Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.59 · 62.9% (1,280 of 2,035 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.69 · 45.4% (924 of 2,035 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.61 · 53.8% (1,094 of 2,035 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.67 · 43.7% (889 of 2,035 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.57 · 53.7% (1,093 of 2,035 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.71 · 31.4% (640 of 2,035 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.54 · 59.0% (1,200 of 2,035 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.64 · 42.4% (862 of 2,035 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.74 · 26.7% (544 of 2,035 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.63 · 39.3% (799 of 2,035 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.56 · 49.6% (1,009 of 2,035 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.66 · 30.7% (624 of 2,035 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.59 · 39.8% (810 of 2,035 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (864 of 2,035 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (865 of 2,035 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.60 · 37.6% (765 of 2,035 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.68 · 25.1% (510 of 2,035 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.64 · 31.0% (630 of 2,035 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.58 · 36.5% (743 of 2,035 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.67 · 21.9% (445 of 2,035 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.47 · 49.3% (1,004 of 2,035 decks)
- Trawler Drake relevance 0.76 · 8.7% (177 of 2,035 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.67 · 14.2% (289 of 2,035 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.57 · 28.3% (575 of 2,035 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.75 · 8.2% (167 of 2,035 decks)
- Serum Sovereign relevance 0.70 · 10.7% (218 of 2,035 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.57 · 22.6% (460 of 2,035 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (277 of 2,035 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.69 · 9.0% (184 of 2,035 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.58 · 16.0% (325 of 2,035 decks)
- Eyes of Gitaxias relevance 0.83 · 4.2% (86 of 2,035 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.37 · 55.0% (1,119 of 2,035 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.35 · 61.3% (1,247 of 2,035 decks)
- Defiler of Dreams relevance 0.48 · 29.8% (607 of 2,035 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.65 · 8.0% (162 of 2,035 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (245 of 2,035 decks)
- Malcator's Watcher relevance 0.68 · 5.5% (111 of 2,035 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.54 · 14.7% (300 of 2,035 decks)
- Meldweb Curator relevance 0.73 · 4.5% (91 of 2,035 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.61 · 9.1% (185 of 2,035 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.50 · 19.9% (405 of 2,035 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.49 · 19.2% (390 of 2,035 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (272 of 2,035 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (192 of 2,035 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.42 · 33.0% (672 of 2,035 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.53 · 13.1% (266 of 2,035 decks)
- Distorted Curiosity relevance 0.66 · 4.7% (95 of 2,035 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.34 · 52.9% (1,076 of 2,035 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.46 · 20.9% (426 of 2,035 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.47 · 17.4% (354 of 2,035 decks)
Card Stacks
27
Card Stacks
27Showing 1-2 of 27
Cards like Contentious Plan
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards like Flux Channeler
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 50%
- Dreamtide Whale 28%
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Unwind
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Time Stretch
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Reject Imperfection
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Convolute, Out of Bounds, Mindstatic, Thoughtbind, Frazzle
Cards like Solve the Equation
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Mercurial Spelldancer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Vivisurgeon's Insight
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Tidings, Brilliant Plan, Unexplained Vision, Universal Surveillance, Eagle Vision, Shared Discovery
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 42%
- Mystic Remora 37%
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 66%
- Commander's Sphere 18%
Cards like Consecrated Sphinx
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Experimental Augury
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards like Brainstorm
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 42%
- Brainsurge 23%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ring of the Lucii, Ur-Golem's Eye, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Negation
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 24%
- Force of Will 21%
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thirst for Discovery
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Thirst for Identity
Cards like Aetherize
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aetherize 39%
- Evacuation 11%
- Perplexing Test 2%
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Academy Wall, Muse Seeker, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Cryptic Command
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gilded Lotus
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards like Quick Study
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Counsel of the Soratami, Hieroglyphic Illumination, Catalog, Inspiration, Weave Fate, Touch of Brilliance
Cards like Disallow
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
- Disallow 21%
- Cancel 4%
- Saw It Coming 3%
- Ertai's Scorn 2%
- Sinister Sabotage 1%
Other options: Twist Reality, Admiral's Order, Scatter to the Winds, Forceful Denial, Broken Concentration, Wizard's Retort, Confirm Suspicions, Fervent Denial
Cards like Bender's Waterskin
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Chromatic Lantern, Honor-Worn Shaku, Patriar's Seal, Spectral Searchlight
Cards like Archmage's Charm
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Soul Read, Artistic Refusal
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.61 · 53.8% (1,094 of 2,035 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.67 · 43.7% (889 of 2,035 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.54 · 59.0% (1,200 of 2,035 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.56 · 49.6% (1,009 of 2,035 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (865 of 2,035 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.60 · 37.6% (765 of 2,035 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.67 · 21.9% (445 of 2,035 decks)
- Trawler Drake relevance 0.76 · 8.7% (177 of 2,035 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.57 · 28.3% (575 of 2,035 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.75 · 8.2% (167 of 2,035 decks)
