Color Identity Spread
5.6% Bant
Commanders
7
Commanders
7Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All commanders (7)
- Amareth, the Lustrous relevance 2.05 · 3.2% (26 of 802 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 1.94 · 1.3% (65 of 4,875 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.49 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Prava of the Steel Legion // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.49 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Captain Kirk, Boldly Going relevance 0.31 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 0.30 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 1.14 · 16.9% (39 of 231 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.13 · 41.1% (95 of 231 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.97 · 15.6% (36 of 231 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.94 · 22.5% (52 of 231 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 25.1% (58 of 231 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.91 · 25.5% (59 of 231 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.91 · 31.6% (73 of 231 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.89 · 23.8% (55 of 231 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (40 of 231 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (47 of 231 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.86 · 28.1% (65 of 231 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.85 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.82 · 12.1% (28 of 231 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.82 · 22.1% (51 of 231 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (33 of 231 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.79 · 16.0% (37 of 231 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.74 · 34.2% (79 of 231 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.66 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.65 · 13.9% (32 of 231 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (26 of 231 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.63 · 20.8% (48 of 231 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.63 · 13.4% (31 of 231 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.61 · 14.7% (34 of 231 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.59 · 9.1% (21 of 231 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.58 · 10.4% (24 of 231 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (26 of 231 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.55 · 14.3% (33 of 231 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.54 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
Creatures
27
Creatures
27 Showing 1-10 of 27
Page size
All creatures (27)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 1.14 · 16.9% (39 of 231 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.13 · 41.1% (95 of 231 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.97 · 15.6% (36 of 231 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.94 · 22.5% (52 of 231 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 25.1% (58 of 231 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.91 · 25.5% (59 of 231 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.89 · 23.8% (55 of 231 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (40 of 231 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.86 · 28.1% (65 of 231 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.85 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.82 · 12.1% (28 of 231 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.82 · 22.1% (51 of 231 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (33 of 231 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.66 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.65 · 13.9% (32 of 231 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (26 of 231 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.63 · 20.8% (48 of 231 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.63 · 13.4% (31 of 231 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.61 · 14.7% (34 of 231 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.58 · 10.4% (24 of 231 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (26 of 231 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.53 · 14.7% (34 of 231 decks)
- Tameshi, Reality Architect relevance 0.51 · 7.8% (18 of 231 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (44 of 231 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (36 of 231 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.46 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
Enchantments
7
Enchantments
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All enchantments (7)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.91 · 31.6% (73 of 231 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (47 of 231 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.79 · 16.0% (37 of 231 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.59 · 9.1% (21 of 231 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.47 · 14.3% (33 of 231 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
Instants
2
Instants
2 All instants (2)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.74 · 34.2% (79 of 231 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.55 · 14.3% (33 of 231 decks)
Sorceries
2
Sorceries
2 
All sorceries (2)
- Explore relevance 0.54 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.49 · 24.7% (57 of 231 decks)
Utility Lands
2
Utility Lands
2 
All utility lands (2)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.54 · 24.2% (56 of 231 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.46 · 14.7% (34 of 231 decks)
Lands
10
Lands
10 Showing 1-10 of 10
Page size
All lands (10)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.82 · 35.5% (82 of 231 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.81 · 35.5% (82 of 231 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.80 · 36.4% (84 of 231 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.71 · 37.2% (86 of 231 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.68 · 22.9% (53 of 231 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.63 · 45.0% (104 of 231 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (40 of 231 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (37 of 231 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.48 · 15.2% (35 of 231 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (19 of 231 decks)
EDH data for Murasa Rootgrazer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 231 real decks.