Cards like Annoyed Altisaur
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Simic decks
77% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
3.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.3 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 63%
- Kodama's Reach 37%
- Rampant Growth 35%
- Search for Tomorrow 32%
- Spring // Mind 25%
- Verdant Mastery 25%
- Migration Path 23%
- Explosive Vegetation 18%
- Grow from the Ashes 9%
- Roamer's Routine 8%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Boundless Realms 6%
- Traverse the Outlands 3%
- Map the Frontier 3%
- Beneath the Sands 3%
- Nissa's Expedition 3%
- New Generation's Technique 3%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Primal Growth 2%
- Map the Wastes 2%
- Celebrate the Harvest 2%
- Reshape the Earth 2%
Other options: Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, They Went This Way, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival, Harvest Season
Cards like Harrow
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Elvish Aberration
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Koma, World-Eater
2.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
5.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nulldrifter 22%
- Wretched Gryff 18%
Cards like Thunderous Snapper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
8.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Primeval Herald, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger, Wild Wanderer
Cards like Dawnglade Regent
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dawnglade Regent 18%
- Regal Behemoth 11%
Cards like Dig Through Time
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Thundering Ceratok
Cards like River's Rebuke
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
9.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Natural Reclamation
7.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Natural Reclamation 23%
- Krosan Grip 5%
- Naturalize 5%
Other options: Oxidize, Wilt, Stomp and Howl, Relic Crush, Wear Away, Break Asunder, Verdigris
All top picks (50)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.48 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.46 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.44 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.47 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.35 · 66.2% (43 of 65 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.37 · 61.5% (40 of 65 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.44 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.46 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.39 · 50.8% (33 of 65 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.39 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.47 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.45 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.47 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.38 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.39 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.38 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.41 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.37 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.45 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 0.45 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.40 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.38 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Vexing Scuttler relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.40 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Lashweed Lurker relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.42 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.41 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.38 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.37 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.37 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.37 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.36 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.39 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Mockery of Nature relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.40 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.36 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.31 · 40.0% (26 of 65 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.33 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Tangle Golem relevance 0.42 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.38 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.33 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.36 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.36 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.48 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.46 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.44 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.47 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.35 · 66.2% (43 of 65 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.37 · 61.5% (40 of 65 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.44 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.46 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.39 · 50.8% (33 of 65 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.39 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.47 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.45 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.47 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.41 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.37 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.45 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 0.45 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.38 · 35.4% (23 of 65 decks)
- Vexing Scuttler relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.40 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Lashweed Lurker relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.42 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.41 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.38 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.37 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.37 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.36 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Mockery of Nature relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.40 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.36 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.31 · 40.0% (26 of 65 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.33 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Tangle Golem relevance 0.42 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.38 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.33 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.36 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.36 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Decimator of the Provinces relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.34 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.30 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Spire Golem relevance 0.41 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Walker of the Grove relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Drownyard Behemoth relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.37 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.27 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.26 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.21 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Ingenuity Engine relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Fractured Powerstone relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Meteor Sword relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Honored Heirloom relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Firemind Vessel relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.12 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.14 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Simic Cluestone relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Sylvok Battle-Chair relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Knowledge Pool relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Aladdin's Ring relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Aetherflux Conduit relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Necropouncer relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Runaway Boulder relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Chaos Wand relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Gift relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Altar of the Pantheon relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Pinnacle Kill-Ship relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.38 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.38 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.38 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.35 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.31 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.31 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.30 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.22 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.28 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.27 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Volition Reins relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Yavimaya's Embrace relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.26 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Lay Claim relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Verdant Haven relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Frontier Siege relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Eternity Snare relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Meat Locker // Drowned Diner relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Take Possession relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- In Bolas's Clutches relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Glittering Frost relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Cosmic Crucible relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Weirding Wood relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.12 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Emrakul's Influence relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Weftwalking relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
All instants (50)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.37 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.39 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Into the Story relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.28 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.24 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.22 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Hunting Pack relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Song of Inspiration relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Divide by Zero relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.24 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.24 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Thranduil's Decree relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Will of the Naga relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Sylvan Bounty relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Whirlwind Technique relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Scour the Laboratory relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Toils of Night and Day relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Prying Eyes relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Become Immense relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Rowdy Research relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.39 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.40 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 32.3% (21 of 65 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.32 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.36 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.30 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.35 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.30 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.28 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.30 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.30 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Spitting Image relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.28 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.27 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Metamorphosis relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Read the Tides relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.25 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.17 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.24 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 63.1% (41 of 65 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Self-Reflection relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.30 · 33.8% (22 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Genesis Mage relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.12 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.11 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.11 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.29 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.31 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.26 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.28 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.26 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.20 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (10 of 65 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.15 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Gods' Eye, Gate to the Reikai relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.09 · 21.5% (14 of 65 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All lands (50)
- Wastes relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.24 · 18.5% (12 of 65 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.17 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.17 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.16 · 26.2% (17 of 65 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.18 · 12.3% (8 of 65 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (9 of 65 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (5 of 65 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 27.7% (18 of 65 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (7 of 65 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (15 of 65 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (13 of 65 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 29.2% (19 of 65 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (4 of 65 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.09 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Pillar of the Paruns relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.08 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 38.5% (25 of 65 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.07 · 30.8% (20 of 65 decks)
- Grand Coliseum relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Unknown Shores relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Terminal Moraine relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Pym Technologies relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty, from 65 real Commander decks.