Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.53 · 35.6% (113 of 317 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.47 · 25.2% (80 of 317 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.45 · 25.9% (82 of 317 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.32 · 49.2% (156 of 317 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.45 · 15.5% (49 of 317 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.36 · 36.3% (115 of 317 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.34 · 36.0% (114 of 317 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.42 · 13.6% (43 of 317 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.33 · 34.1% (108 of 317 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.30 · 43.2% (137 of 317 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.32 · 33.8% (107 of 317 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.32 · 36.0% (114 of 317 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (36 of 317 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.30 · 40.7% (129 of 317 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.36 · 23.0% (73 of 317 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.33 · 31.5% (100 of 317 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.35 · 26.5% (84 of 317 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.36 · 23.0% (73 of 317 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (23 of 317 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (53 of 317 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.32 · 29.3% (93 of 317 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.32 · 30.6% (97 of 317 decks)
- Countersculpt relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (21 of 317 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.34 · 22.4% (71 of 317 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.32 · 26.8% (85 of 317 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.25 · 50.2% (159 of 317 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (62 of 317 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.37 · 13.6% (43 of 317 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.31 · 29.7% (94 of 317 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.32 · 25.2% (80 of 317 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.35 · 17.0% (54 of 317 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.37 · 13.9% (44 of 317 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.30 · 33.8% (107 of 317 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (65 of 317 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.29 · 35.3% (112 of 317 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.35 · 15.1% (48 of 317 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (37 of 317 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.29 · 33.8% (107 of 317 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.32 · 21.5% (68 of 317 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (36 of 317 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.28 · 36.3% (115 of 317 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.30 · 28.4% (90 of 317 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.23 · 52.7% (167 of 317 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.35 · 12.9% (41 of 317 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (37 of 317 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (49 of 317 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.27 · 36.6% (116 of 317 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.23 · 52.4% (166 of 317 decks)
Card Stacks
26
Card Stacks
26Showing 1-2 of 26
Cards like Mystical Tutor
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystical Tutor 46%
- Merchant Scroll 36%
- Solve the Equation 35%
- Personal Tutor 17%
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Academy Wall, Windrider Wizard
Cards like Swan Song
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 64%
- Strix Serenade 34%
Cards like Force of Negation
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 50%
- Force of Will 43%
Cards like Mystic Remora
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 53%
- Rhystic Study 52%
Cards like Flusterstorm
7.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 43%
- Dispel 31%
- Miscast 14%
- Turn Aside 1%
Cards like Chrome Mox
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 28%
- Mox Diamond 26%
Cards like Pongify
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 49%
- Rapid Hybridization 46%
Cards like Sol Ring
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 83%
- Mana Vault 29%
- Grim Monolith 19%
- Basalt Monolith 9%
Cards like Commandeer
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Commandeer 32%
- Misdirection 21%
- Snapback 11%
- Disrupting Shoal 9%
Cards like Rewind
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Time Warp
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Savor the Moment
Cards like Baral, Chief of Compliance
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 65%
- Negate 41%
- Wash Away 7%
- Essence Scatter 6%
- Spell Snare 2%
- Stern Scolding 2%
- Minor Misstep 1%
Other options: False Summoning, Flash Counter, Remove Soul, Wild Unraveling, Envelop, Intervene, Disruption Protocol, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, Nullify, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cyclonic Rift 58%
- Banishing Knack 11%
- Retraction Helix 9%
Cards like Opt
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Mirrormade
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Murmuring Mystic
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Stifle
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Stifle 26%
- Tale's End 6%
- Consign to Memory 3%
- Defabricate 3%
Cards like Preordain
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 37%
- Serum Visions 11%
- Deliberate 2%
Other options: Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Narset's Reversal
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
- Narset's Reversal 37%
- Twincast 3%
- Insidious Will 2%
Cards like Lotus Petal
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Bribery
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like High Fae Trickster
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Borne Upon a Wind
7.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Borne Upon a Wind 22%
- Quicken 4%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.53 · 35.6% (113 of 317 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.32 · 49.2% (156 of 317 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.30 · 40.7% (129 of 317 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.36 · 23.0% (73 of 317 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.32 · 29.3% (93 of 317 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.32 · 26.8% (85 of 317 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.32 · 25.2% (80 of 317 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.28 · 36.3% (115 of 317 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.23 · 52.7% (167 of 317 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.36 · 11.4% (36 of 317 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.32 · 15.8% (50 of 317 decks)
