Time Stretch
Played in 1,868 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
6.6% Simic
3030+9+4+9+26+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 2.74 · 7.9% (493 of 6,268 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 2.44 · 7.9% (249 of 3,159 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 2.44 · 11.0% (131 of 1,191 decks)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 1.87 · 6.5% (95 of 1,457 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 1.22 · 3.4% (54 of 1,598 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 1.13 · 2.7% (64 of 2,377 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.91 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.87 · 1.6% (76 of 4,757 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.87 · 1.3% (125 of 9,304 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.83 · 3.2% (15 of 466 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.77 · 1.5% (48 of 3,104 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Graham O'Brien relevance 0.74 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (3 of 25 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.70 · 2.3% (15 of 643 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.62 · 2.4% (10 of 410 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.52 · 1.0% (33 of 3,297 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.48 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.46 · 1.2% (15 of 1,265 decks)
- Beast, Erudite Aerialist relevance 0.42 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (3 of 102 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.39 · 1.6% (6 of 376 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Third Doctor relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.35 · 1.8% (4 of 219 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Rikala, Homarid King relevance 0.28 · 1.2% (4 of 324 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Kiora of Salt and Sand relevance 0.21 · 1.1% (3 of 283 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.41 · 36.4% (680 of 1,868 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.18 · 27.8% (519 of 1,868 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.15 · 28.4% (531 of 1,868 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 1.06 · 23.0% (429 of 1,868 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 1.05 · 33.5% (625 of 1,868 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 1.05 · 24.8% (464 of 1,868 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.04 · 24.4% (456 of 1,868 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.03 · 35.3% (659 of 1,868 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.89 · 16.4% (306 of 1,868 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.88 · 19.0% (354 of 1,868 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.84 · 25.7% (480 of 1,868 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (360 of 1,868 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.79 · 16.7% (312 of 1,868 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.79 · 24.1% (451 of 1,868 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.79 · 16.1% (300 of 1,868 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (412 of 1,868 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.73 · 22.4% (418 of 1,868 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.71 · 28.9% (539 of 1,868 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.71 · 18.5% (345 of 1,868 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (294 of 1,868 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.68 · 37.2% (694 of 1,868 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (307 of 1,868 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.66 · 16.3% (305 of 1,868 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.65 · 26.8% (501 of 1,868 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.63 · 16.0% (299 of 1,868 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (296 of 1,868 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.62 · 23.5% (439 of 1,868 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.62 · 15.3% (285 of 1,868 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.58 · 45.7% (853 of 1,868 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.57 · 28.6% (534 of 1,868 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.03 · 35.3% (659 of 1,868 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (412 of 1,868 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.73 · 22.4% (418 of 1,868 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.71 · 18.5% (345 of 1,868 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.68 · 37.2% (694 of 1,868 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.55 · 14.3% (267 of 1,868 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.46 · 12.8% (240 of 1,868 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.46 · 11.6% (216 of 1,868 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.46 · 16.3% (305 of 1,868 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Omniscience relevance 1.05 · 33.5% (625 of 1,868 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.63 · 16.0% (299 of 1,868 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (296 of 1,868 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (257 of 1,868 decks)
All instants (9)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.41 · 36.4% (680 of 1,868 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.84 · 25.7% (480 of 1,868 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.62 · 23.5% (439 of 1,868 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.57 · 28.6% (534 of 1,868 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (272 of 1,868 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.52 · 20.4% (381 of 1,868 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.50 · 21.1% (395 of 1,868 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (273 of 1,868 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.45 · 19.4% (362 of 1,868 decks)
All sorceries (26)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.18 · 27.8% (519 of 1,868 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.15 · 28.4% (531 of 1,868 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 1.06 · 23.0% (429 of 1,868 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 1.05 · 24.8% (464 of 1,868 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.04 · 24.4% (456 of 1,868 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.89 · 16.4% (306 of 1,868 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.88 · 19.0% (354 of 1,868 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (360 of 1,868 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.79 · 16.7% (312 of 1,868 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.79 · 24.1% (451 of 1,868 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.79 · 16.1% (300 of 1,868 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.71 · 28.9% (539 of 1,868 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (294 of 1,868 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (307 of 1,868 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.66 · 16.3% (305 of 1,868 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.65 · 26.8% (501 of 1,868 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.62 · 15.3% (285 of 1,868 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.58 · 45.7% (853 of 1,868 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.56 · 11.1% (207 of 1,868 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (233 of 1,868 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.53 · 19.1% (356 of 1,868 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.52 · 37.4% (698 of 1,868 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (234 of 1,868 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.51 · 19.3% (361 of 1,868 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (176 of 1,868 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.46 · 35.2% (658 of 1,868 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.61 · 27.4% (511 of 1,868 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.59 · 19.0% (355 of 1,868 decks)
EDH data for Time Stretch: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,868 real decks.















































































