Time Stretch
Played in 5,406 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
19.1% Blue
All commanders (30)
- Yue, the Moon Spirit relevance 3.11 · 45.1% (416 of 922 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 3.09 · 24.5% (1,873 of 7,644 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 2.75 · 40.1% (262 of 653 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 2.71 · 38.3% (266 of 695 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias // The Great Synthesis relevance 2.42 · 22.4% (467 of 2,089 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 1.89 · 18.6% (176 of 945 decks)
- Kang the Conqueror relevance 1.66 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 1.36 · 17.5% (46 of 263 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 1.17 · 10.9% (63 of 577 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 1.17 · 9.8% (79 of 803 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 1.12 · 9.4% (72 of 762 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.05 · 13.7% (27 of 197 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.05 · 13.6% (27 of 198 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.94 · 7.1% (67 of 949 decks)
- Vision, Spectral Synthezoid relevance 0.83 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.74 · 7.4% (25 of 339 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.74 · 6.1% (37 of 607 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.70 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.68 · 5.5% (35 of 641 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.57 · 5.5% (19 of 344 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.54 · 2.1% (255 of 11,886 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.49 · 6.2% (10 of 162 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (7 of 94 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.46 · 5.6% (10 of 179 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (24 of 716 decks)
- Ironheart, Clever Champion relevance 0.44 · 3.8% (18 of 478 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.43 · 5.8% (8 of 138 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.37 · 1.9% (61 of 3,167 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (18 of 607 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Expropriate relevance 1.20 · 34.1% (1,841 of 5,406 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.20 · 39.3% (2,123 of 5,406 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.16 · 38.4% (2,077 of 5,406 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.00 · 29.4% (1,589 of 5,406 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.93 · 29.2% (1,581 of 5,406 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.91 · 22.6% (1,222 of 5,406 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.90 · 35.3% (1,911 of 5,406 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.90 · 24.0% (1,300 of 5,406 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.82 · 18.7% (1,010 of 5,406 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.80 · 28.5% (1,539 of 5,406 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.77 · 27.9% (1,508 of 5,406 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.74 · 18.9% (1,022 of 5,406 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.73 · 33.3% (1,798 of 5,406 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.71 · 24.7% (1,335 of 5,406 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.70 · 29.4% (1,590 of 5,406 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.69 · 16.6% (898 of 5,406 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.69 · 40.6% (2,196 of 5,406 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 45.2% (2,442 of 5,406 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.67 · 30.3% (1,639 of 5,406 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (878 of 5,406 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.67 · 36.3% (1,962 of 5,406 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (916 of 5,406 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.66 · 27.2% (1,471 of 5,406 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.66 · 23.0% (1,245 of 5,406 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (876 of 5,406 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 0.64 · 16.5% (893 of 5,406 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.63 · 24.3% (1,314 of 5,406 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.62 · 26.8% (1,451 of 5,406 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.61 · 25.1% (1,359 of 5,406 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (1,079 of 5,406 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.69 · 40.6% (2,196 of 5,406 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 45.2% (2,442 of 5,406 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.66 · 23.0% (1,245 of 5,406 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 0.64 · 16.5% (893 of 5,406 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.62 · 26.8% (1,451 of 5,406 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.61 · 25.1% (1,359 of 5,406 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.60 · 25.2% (1,363 of 5,406 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.59 · 18.1% (981 of 5,406 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.59 · 27.1% (1,467 of 5,406 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.59 · 28.4% (1,534 of 5,406 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.52 · 21.8% (1,178 of 5,406 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Omniscience relevance 0.90 · 35.3% (1,911 of 5,406 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.77 · 27.9% (1,508 of 5,406 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (916 of 5,406 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.50 · 39.8% (2,153 of 5,406 decks)
All instants (17)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.20 · 39.3% (2,123 of 5,406 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.73 · 33.3% (1,798 of 5,406 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.71 · 24.7% (1,335 of 5,406 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.70 · 29.4% (1,590 of 5,406 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.67 · 30.3% (1,639 of 5,406 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.67 · 36.3% (1,962 of 5,406 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.66 · 27.2% (1,471 of 5,406 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.63 · 24.3% (1,314 of 5,406 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (1,079 of 5,406 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.59 · 35.7% (1,928 of 5,406 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.58 · 23.7% (1,283 of 5,406 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.58 · 27.5% (1,484 of 5,406 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.57 · 26.8% (1,450 of 5,406 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.55 · 43.8% (2,369 of 5,406 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.53 · 20.4% (1,104 of 5,406 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.52 · 36.3% (1,964 of 5,406 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.50 · 23.0% (1,246 of 5,406 decks)
All sorceries (17)
- Expropriate relevance 1.20 · 34.1% (1,841 of 5,406 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.16 · 38.4% (2,077 of 5,406 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.00 · 29.4% (1,589 of 5,406 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.93 · 29.2% (1,581 of 5,406 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.91 · 22.6% (1,222 of 5,406 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.90 · 24.0% (1,300 of 5,406 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.82 · 18.7% (1,010 of 5,406 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.80 · 28.5% (1,539 of 5,406 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.74 · 18.9% (1,022 of 5,406 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.69 · 16.6% (898 of 5,406 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (878 of 5,406 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (876 of 5,406 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.59 · 16.8% (909 of 5,406 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (1,351 of 5,406 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (691 of 5,406 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.50 · 20.0% (1,083 of 5,406 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.49 · 11.1% (599 of 5,406 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.57 · 29.6% (1,601 of 5,406 decks)
EDH data for Time Stretch: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,406 real decks.