Back to Nature
Played in 301 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
230+7+4+2+13+15+5+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Darigaaz Reincarnated relevance 1.00 · 3.0% (5 of 168 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.34 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.68 · 25.2% (76 of 301 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.35 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.33 · 17.9% (54 of 301 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.32 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.31 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.30 · 15.9% (48 of 301 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.29 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.29 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.28 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.28 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.27 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.27 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.31 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.28 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.28 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.27 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.25 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.30 · 15.9% (48 of 301 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.25 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
All instants (13)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.32 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.27 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.26 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.24 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.24 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.68 · 25.2% (76 of 301 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.35 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.33 · 17.9% (54 of 301 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.29 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.29 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Brotherhood's End relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Hull Breach relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.31 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Twisted Landscape relevance 0.31 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.30 · 14.6% (44 of 301 decks)
- Raucous Theater relevance 0.26 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.24 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
All lands (4)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
EDH data for Back to Nature: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 301 real decks.





















































