Elvish Reclaimer
Played in 4,004 Naya decks
1325+13+1+3+3+5+19+6+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 42.9% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 42.9% of decks
Yuma, Proud Protector 23.6% of decks
Yuma, Proud Protector 23.6% of decks
Toph, the First Metalbender 2.8% of decks
Toph, the First Metalbender 2.8% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 4.5% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 4.5% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 5.4% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 5.4% of decks
Zacama, Primal Calamity 1.9% of decks
Zacama, Primal Calamity 1.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Dune Chanter 68.8% of decks
Dune Chanter 68.8% of decks
Desert Warfare 57.3% of decks
Desert Warfare 57.3% of decks
Nahiri's Lithoforming 49.2% of decks
Nahiri's Lithoforming 49.2% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 59.4% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 59.4% of decks
Sand Scout 50.5% of decks
Sand Scout 50.5% of decks
Sylvan Safekeeper 63.2% of decks
Sylvan Safekeeper 63.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (13)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.72 · 42.9% (1,883 of 4,385 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.52 · 23.6% (882 of 3,735 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 1.27 · 2.8% (774 of 27,246 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.10 · 4.5% (82 of 1,839 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.84 · 5.4% (20 of 373 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.58 · 1.9% (50 of 2,587 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 0.56 · 2.2% (31 of 1,417 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 0.46 · 1.3% (70 of 5,592 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.43 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.30 · 1.7% (8 of 476 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.07 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.07 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
All most relevant (25)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.22 · 68.8% (2,754 of 4,004 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.14 · 57.3% (2,295 of 4,004 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.93 · 49.2% (1,971 of 4,004 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.90 · 59.4% (2,377 of 4,004 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.88 · 50.5% (2,024 of 4,004 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.84 · 63.2% (2,530 of 4,004 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.79 · 68.5% (2,743 of 4,004 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.78 · 50.6% (2,028 of 4,004 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.74 · 38.6% (1,545 of 4,004 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.69 · 44.9% (1,797 of 4,004 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.69 · 43.9% (1,759 of 4,004 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.68 · 50.4% (2,020 of 4,004 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.68 · 67.7% (2,709 of 4,004 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.67 · 51.4% (2,057 of 4,004 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.67 · 61.4% (2,457 of 4,004 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.60 · 48.5% (1,943 of 4,004 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.52 · 42.7% (1,708 of 4,004 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.47 · 37.0% (1,480 of 4,004 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 56.5% (2,261 of 4,004 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.45 · 46.1% (1,844 of 4,004 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.42 · 42.9% (1,719 of 4,004 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.40 · 38.8% (1,552 of 4,004 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.32 · 31.4% (1,258 of 4,004 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.24 · 29.1% (1,167 of 4,004 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 50.6% (2,027 of 4,004 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.22 · 68.8% (2,754 of 4,004 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.90 · 59.4% (2,377 of 4,004 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.88 · 50.5% (2,024 of 4,004 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.84 · 63.2% (2,530 of 4,004 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.68 · 50.4% (2,020 of 4,004 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.67 · 51.4% (2,057 of 4,004 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.67 · 61.4% (2,457 of 4,004 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.60 · 48.5% (1,943 of 4,004 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.52 · 42.7% (1,708 of 4,004 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 56.5% (2,261 of 4,004 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.40 · 38.8% (1,552 of 4,004 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.24 · 29.1% (1,167 of 4,004 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 50.6% (2,027 of 4,004 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.79 · 68.5% (2,743 of 4,004 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.14 · 57.3% (2,295 of 4,004 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.45 · 46.1% (1,844 of 4,004 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.42 · 42.9% (1,719 of 4,004 decks)
All instants (3)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.74 · 38.6% (1,545 of 4,004 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.68 · 67.7% (2,709 of 4,004 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.32 · 31.4% (1,258 of 4,004 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.93 · 49.2% (1,971 of 4,004 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.78 · 50.6% (2,028 of 4,004 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.69 · 44.9% (1,797 of 4,004 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.69 · 43.9% (1,759 of 4,004 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.47 · 37.0% (1,480 of 4,004 decks)
All utility lands (19)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 2.28 · 66.5% (2,664 of 4,004 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 2.26 · 66.6% (2,666 of 4,004 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 2.26 · 65.9% (2,639 of 4,004 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 2.23 · 66.1% (2,647 of 4,004 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 2.22 · 65.2% (2,612 of 4,004 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 2.21 · 65.3% (2,614 of 4,004 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 2.21 · 63.3% (2,535 of 4,004 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 2.05 · 58.7% (2,351 of 4,004 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 2.01 · 58.0% (2,322 of 4,004 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.92 · 52.3% (2,096 of 4,004 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 1.75 · 42.2% (1,689 of 4,004 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.69 · 46.7% (1,869 of 4,004 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 1.65 · 41.0% (1,640 of 4,004 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.55 · 39.2% (1,571 of 4,004 decks)
- Cradle of the Accursed relevance 1.52 · 35.5% (1,422 of 4,004 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 1.50 · 36.3% (1,453 of 4,004 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.37 · 41.5% (1,660 of 4,004 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.34 · 32.3% (1,295 of 4,004 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.30 · 58.3% (2,336 of 4,004 decks)
All lands (6)
- Creosote Heath relevance 2.04 · 64.4% (2,580 of 4,004 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 2.04 · 64.4% (2,580 of 4,004 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 2.01 · 63.3% (2,536 of 4,004 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 2.01 · 52.7% (2,109 of 4,004 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.86 · 53.0% (2,123 of 4,004 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.79 · 48.6% (1,945 of 4,004 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Reclaimer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,004 real decks.























































