15 · 49.5% (53 of 107 decks)
- Interdict relevance 3.57 · 39.3% (42 of 107 decks)
- Halt Order relevance 3.39 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Force Void relevance 3.28 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Confound relevance 3.14 · 44.9% (48 of 107 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 3.01 · 50.5% (54 of 107 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.99 · 35.5% (38 of 107 decks)
- Failed Inspection relevance 2.99 · 33.6% (36 of 107 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.90 · 40.2% (43 of 107 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 2.85 · 30.8% (33 of 107 decks)
- Jaded Response relevance 2.80 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Frantic Inventory relevance 2.79 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 2.78 · 28.0% (30 of 107 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.78 · 41.1% (44 of 107 decks)
- Leave in the Dust relevance 2.77 · 29.9% (32 of 107 decks)
- Lunar Rejection relevance 2.73 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Exclude relevance 2.71 · 40.2% (43 of 107 decks)
- Laquatus's Creativity relevance 2.65 · 29.9% (32 of 107 decks)
- Hydrolash relevance 2.65 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Liquify relevance 2.64 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Squelch relevance 2.64 · 29.0% (31 of 107 decks)
- Ertai's Trickery relevance 2.62 · 23.4% (25 of 107 decks)
- Inaction Injunction relevance 2.62 · 30.8% (33 of 107 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 2.61 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Foreshadow relevance 2.60 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Illuminated Wings relevance 2.56 · 23.4% (25 of 107 decks)
- Fold into Aether relevance 2.55 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Kingfisher relevance 2.55 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.54 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Lay Bare relevance 2.54 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
Creatures
5
Creatures
5 All creatures (5)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 2.78 · 28.0% (30 of 107 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 2.61 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Kingfisher relevance 2.55 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 2.43 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 2.40 · 21.5% (23 of 107 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Illuminated Wings relevance 2.56 · 23.4% (25 of 107 decks)
- Lashknife Barrier relevance 2.45 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Customs Depot relevance 2.42 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
Instants
36
Instants
36 All instants (36)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 4.15 · 49.5% (53 of 107 decks)
- Interdict relevance 3.57 · 39.3% (42 of 107 decks)
- Halt Order relevance 3.39 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Force Void relevance 3.28 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Confound relevance 3.14 · 44.9% (48 of 107 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 3.01 · 50.5% (54 of 107 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.99 · 35.5% (38 of 107 decks)
- Failed Inspection relevance 2.99 · 33.6% (36 of 107 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.90 · 40.2% (43 of 107 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 2.85 · 30.8% (33 of 107 decks)
- Jaded Response relevance 2.80 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Frantic Inventory relevance 2.79 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.78 · 41.1% (44 of 107 decks)
- Leave in the Dust relevance 2.77 · 29.9% (32 of 107 decks)
- Lunar Rejection relevance 2.73 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Exclude relevance 2.71 · 40.2% (43 of 107 decks)
- Hydrolash relevance 2.65 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Liquify relevance 2.64 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Squelch relevance 2.64 · 29.0% (31 of 107 decks)
- Ertai's Trickery relevance 2.62 · 23.4% (25 of 107 decks)
- Foreshadow relevance 2.60 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Fold into Aether relevance 2.55 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.54 · 32.7% (35 of 107 decks)
- Lay Bare relevance 2.54 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Outwit relevance 2.52 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.50 · 33.6% (36 of 107 decks)
- Runeboggle relevance 2.50 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Festival of the Guildpact relevance 2.50 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Gallantry relevance 2.49 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Grip of the Roil relevance 2.46 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Everdream relevance 2.43 · 29.0% (31 of 107 decks)
- Spell Contortion relevance 2.42 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.41 · 38.3% (41 of 107 decks)
- Glimpse of Freedom relevance 2.41 · 28.0% (30 of 107 decks)
- Bewilder relevance 2.40 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.39 · 33.6% (36 of 107 decks)
Sorceries
6
Sorceries
6 All sorceries (6)
- Laquatus's Creativity relevance 2.65 · 29.9% (32 of 107 decks)
- Inaction Injunction relevance 2.62 · 30.8% (33 of 107 decks)
- Huddle Up relevance 2.53 · 28.0% (30 of 107 decks)
- Johann's Stopgap relevance 2.50 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- False Dawn relevance 2.43 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Touch of Invisibility relevance 2.42 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
EDH data for Laquatus's Disdain: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 107 real decks.






































































