Primeval Titan
Played in 53 Abzan decks
3
All commanders (3)
- Hamza, Might of the Yathan relevance 1.23 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.59 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.54 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
30
All most relevant (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.41 · 52.8% (28 of 53 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.41 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.39 · 50.9% (27 of 53 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.18 · 39.6% (21 of 53 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.07 · 37.7% (20 of 53 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.06 · 34.0% (18 of 53 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.06 · 43.4% (23 of 53 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.97 · 39.6% (21 of 53 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.97 · 34.0% (18 of 53 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.95 · 35.8% (19 of 53 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.94 · 39.6% (21 of 53 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.91 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.90 · 28.3% (15 of 53 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 28.3% (15 of 53 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.88 · 37.7% (20 of 53 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.85 · 18.9% (10 of 53 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.84 · 32.1% (17 of 53 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.83 · 30.2% (16 of 53 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.83 · 49.1% (26 of 53 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 0.83 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.83 · 22.6% (12 of 53 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.82 · 24.5% (13 of 53 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.80 · 34.0% (18 of 53 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.79 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.77 · 28.3% (15 of 53 decks)
- Wight of the Reliquary relevance 0.77 · 32.1% (17 of 53 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 0.77 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
26
All creatures (26)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.41 · 52.8% (28 of 53 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.41 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.39 · 50.9% (27 of 53 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.18 · 39.6% (21 of 53 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.06 · 34.0% (18 of 53 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.06 · 43.4% (23 of 53 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.95 · 35.8% (19 of 53 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.94 · 39.6% (21 of 53 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.90 · 28.3% (15 of 53 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.88 · 37.7% (20 of 53 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.85 · 18.9% (10 of 53 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.84 · 32.1% (17 of 53 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.83 · 49.1% (26 of 53 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 0.83 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.83 · 22.6% (12 of 53 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.77 · 28.3% (15 of 53 decks)
- Wight of the Reliquary relevance 0.77 · 32.1% (17 of 53 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 0.77 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.77 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.76 · 22.6% (12 of 53 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.75 · 22.6% (12 of 53 decks)
- Six relevance 0.72 · 32.1% (17 of 53 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.69 · 18.9% (10 of 53 decks)
2
All artifacts (2)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.07 · 37.7% (20 of 53 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 28.3% (15 of 53 decks)
4
All enchantments (4)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.97 · 39.6% (21 of 53 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.83 · 30.2% (16 of 53 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.79 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 22.6% (12 of 53 decks)
4
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.97 · 34.0% (18 of 53 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.80 · 34.0% (18 of 53 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.76 · 24.5% (13 of 53 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.75 · 24.5% (13 of 53 decks)
4
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.91 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.82 · 24.5% (13 of 53 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.77 · 18.9% (10 of 53 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.77 · 17.0% (9 of 53 decks)
2
All utility lands (2)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.97 · 28.3% (15 of 53 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.66 · 20.8% (11 of 53 decks)
8
All lands (8)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.82 · 18.9% (10 of 53 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.73 · 24.5% (13 of 53 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.71 · 22.6% (12 of 53 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (10 of 53 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.69 · 15.1% (8 of 53 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.69 · 26.4% (14 of 53 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.67 · 22.6% (12 of 53 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.67 · 24.5% (13 of 53 decks)
EDH data for Primeval Titan: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 53 real decks.






































