Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50All top picks (50)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.80 · 75.3% (119 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Retainer relevance 0.87 · 64.6% (102 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.74 · 74.1% (117 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.82 · 62.7% (99 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 0.86 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 0.84 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 0.83 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.67 · 75.9% (120 of 158 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.69 · 71.5% (113 of 158 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.73 · 65.8% (104 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.75 · 58.9% (93 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.63 · 74.7% (118 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 0.83 · 39.9% (63 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 0.84 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Vandal relevance 0.78 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.55 · 75.9% (120 of 158 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.59 · 60.8% (96 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.59 · 58.2% (92 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.65 · 47.5% (75 of 158 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.68 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.65 · 46.8% (74 of 158 decks)
- Psychic Pickpocket relevance 0.75 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.63 · 39.9% (63 of 158 decks)
- Backstreet Bruiser relevance 0.73 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.57 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.54 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.59 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.56 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.56 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 34.8% (55 of 158 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.56 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.57 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.58 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.55 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.52 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.40 · 51.3% (81 of 158 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.38 · 57.6% (91 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.39 · 53.2% (84 of 158 decks)
- Deluge relevance 0.52 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.51 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.41 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Riptide Replicator relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Think Tank relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.45 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.49 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.50 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.47 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.35 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
Card Stacks
11
Card Stacks
11
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 All creatures (50)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.80 · 75.3% (119 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Retainer relevance 0.87 · 64.6% (102 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.74 · 74.1% (117 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.82 · 62.7% (99 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 0.86 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 0.84 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 0.83 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.67 · 75.9% (120 of 158 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.69 · 71.5% (113 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.75 · 58.9% (93 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.63 · 74.7% (118 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 0.83 · 39.9% (63 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 0.84 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Vandal relevance 0.78 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.59 · 58.2% (92 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.65 · 47.5% (75 of 158 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.65 · 46.8% (74 of 158 decks)
- Psychic Pickpocket relevance 0.75 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Backstreet Bruiser relevance 0.73 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.54 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.56 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 34.8% (55 of 158 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.56 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.57 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.58 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.55 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.52 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.40 · 51.3% (81 of 158 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.38 · 57.6% (91 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.39 · 53.2% (84 of 158 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.51 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.49 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.47 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Giant Octopus relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.48 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.39 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.38 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.37 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.35 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.33 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Illithid Harvester // Plant Tadpoles relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.35 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.29 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Godhunter Octopus relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 All artifacts (50)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.59 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Riptide Replicator relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.35 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Storage Matrix relevance 0.40 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Birthing Boughs relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.38 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Shuko relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.35 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Charmed Pendant relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.27 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Mirror of Fate relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.31 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.23 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.25 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.19 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Doom Cannon relevance 0.38 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.20 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Eye of Ramos relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.17 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Mirari relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Icy Manipulator relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Progenitor's Icon relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.15 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Mindlink Mech relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 All enchantments (50)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.55 · 75.9% (120 of 158 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.68 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.63 · 39.9% (63 of 158 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.57 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.56 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Think Tank relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.50 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Immobilizing Ink relevance 0.54 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.43 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.41 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Flood relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Stupefying Touch relevance 0.49 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.36 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Mystic Decree relevance 0.48 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Persuasion relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Time of Ice relevance 0.40 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.38 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Faces of the Past relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Xenograft relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Dragon Wings relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Shrine relevance 0.41 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Pedantic Learning relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.24 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.31 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.24 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.21 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Alexi's Cloak relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Gravitational Shift relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 All instants (50)
- Deluge relevance 0.52 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.40 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.35 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.23 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Ensnare relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.18 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Cunning Wish relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.19 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.23 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Siren's Call relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Psychic Trance relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.11 · 62.7% (99 of 158 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.18 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Scent of Brine relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.16 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.13 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.14 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.15 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 36.1% (57 of 158 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.12 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.15 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.11 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Reality Ripple relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.13 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.13 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.11 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Read the Runes relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 All sorceries (50)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.73 · 65.8% (104 of 158 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.59 · 60.8% (96 of 158 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.41 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Churning Eddy relevance 0.51 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.33 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Touch of Invisibility relevance 0.45 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Sleep relevance 0.35 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.23 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Mana Vapors relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Quiet Speculation relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.20 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Misstep relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.18 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.19 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.13 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.13 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
Planeswalkers
3
Planeswalkers
3 All planeswalkers (3)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.45 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.15 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
Utility Lands
45
Utility Lands
45 All utility lands (45)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.35 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.27 · 43.7% (69 of 158 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.32 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.22 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.19 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.21 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.18 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Tolaria relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.13 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 48.7% (77 of 158 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 51.3% (81 of 158 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
Lands
18
Lands
18 All lands (18)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.30 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.25 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.20 · 29.7% (47 of 158 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 87.3% (138 of 158 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor, from 158 real Commander decks.





























































































































































































































































































