- Serum Sovereign relevance 0.70 · 10.7% (218 of 2,035 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.35 · 61.3% (1,247 of 2,035 decks)
- Defiler of Dreams relevance 0.48 · 29.8% (607 of 2,035 decks)
- Malcator's Watcher relevance 0.68 · 5.5% (111 of 2,035 decks)
- Meldweb Curator relevance 0.73 · 4.5% (91 of 2,035 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.61 · 9.1% (185 of 2,035 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (192 of 2,035 decks)
- Atmosphere Surgeon relevance 0.74 · 3.5% (72 of 2,035 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.30 · 54.9% (1,117 of 2,035 decks)
- Myr Convert relevance 0.55 · 6.8% (139 of 2,035 decks)
- Plague Myr relevance 0.55 · 6.8% (138 of 2,035 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.39 · 25.4% (516 of 2,035 decks)
- Ichor Synthesizer relevance 0.73 · 3.1% (64 of 2,035 decks)
- Glistener Seer relevance 0.71 · 3.3% (68 of 2,035 decks)
- Watchful Blisterzoa relevance 0.74 · 2.9% (58 of 2,035 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.37 · 24.8% (504 of 2,035 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (280 of 2,035 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (161 of 2,035 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.36 · 25.2% (512 of 2,035 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (97 of 2,035 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.38 · 19.5% (396 of 2,035 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.37 · 22.7% (462 of 2,035 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.41 · 13.5% (274 of 2,035 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (202 of 2,035 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (230 of 2,035 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.47 · 5.4% (109 of 2,035 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.30 · 36.6% (744 of 2,035 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.51 · 4.4% (89 of 2,035 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.43 · 7.9% (160 of 2,035 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.35 · 15.2% (309 of 2,035 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (219 of 2,035 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.28 · 33.4% (680 of 2,035 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.51 · 3.8% (78 of 2,035 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.32 · 18.4% (374 of 2,035 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (130 of 2,035 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.26 · 37.3% (759 of 2,035 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.47 · 4.1% (84 of 2,035 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.30 · 22.9% (467 of 2,035 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.32 · 15.4% (313 of 2,035 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.37 · 7.8% (159 of 2,035 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.71 · 31.4% (640 of 2,035 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.64 · 42.4% (862 of 2,035 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.68 · 25.1% (510 of 2,035 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (277 of 2,035 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.69 · 9.0% (184 of 2,035 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.54 · 14.7% (300 of 2,035 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.40 · 32.7% (665 of 2,035 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.58 · 6.2% (126 of 2,035 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.48 · 13.5% (274 of 2,035 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.44 · 18.1% (368 of 2,035 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.50 · 9.5% (194 of 2,035 decks)
- Realmbreaker, the Invasion Tree relevance 0.60 · 4.5% (91 of 2,035 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.34 · 38.7% (787 of 2,035 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (270 of 2,035 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (186 of 2,035 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.50 · 6.2% (126 of 2,035 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.33 · 35.8% (728 of 2,035 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.36 · 26.2% (534 of 2,035 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (211 of 2,035 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.48 · 6.0% (122 of 2,035 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.41 · 13.4% (273 of 2,035 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.60 · 3.7% (76 of 2,035 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.54 · 4.3% (88 of 2,035 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.37 · 15.2% (310 of 2,035 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (243 of 2,035 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.40 · 7.5% (152 of 2,035 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (209 of 2,035 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.33 · 14.3% (290 of 2,035 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.34 · 11.8% (240 of 2,035 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (89 of 2,035 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.31 · 15.4% (313 of 2,035 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (106 of 2,035 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (204 of 2,035 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 20.5% (417 of 2,035 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.29 · 13.6% (276 of 2,035 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.27 · 18.4% (375 of 2,035 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (73 of 2,035 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (160 of 2,035 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (130 of 2,035 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.28 · 12.1% (246 of 2,035 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.20 · 36.2% (736 of 2,035 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 68.7% (1,398 of 2,035 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (128 of 2,035 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (52 of 2,035 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (193 of 2,035 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (59 of 2,035 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (89 of 2,035 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (143 of 2,035 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (76 of 2,035 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (58 of 2,035 decks)
Enchantments
33
Enchantments
33 Showing 1-10 of 33
All enchantments (33)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.59 · 39.8% (810 of 2,035 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.47 · 49.3% (1,004 of 2,035 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.65 · 8.0% (162 of 2,035 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.53 · 13.1% (266 of 2,035 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.34 · 52.9% (1,076 of 2,035 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.45 · 21.6% (439 of 2,035 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (184 of 2,035 decks)
