Back to Nature
Played in 170 Abzan decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (6)
- Ravos, Soultender // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.20 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.76 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Hamza, Might of the Yathan relevance 0.55 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.46 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.37 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.35 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Austere Command relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.46 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.44 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Colfenor, the Last Yew relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Black Poplar Shaman relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (18 of 170 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.39 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Sapling of Colfenor relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Treebeard, Gracious Host relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (35 of 170 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.37 · 24.7% (42 of 170 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.36 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.36 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 0.35 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Kambal, Consul of Allocation relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.32 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.32 · 10.6% (18 of 170 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.44 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Colfenor, the Last Yew relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Black Poplar Shaman relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (18 of 170 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Sapling of Colfenor relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Treebeard, Gracious Host relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (35 of 170 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.36 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.36 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 0.35 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Kambal, Consul of Allocation relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 0.31 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 0.31 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.32 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.31 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.31 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.31 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
All instants (5)
- Putrefy relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.31 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.31 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Austere Command relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.46 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.39 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.37 · 24.7% (42 of 170 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.32 · 10.6% (18 of 170 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.37 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.35 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
All lands (6)
- Murmuring Bosk relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.33 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Haunted Mire relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.31 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.30 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
EDH data for Back to Nature: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 170 real decks.