- Bilbo, Thief in the Night relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.24 · 42.3% (134 of 317 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.29 · 21.1% (67 of 317 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.30 · 15.5% (49 of 317 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.29 · 18.6% (59 of 317 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.26 · 25.2% (80 of 317 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.27 · 20.5% (65 of 317 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.20 · 49.2% (156 of 317 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (20 of 317 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.33 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.26 · 19.2% (61 of 317 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (30 of 317 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (23 of 317 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.28 · 10.1% (32 of 317 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.30 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.24 · 18.9% (60 of 317 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (19 of 317 decks)
- Guile relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (15 of 317 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.23 · 19.6% (62 of 317 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (34 of 317 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (14 of 317 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (19 of 317 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.19 · 28.4% (90 of 317 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (15 of 317 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (25 of 317 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Dirgur Focusmage // Braingeyser relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (21 of 317 decks)
- Variable Chaser // Arc of Fortune relevance 0.36 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (30 of 317 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Muse Seeker relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.32 · 33.8% (107 of 317 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.35 · 26.5% (84 of 317 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.30 · 28.4% (90 of 317 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.32 · 18.6% (59 of 317 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.28 · 29.0% (92 of 317 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.24 · 40.4% (128 of 317 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (95 of 317 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.28 · 24.0% (76 of 317 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.37 · 6.0% (19 of 317 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.26 · 27.4% (87 of 317 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.35 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (34 of 317 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.24 · 25.9% (82 of 317 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.29 · 11.0% (35 of 317 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (15 of 317 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (23 of 317 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.26 · 12.6% (40 of 317 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (16 of 317 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.18 · 32.5% (103 of 317 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 23.3% (74 of 317 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.20 · 14.5% (46 of 317 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (23 of 317 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (15 of 317 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.21 · 9.5% (30 of 317 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (14 of 317 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.18 · 11.4% (36 of 317 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (21 of 317 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 17.4% (55 of 317 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (14 of 317 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (22 of 317 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Disruptor Flute relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.08 · 66.9% (212 of 317 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.16 · 6.6% (21 of 317 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 18.9% (60 of 317 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.10 · 39.1% (124 of 317 decks)
Enchantments
36
Enchantments
36 Showing 1-10 of 36
All enchantments (36)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.37 · 13.9% (44 of 317 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.35 · 12.9% (41 of 317 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (32 of 317 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (23 of 317 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.30 · 15.8% (50 of 317 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (29 of 317 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (49 of 317 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 52.7% (167 of 317 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (36 of 317 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (46 of 317 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (40 of 317 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 52.1% (165 of 317 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (20 of 317 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Cast Through Time relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Way of the Cryomancer relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Precognition Field relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.15 · 30.3% (96 of 317 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.18 · 12.9% (41 of 317 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.19 · 6.9% (22 of 317 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Stifle relevance 0.45 · 25.9% (82 of 317 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.36 · 36.3% (115 of 317 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.34 · 36.0% (114 of 317 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.33 · 34.1% (108 of 317 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.30 · 43.2% (137 of 317 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.33 · 31.5% (100 of 317 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.36 · 23.0% (73 of 317 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.32 · 30.6% (97 of 317 decks)
- Countersculpt relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (21 of 317 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.34 · 22.4% (71 of 317 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.25 · 50.2% (159 of 317 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (62 of 317 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.37 · 13.6% (43 of 317 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.31 · 29.7% (94 of 317 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.30 · 33.8% (107 of 317 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.32 · 21.5% (68 of 317 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (36 of 317 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (49 of 317 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.27 · 36.6% (116 of 317 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.23 · 52.4% (166 of 317 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.36 · 10.7% (34 of 317 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.29 · 26.5% (84 of 317 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.24 · 42.6% (135 of 317 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.27 · 29.7% (94 of 317 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.31 · 14.5% (46 of 317 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.28 · 24.9% (79 of 317 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.18 · 64.4% (204 of 317 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.22 · 45.7% (145 of 317 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.21 · 49.8% (158 of 317 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.28 · 19.2% (61 of 317 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (31 of 317 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.29 · 14.8% (47 of 317 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (19 of 317 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.19 · 51.7% (164 of 317 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.22 · 36.9% (117 of 317 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (27 of 317 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.17 · 57.7% (183 of 317 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.31 · 8.5% (27 of 317 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.33 · 5.7% (18 of 317 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.23 · 27.8% (88 of 317 decks)