- Estrid's Invocation relevance 0.61 · 4.6% (93 of 2,035 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.53 · 7.6% (154 of 2,035 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (188 of 2,035 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.51 · 8.4% (171 of 2,035 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.55 · 5.4% (109 of 2,035 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.54 · 5.3% (108 of 2,035 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.51 · 5.5% (111 of 2,035 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.32 · 31.9% (649 of 2,035 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.36 · 19.0% (386 of 2,035 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.35 · 19.5% (396 of 2,035 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.39 · 11.7% (238 of 2,035 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.40 · 9.5% (194 of 2,035 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (225 of 2,035 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (194 of 2,035 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.40 · 7.4% (150 of 2,035 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 51.5% (1,048 of 2,035 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (137 of 2,035 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.35 · 10.0% (203 of 2,035 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (86 of 2,035 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.24 · 37.5% (763 of 2,035 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.23 · 41.9% (852 of 2,035 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (80 of 2,035 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (79 of 2,035 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (60 of 2,035 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (70 of 2,035 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.36 · 2.9% (60 of 2,035 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.69 · 45.4% (924 of 2,035 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.57 · 53.7% (1,093 of 2,035 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.63 · 39.3% (799 of 2,035 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.66 · 30.7% (624 of 2,035 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.64 · 31.0% (630 of 2,035 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.67 · 14.2% (289 of 2,035 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (245 of 2,035 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.49 · 19.2% (390 of 2,035 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.42 · 33.0% (672 of 2,035 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.46 · 20.9% (426 of 2,035 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.47 · 16.5% (336 of 2,035 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.34 · 47.4% (965 of 2,035 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.46 · 15.7% (320 of 2,035 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (196 of 2,035 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.41 · 23.4% (477 of 2,035 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.52 · 7.2% (147 of 2,035 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.38 · 27.9% (568 of 2,035 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.37 · 28.4% (577 of 2,035 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (426 of 2,035 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.42 · 12.1% (246 of 2,035 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.49 · 5.1% (104 of 2,035 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.39 · 13.2% (268 of 2,035 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.35 · 21.2% (432 of 2,035 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.40 · 11.6% (236 of 2,035 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.42 · 8.6% (175 of 2,035 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (190 of 2,035 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (226 of 2,035 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.38 · 11.4% (233 of 2,035 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (148 of 2,035 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.38 · 10.5% (213 of 2,035 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.31 · 23.7% (482 of 2,035 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.22 · 54.0% (1,099 of 2,035 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.28 · 27.1% (552 of 2,035 decks)
- Whirlwind Denial relevance 0.50 · 3.5% (72 of 2,035 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.29 · 21.3% (433 of 2,035 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (147 of 2,035 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.56 · 2.7% (55 of 2,035 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.27 · 28.7% (585 of 2,035 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.34 · 10.4% (212 of 2,035 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 34.1% (694 of 2,035 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (198 of 2,035 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.47 · 3.6% (73 of 2,035 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.34 · 8.8% (180 of 2,035 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (144 of 2,035 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (91 of 2,035 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (92 of 2,035 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.17 · 62.9% (1,281 of 2,035 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.46 · 3.4% (69 of 2,035 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (59 of 2,035 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (133 of 2,035 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.59 · 62.9% (1,280 of 2,035 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.74 · 26.7% (544 of 2,035 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (864 of 2,035 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.58 · 36.5% (743 of 2,035 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.57 · 22.6% (460 of 2,035 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.58 · 16.0% (325 of 2,035 decks)
- Eyes of Gitaxias relevance 0.83 · 4.2% (86 of 2,035 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (272 of 2,035 decks)
- Distorted Curiosity relevance 0.66 · 4.7% (95 of 2,035 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.47 · 17.4% (354 of 2,035 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.40 · 33.5% (681 of 2,035 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.53 · 10.3% (210 of 2,035 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (239 of 2,035 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.39 · 20.8% (423 of 2,035 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.51 · 5.6% (114 of 2,035 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.52 · 5.2% (105 of 2,035 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.56 · 4.5% (91 of 2,035 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.42 · 13.9% (283 of 2,035 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.53 · 4.7% (96 of 2,035 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (204 of 2,035 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.49 · 6.0% (122 of 2,035 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.51 · 4.8% (97 of 2,035 decks)
