Ior Ruin Expedition
Played in 106 Ink-Treader decks
130+35+1+8+2+2+2+
Color Identity Spread
3.8% Ink-Treader
Commanders
Most Relevant
Khalni Heart Expedition 58.5% of decks
Khalni Heart Expedition 58.5% of decks
Seer's Sundial 34.9% of decks
Seer's Sundial 34.9% of decks
Rampaging Baloths 66.0% of decks
Rampaging Baloths 66.0% of decks
Felidar Retreat 67.9% of decks
Felidar Retreat 67.9% of decks
Druid Class 40.6% of decks
Druid Class 40.6% of decks
Lotus Cobra 69.8% of decks
Lotus Cobra 69.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.49 · 1.0% (95 of 9,292 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 2.18 · 58.5% (62 of 106 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 1.51 · 34.9% (37 of 106 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.46 · 66.0% (70 of 106 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.40 · 67.9% (72 of 106 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.37 · 40.6% (43 of 106 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.35 · 69.8% (74 of 106 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.34 · 55.7% (59 of 106 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.33 · 68.9% (73 of 106 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.31 · 64.2% (68 of 106 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.26 · 66.0% (70 of 106 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.25 · 62.3% (66 of 106 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.20 · 43.4% (46 of 106 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 1.19 · 37.7% (40 of 106 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.11 · 48.1% (51 of 106 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.11 · 29.2% (31 of 106 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.09 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.08 · 68.9% (73 of 106 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 1.08 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.07 · 45.3% (48 of 106 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 1.06 · 29.2% (31 of 106 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 1.05 · 31.1% (33 of 106 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.05 · 24.5% (26 of 106 decks)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 1.03 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.01 · 33.0% (35 of 106 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.99 · 31.1% (33 of 106 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.99 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Glyph Elemental relevance 0.96 · 17.9% (19 of 106 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.95 · 35.8% (38 of 106 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.92 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.90 · 34.9% (37 of 106 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.46 · 66.0% (70 of 106 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.35 · 69.8% (74 of 106 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.34 · 55.7% (59 of 106 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.33 · 68.9% (73 of 106 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.31 · 64.2% (68 of 106 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.26 · 66.0% (70 of 106 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.25 · 62.3% (66 of 106 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 1.19 · 37.7% (40 of 106 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.11 · 48.1% (51 of 106 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.11 · 29.2% (31 of 106 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.09 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.08 · 68.9% (73 of 106 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 1.08 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 1.06 · 29.2% (31 of 106 decks)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 1.03 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.01 · 33.0% (35 of 106 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.99 · 31.1% (33 of 106 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.99 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Glyph Elemental relevance 0.96 · 17.9% (19 of 106 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.95 · 35.8% (38 of 106 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.92 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.90 · 34.9% (37 of 106 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.90 · 39.6% (42 of 106 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.89 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.89 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.88 · 35.8% (38 of 106 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.88 · 37.7% (40 of 106 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 0.87 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.84 · 25.5% (27 of 106 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.84 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.82 · 23.6% (25 of 106 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.81 · 42.5% (45 of 106 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.81 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.76 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 0.76 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 1.51 · 34.9% (37 of 106 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 2.18 · 58.5% (62 of 106 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.40 · 67.9% (72 of 106 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.37 · 40.6% (43 of 106 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.20 · 43.4% (46 of 106 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.05 · 24.5% (26 of 106 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.85 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.82 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.81 · 29.2% (31 of 106 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 0.90 · 39.6% (42 of 106 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.82 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Explore relevance 1.07 · 45.3% (48 of 106 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 1.05 · 31.1% (33 of 106 decks)
All lands (2)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.79 · 36.8% (39 of 106 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.78 · 38.7% (41 of 106 decks)
EDH data for Ior Ruin Expedition: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 106 real decks.































