Cards like Cultivate
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
91% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Simic decks
85% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
3.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.3 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 73%
- Kodama's Reach 67%
- Rampant Growth 41%
- Search for Tomorrow 32%
- Migration Path 30%
- Verdant Mastery 20%
- Explosive Vegetation 19%
- Spring // Mind 14%
- Boundless Realms 9%
- Traverse the Outlands 7%
- Grow from the Ashes 6%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Map the Frontier 4%
- Reach the Horizon 4%
- Peregrination 3%
- Reshape the Earth 3%
- Primal Growth 3%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
Other options: Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, They Went This Way, Celebrate the Harvest, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, Harvest Season
Cards like Apex Devastator
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Skyshroud Claim
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Skyshroud Claim 44%
- Nature's Lore 32%
- Three Visits 26%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 17%
- Ranger's Path 10%
- Hunting Wilds 4%
- Glimpse the Core 3%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Harrow
3.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Temporal Trespass
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 29%
- Mana Reflection 22%
Cards like Sublime Epiphany
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir
Cards like Thunderous Snapper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Dawnglade Regent
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dawnglade Regent 23%
- Regal Behemoth 10%
Cards like Nulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nulldrifter 44%
- Wretched Gryff 9%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 16%
- Lightning Greaves 15%
Cards like Natural Reclamation
7.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Oxidize, Wilt, Stomp and Howl, Relic Crush, Naturalize, Wear Away, Break Asunder, Verdigris
All top picks (50)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.43 · 62.4% (73 of 117 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.53 · 38.5% (45 of 117 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.43 · 54.7% (64 of 117 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.49 · 40.2% (47 of 117 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.37 · 67.5% (79 of 117 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.55 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.55 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.42 · 52.1% (61 of 117 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.41 · 52.1% (61 of 117 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.53 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.52 · 28.2% (33 of 117 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (32 of 117 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.40 · 49.6% (58 of 117 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.49 · 29.1% (34 of 117 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.51 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.49 · 28.2% (33 of 117 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.49 · 29.1% (34 of 117 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.47 · 30.8% (36 of 117 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.44 · 36.8% (43 of 117 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.42 · 39.3% (46 of 117 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.40 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.49 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.43 · 33.3% (39 of 117 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.38 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.48 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.37 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.47 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.46 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.39 · 35.9% (42 of 117 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.45 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.40 · 31.6% (37 of 117 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.36 · 41.0% (48 of 117 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.39 · 32.5% (38 of 117 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.41 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.42 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.45 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.42 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (40 of 117 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.42 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.39 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.43 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.44 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.33 · 41.0% (48 of 117 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.35 · 34.2% (40 of 117 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.43 · 62.4% (73 of 117 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.53 · 38.5% (45 of 117 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.43 · 54.7% (64 of 117 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.49 · 40.2% (47 of 117 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.37 · 67.5% (79 of 117 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.55 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.55 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.53 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.52 · 28.2% (33 of 117 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (32 of 117 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.49 · 29.1% (34 of 117 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.51 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.49 · 28.2% (33 of 117 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.49 · 29.1% (34 of 117 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.47 · 30.8% (36 of 117 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.42 · 39.3% (46 of 117 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.49 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.38 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.48 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.37 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.47 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.39 · 35.9% (42 of 117 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.45 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.40 · 31.6% (37 of 117 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.36 · 41.0% (48 of 117 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.41 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.45 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.42 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (40 of 117 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.43 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.44 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.35 · 34.2% (40 of 117 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.34 · 37.6% (44 of 117 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.41 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.40 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.33 · 36.8% (43 of 117 decks)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.38 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Mockery of Nature relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.39 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Ghalta the Unstoppable relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.36 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.39 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Avatar of Growth relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.42 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.42 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.36 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.26 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Darksteel Monolith relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Honored Heirloom relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.16 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.16 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Staff of Nin relevance 0.27 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 0.24 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.23 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Ring of the Lucii relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 36.8% (43 of 117 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.21 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.20 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.40 · 49.6% (58 of 117 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.40 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.43 · 33.3% (39 of 117 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.39 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.33 · 41.0% (48 of 117 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (39 of 117 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.42 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.36 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.30 · 22.2% (26 of 117 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.21 · 45.3% (53 of 117 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Emrakul's Influence relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- From Beyond relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Cosmic Crucible relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Kiora Bests the Sea God relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Volition Reins relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Dream Halls relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Weirding Wood relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- In Bolas's Clutches relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.20 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.20 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.20 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.41 · 52.1% (61 of 117 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.41 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.37 · 27.4% (32 of 117 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.36 · 22.2% (26 of 117 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.36 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Rowdy Research relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.29 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Into the Story relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.22 · 32.5% (38 of 117 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.23 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Whirlwind Technique relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Spelljack relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.18 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Divide by Zero relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Become Immense relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Desecrate Reality relevance 0.25 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.25 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.10 · 33.3% (39 of 117 decks)
- School Daze relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Thranduil's Decree relevance 0.21 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Hunting Pack relevance 0.20 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.20 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Null Elemental Blast relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.42 · 52.1% (61 of 117 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.44 · 36.8% (43 of 117 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.46 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.39 · 32.5% (38 of 117 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.39 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.33 · 29.9% (35 of 117 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.39 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.37 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.38 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.33 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.39 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.24 · 43.6% (51 of 117 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.32 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.34 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.32 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.26 · 33.3% (39 of 117 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Growth Spasm relevance 0.37 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.32 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.30 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.32 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.30 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.30 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (78 of 117 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.31 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.29 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 72.6% (85 of 117 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.30 · 29.9% (35 of 117 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.39 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.24 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.32 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.39 · 29.1% (34 of 117 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.36 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.31 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.27 · 28.2% (33 of 117 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.22 · 35.0% (41 of 117 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.22 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.19 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.16 · 31.6% (37 of 117 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.16 · 22.2% (26 of 117 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.14 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 40.2% (47 of 117 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
All lands (50)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.22 · 24.8% (29 of 117 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.21 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.20 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.18 · 22.2% (26 of 117 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.17 · 24.8% (29 of 117 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.16 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.16 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.15 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 29.9% (35 of 117 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 53.8% (63 of 117 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.11 · 41.9% (49 of 117 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 41.9% (49 of 117 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.15 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 57.3% (67 of 117 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.15 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 40.2% (47 of 117 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.11 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.07 · 57.3% (67 of 117 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 45.3% (53 of 117 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty, from 117 real Commander decks.