- Lunar Insight relevance 0.54 · 4.3% (88 of 2,035 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.37 · 19.7% (401 of 2,035 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (99 of 2,035 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.48 · 4.9% (100 of 2,035 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.42 · 9.7% (198 of 2,035 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.46 · 5.6% (113 of 2,035 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.29 · 34.1% (693 of 2,035 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (225 of 2,035 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (103 of 2,035 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.51 · 3.9% (79 of 2,035 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.51 · 3.9% (79 of 2,035 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (209 of 2,035 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (144 of 2,035 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.36 · 8.3% (168 of 2,035 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (184 of 2,035 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.40 · 4.7% (95 of 2,035 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (66 of 2,035 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (61 of 2,035 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.26 · 17.4% (354 of 2,035 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.49 · 2.5% (51 of 2,035 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (55 of 2,035 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.22 · 28.0% (569 of 2,035 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (68 of 2,035 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (114 of 2,035 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (51 of 2,035 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.24 · 17.1% (347 of 2,035 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (70 of 2,035 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.46 · 2.5% (50 of 2,035 decks)
Planeswalkers
14
Planeswalkers
14 Showing 1-10 of 14
All planeswalkers (14)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.37 · 55.0% (1,119 of 2,035 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.50 · 19.9% (405 of 2,035 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (270 of 2,035 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.41 · 23.4% (476 of 2,035 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.57 · 5.2% (106 of 2,035 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.50 · 5.8% (118 of 2,035 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.48 · 6.9% (141 of 2,035 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (104 of 2,035 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.33 · 6.2% (126 of 2,035 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (56 of 2,035 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (55 of 2,035 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (51 of 2,035 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (58 of 2,035 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.39 · 2.5% (50 of 2,035 decks)
Utility Lands
39
Utility Lands
39 Showing 1-10 of 39
All utility lands (39)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.56 · 42.6% (867 of 2,035 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.65 · 9.7% (197 of 2,035 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.52 · 6.3% (128 of 2,035 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.34 · 32.8% (668 of 2,035 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.43 · 10.1% (205 of 2,035 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (155 of 2,035 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.53 · 3.9% (80 of 2,035 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (157 of 2,035 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.41 · 8.4% (171 of 2,035 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (251 of 2,035 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.32 · 21.8% (443 of 2,035 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 17.3% (353 of 2,035 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.31 · 15.2% (310 of 2,035 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (166 of 2,035 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.40 · 4.8% (97 of 2,035 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.27 · 25.4% (516 of 2,035 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (173 of 2,035 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (106 of 2,035 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 30.3% (616 of 2,035 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (136 of 2,035 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.24 · 30.9% (629 of 2,035 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (298 of 2,035 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (91 of 2,035 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (134 of 2,035 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (147 of 2,035 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (161 of 2,035 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 72.5% (1,475 of 2,035 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (108 of 2,035 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (99 of 2,035 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (56 of 2,035 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 57.3% (1,167 of 2,035 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (218 of 2,035 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (79 of 2,035 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (96 of 2,035 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (55 of 2,035 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (53 of 2,035 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (87 of 2,035 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (78 of 2,035 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (60 of 2,035 decks)
Lands
18
Lands
18 Showing 1-10 of 18
All lands (18)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.33 · 13.1% (266 of 2,035 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.30 · 18.3% (373 of 2,035 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (172 of 2,035 decks)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (56 of 2,035 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (132 of 2,035 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (112 of 2,035 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (124 of 2,035 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (113 of 2,035 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (105 of 2,035 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.32 · 5.7% (117 of 2,035 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (60 of 2,035 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.41 · 3.4% (70 of 2,035 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (64 of 2,035 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (63 of 2,035 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (58 of 2,035 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (177 of 2,035 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (55 of 2,035 decks)
- Island relevance 0.03 · 88.7% (1,805 of 2,035 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jin-Gitaxias // The Great Synthesis, from 2,035 real Commander decks.