Back to Nature
Played in 265 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
430+3+6+1+20+7+3+10+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fugitive Doctor relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.35 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.34 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.31 · 1.4% (1 of 70 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.73 · 26.8% (71 of 265 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.39 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.39 · 14.0% (37 of 265 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.38 · 30.9% (82 of 265 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.38 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.37 · 23.0% (61 of 265 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.37 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.36 · 8.7% (23 of 265 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.35 · 12.1% (32 of 265 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.35 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.34 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.34 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.33 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.33 · 20.4% (54 of 265 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (43 of 265 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (20 of 265 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.30 · 14.0% (37 of 265 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (38 of 265 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.29 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (34 of 265 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.29 · 11.7% (31 of 265 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (23 of 265 decks)
- Ancient Grudge relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.36 · 8.7% (23 of 265 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (34 of 265 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.27 · 12.1% (32 of 265 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.39 · 14.0% (37 of 265 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.34 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (43 of 265 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.27 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Exploration relevance 0.29 · 11.7% (31 of 265 decks)
All instants (20)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.38 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.37 · 23.0% (61 of 265 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.37 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.35 · 12.1% (32 of 265 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.35 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.33 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.33 · 20.4% (54 of 265 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (20 of 265 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.30 · 14.0% (37 of 265 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (38 of 265 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.29 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Ancient Grudge relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.28 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (25 of 265 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.27 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.27 · 12.1% (32 of 265 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.73 · 26.8% (71 of 265 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.39 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.38 · 30.9% (82 of 265 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.34 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (23 of 265 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.38 · 27.9% (74 of 265 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.36 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (38 of 265 decks)
All lands (10)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 26.8% (71 of 265 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.36 · 17.0% (45 of 265 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.36 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.36 · 17.7% (47 of 265 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.30 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (30 of 265 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.28 · 14.0% (37 of 265 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.28 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (25 of 265 decks)
EDH data for Back to Nature: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 265 real decks.
























































