Color Identity Spread
4.4% Ink-Treader
330+27+1+5+5+2+2+8+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.41 · 2.0% (181 of 9,098 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist relevance 1.29 · 7.1% (14 of 198 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Barbara Wright relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 1.02 · 20.2% (59 of 292 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.96 · 61.3% (179 of 292 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.93 · 47.9% (140 of 292 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (120 of 292 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.89 · 36.3% (106 of 292 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.86 · 35.6% (104 of 292 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.82 · 42.8% (125 of 292 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.82 · 24.0% (70 of 292 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.80 · 39.4% (115 of 292 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.78 · 37.7% (110 of 292 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.78 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.76 · 27.7% (81 of 292 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.76 · 40.1% (117 of 292 decks)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 0.74 · 20.2% (59 of 292 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.72 · 36.3% (106 of 292 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.72 · 31.8% (93 of 292 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.72 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.70 · 20.5% (60 of 292 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.69 · 30.5% (89 of 292 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.67 · 17.1% (50 of 292 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.66 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 24.3% (71 of 292 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.64 · 32.2% (94 of 292 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.64 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.63 · 23.3% (68 of 292 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (40 of 292 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.61 · 29.8% (87 of 292 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.61 · 26.0% (76 of 292 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.61 · 36.0% (105 of 292 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.60 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 1.02 · 20.2% (59 of 292 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.96 · 61.3% (179 of 292 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.93 · 47.9% (140 of 292 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (120 of 292 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.89 · 36.3% (106 of 292 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.86 · 35.6% (104 of 292 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.82 · 42.8% (125 of 292 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.80 · 39.4% (115 of 292 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.78 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.76 · 40.1% (117 of 292 decks)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 0.74 · 20.2% (59 of 292 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.72 · 36.3% (106 of 292 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.70 · 20.5% (60 of 292 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.69 · 30.5% (89 of 292 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.67 · 17.1% (50 of 292 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.66 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.64 · 32.2% (94 of 292 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.64 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.63 · 23.3% (68 of 292 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (40 of 292 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.61 · 29.8% (87 of 292 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.61 · 36.0% (105 of 292 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.59 · 24.0% (70 of 292 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.58 · 20.9% (61 of 292 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.57 · 21.9% (64 of 292 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.55 · 23.6% (69 of 292 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (44 of 292 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 24.3% (71 of 292 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.78 · 37.7% (110 of 292 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.76 · 27.7% (81 of 292 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.60 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.57 · 20.5% (60 of 292 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.51 · 25.0% (73 of 292 decks)
All instants (5)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.82 · 24.0% (70 of 292 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.72 · 31.8% (93 of 292 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.57 · 19.9% (58 of 292 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.55 · 40.1% (117 of 292 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.53 · 29.8% (87 of 292 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.72 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.61 · 26.0% (76 of 292 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.58 · 19.5% (57 of 292 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (38 of 292 decks)
All lands (8)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.73 · 33.2% (97 of 292 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.72 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.70 · 26.4% (77 of 292 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.68 · 33.9% (99 of 292 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.60 · 25.3% (74 of 292 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (73 of 292 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.53 · 40.8% (119 of 292 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.50 · 33.2% (97 of 292 decks)
EDH data for Gretchen Titchwillow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 292 real decks.
















