- Suspend relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (19 of 317 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.25 · 16.1% (51 of 317 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.23 · 25.2% (80 of 317 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (20 of 317 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (22 of 317 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.14 · 67.5% (214 of 317 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (15 of 317 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.45 · 15.5% (49 of 317 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.42 · 13.6% (43 of 317 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.32 · 36.0% (114 of 317 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (36 of 317 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (53 of 317 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.35 · 17.0% (54 of 317 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (65 of 317 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.29 · 35.3% (112 of 317 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.35 · 15.1% (48 of 317 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (37 of 317 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.29 · 33.8% (107 of 317 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (37 of 317 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (19 of 317 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (22 of 317 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.32 · 9.1% (29 of 317 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (30 of 317 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (40 of 317 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (21 of 317 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.26 · 15.5% (49 of 317 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (29 of 317 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.18 · 49.2% (156 of 317 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.30 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.21 · 32.2% (102 of 317 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (18 of 317 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 36.9% (117 of 317 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (21 of 317 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (18 of 317 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (18 of 317 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (42 of 317 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (14 of 317 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (34 of 317 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (23 of 317 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.19 · 21.1% (67 of 317 decks)
- Piracy relevance 0.38 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (15 of 317 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.34 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.22 · 5.7% (18 of 317 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Polymorph relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Arcane Heist relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (18 of 317 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.30 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
Planeswalkers
13
Planeswalkers
13 Showing 1-10 of 13
All planeswalkers (13)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.47 · 25.2% (80 of 317 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (23 of 317 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (65 of 317 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.23 · 22.4% (71 of 317 decks)
- Jace, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (17 of 317 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
Utility Lands
42
Utility Lands
42 Showing 1-10 of 42
All utility lands (42)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (59 of 317 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.32 · 15.8% (50 of 317 decks)
- Theorist's Sanctum relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.23 · 27.4% (87 of 317 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.19 · 46.4% (147 of 317 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.23 · 21.5% (68 of 317 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 27.8% (88 of 317 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.24 · 13.9% (44 of 317 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 38.2% (121 of 317 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (37 of 317 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (22 of 317 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 16.4% (52 of 317 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (28 of 317 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (15 of 317 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (18 of 317 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (14 of 317 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (34 of 317 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.11 · 55.8% (177 of 317 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (26 of 317 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 12.6% (40 of 317 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.17 · 7.6% (24 of 317 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 9.8% (31 of 317 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (13 of 317 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (19 of 317 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 42.9% (136 of 317 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (12 of 317 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (9 of 317 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
Lands
21
Lands
21 Showing 1-10 of 21
All lands (21)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.32 · 23.0% (73 of 317 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.30 · 21.8% (69 of 317 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.35 · 10.7% (34 of 317 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.29 · 20.2% (64 of 317 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.29 · 21.1% (67 of 317 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.29 · 21.1% (67 of 317 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.27 · 26.8% (85 of 317 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.31 · 12.3% (39 of 317 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (20 of 317 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (34 of 317 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.20 · 15.1% (48 of 317 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.17 · 13.9% (44 of 317 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (10 of 317 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (8 of 317 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (7 of 317 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 79.8% (253 of 317 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun, from 317 real Commander decks.