Journey of Discovery
Played in 133 Abzan decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (3)
- Tymna the Weaver // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.46 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.38 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Summer Bloom relevance 1.51 · 27.1% (36 of 133 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.28 · 30.8% (41 of 133 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.24 · 36.8% (49 of 133 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.94 · 25.6% (34 of 133 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.93 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.90 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.89 · 30.8% (41 of 133 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.88 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.85 · 34.6% (46 of 133 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.83 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.78 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.74 · 24.8% (33 of 133 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.72 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (16 of 133 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.71 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.70 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.69 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.68 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Rootpath Purifier relevance 0.67 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 25.6% (34 of 133 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.67 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 23.3% (31 of 133 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.65 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 0.65 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.65 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.65 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.64 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.94 · 25.6% (34 of 133 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.90 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.85 · 34.6% (46 of 133 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.78 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.71 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.70 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.69 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.68 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Rootpath Purifier relevance 0.67 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 25.6% (34 of 133 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 0.65 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.65 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.64 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.63 · 17.3% (23 of 133 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.60 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.55 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.49 · 19.5% (26 of 133 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 23.3% (31 of 133 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.65 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.65 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.61 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (20 of 133 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Druid Class relevance 1.28 · 30.8% (41 of 133 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.83 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.72 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.67 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
- Glare of Subdual relevance 0.64 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
All instants (3)
- Harrow relevance 0.89 · 30.8% (41 of 133 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.53 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Summer Bloom relevance 1.51 · 27.1% (36 of 133 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.24 · 36.8% (49 of 133 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.93 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.88 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.74 · 24.8% (33 of 133 decks)
- Merciless Eviction relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (16 of 133 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Umbral Expanse relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
All lands (7)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.68 · 25.6% (34 of 133 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.65 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.59 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.54 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.52 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.50 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
EDH data for Journey of Discovery: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 133 real decks.