Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 2.43 · 8.0% (87 of 1,087 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.74 · 3.7% (71 of 1,942 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.40 · 3.2% (37 of 1,159 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 1.27 · 4.1% (19 of 466 decks)
- Venus, Torn Between Worlds relevance 1.08 · 4.7% (10 of 213 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.00 · 1.0% (97 of 9,304 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 1.00 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.00 · 2.2% (20 of 892 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.96 · 1.4% (43 of 3,159 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.95 · 2.9% (12 of 410 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 0.92 · 2.0% (18 of 883 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Durnan of the Yawning Portal relevance 0.85 · 12.0% (3 of 25 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.71 · 1.7% (11 of 643 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.71 · 1.5% (13 of 853 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.66 · 1.4% (12 of 853 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.66 · 1.7% (9 of 533 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 0.61 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.60 · 1.2% (12 of 1,020 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.60 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.57 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.54 · 1.2% (9 of 753 decks)
- Guru Pathik relevance 0.54 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.54 · 3.2% (3 of 93 decks)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 0.53 · 1.6% (6 of 384 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.52 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Sixth Doctor relevance 0.33 · 1.9% (2 of 106 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.72 · 31.4% (334 of 1,064 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.70 · 17.9% (190 of 1,064 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.70 · 23.1% (246 of 1,064 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.66 · 34.7% (369 of 1,064 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.66 · 24.9% (265 of 1,064 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (157 of 1,064 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.61 · 18.7% (199 of 1,064 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (136 of 1,064 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.59 · 43.0% (457 of 1,064 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.59 · 27.7% (295 of 1,064 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.57 · 14.3% (152 of 1,064 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.57 · 25.1% (267 of 1,064 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.57 · 29.1% (310 of 1,064 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (181 of 1,064 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (143 of 1,064 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.54 · 28.4% (302 of 1,064 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.53 · 28.5% (303 of 1,064 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.51 · 25.1% (267 of 1,064 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.51 · 23.7% (252 of 1,064 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.50 · 13.3% (141 of 1,064 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (125 of 1,064 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.50 · 16.1% (171 of 1,064 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.49 · 17.5% (186 of 1,064 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.48 · 22.9% (244 of 1,064 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.47 · 20.7% (220 of 1,064 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.46 · 12.0% (128 of 1,064 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.46 · 16.2% (172 of 1,064 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (79 of 1,064 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (131 of 1,064 decks)
- Malanthrope relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (82 of 1,064 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.72 · 31.4% (334 of 1,064 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.70 · 17.9% (190 of 1,064 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.70 · 23.1% (246 of 1,064 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.66 · 34.7% (369 of 1,064 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.66 · 24.9% (265 of 1,064 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (157 of 1,064 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.61 · 18.7% (199 of 1,064 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (136 of 1,064 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.59 · 43.0% (457 of 1,064 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.59 · 27.7% (295 of 1,064 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.57 · 14.3% (152 of 1,064 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.57 · 25.1% (267 of 1,064 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.57 · 29.1% (310 of 1,064 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (181 of 1,064 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (143 of 1,064 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.54 · 28.4% (302 of 1,064 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.53 · 28.5% (303 of 1,064 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.51 · 25.1% (267 of 1,064 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.51 · 23.7% (252 of 1,064 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.50 · 13.3% (141 of 1,064 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (125 of 1,064 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.50 · 16.1% (171 of 1,064 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.49 · 17.5% (186 of 1,064 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.48 · 22.9% (244 of 1,064 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.47 · 20.7% (220 of 1,064 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.46 · 12.0% (128 of 1,064 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.46 · 16.2% (172 of 1,064 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (79 of 1,064 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (131 of 1,064 decks)
- Malanthrope relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (82 of 1,064 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.45 · 10.8% (115 of 1,064 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (77 of 1,064 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.45 · 19.0% (202 of 1,064 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (122 of 1,064 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (114 of 1,064 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (120 of 1,064 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (114 of 1,064 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.42 · 8.6% (91 of 1,064 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (80 of 1,064 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.42 · 8.6% (92 of 1,064 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (128 of 1,064 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (187 of 1,064 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 0.42 · 17.9% (190 of 1,064 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.43 · 34.1% (363 of 1,064 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.43 · 11.2% (119 of 1,064 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.58 · 33.0% (351 of 1,064 decks)
All lands (4)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.50 · 14.8% (158 of 1,064 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.45 · 27.7% (295 of 1,064 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.44 · 27.7% (295 of 1,064 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (147 of 1,064 decks)
EDH data for Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,064 real decks.