Prismatic Vista
Played in 14,050 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
5.1% Green
- Golgari 14,861 · 5.3%
- Izzet 14,503 · 5.2%
- Green 14,050 · 5.1%
- Gruul 13,863 · 5.0%
- Simic 13,674 · 4.9%
- Dimir 12,851 · 4.6%
- Orzhov 12,525 · 4.5%
- Boros 12,257 · 4.4%
- Rakdos 12,250 · 4.4%
- Jund 12,206 · 4.4%
- Five-Color 11,859 · 4.3%
- Sultai 11,194 · 4.0%
- Esper 10,946 · 3.9%
- Temur 10,223 · 3.7%
- Naya 9,965 · 3.6%
- Azorius 9,753 · 3.5%
- Grixis 9,435 · 3.4%
- Mardu 8,728 · 3.1%
- Selesnya 7,952 · 2.9%
- Bant 7,528 · 2.7%
- Blue 7,512 · 2.7%
- Black 6,939 · 2.5%
- Jeskai 6,711 · 2.4%
- Abzan 6,654 · 2.4%
- Red 6,471 · 2.3%
- Other (7) 13,037 · 4.7%
All commanders (30)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 2.69 · 37.8% (2,345 of 6,198 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 2.21 · 44.8% (369 of 824 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.12 · 23.5% (2,342 of 9,987 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.01 · 34.1% (444 of 1,301 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.92 · 24.8% (896 of 3,618 decks)
- Maular, the Next Evolution relevance 1.82 · 27.4% (460 of 1,677 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.62 · 31.9% (156 of 489 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.60 · 18.4% (797 of 4,331 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 1.51 · 23.6% (244 of 1,034 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 1.48 · 27.3% (147 of 539 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 1.24 · 13.4% (518 of 3,860 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.19 · 16.8% (191 of 1,140 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 1.08 · 19.3% (80 of 414 decks)
- Six relevance 1.04 · 12.5% (233 of 1,871 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.03 · 15.3% (120 of 782 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 1.02 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 10.1% (167 of 1,659 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.80 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.71 · 11.8% (47 of 400 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.68 · 7.2% (176 of 2,430 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.68 · 6.7% (232 of 3,442 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.64 · 8.1% (88 of 1,084 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.61 · 11.0% (31 of 281 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.58 · 7.0% (89 of 1,263 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.58 · 9.5% (37 of 388 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.56 · 7.2% (69 of 958 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.54 · 7.6% (53 of 697 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.49 · 6.6% (53 of 798 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (27 of 319 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (52 of 842 decks)
All most relevant (27)
- Exploration relevance 1.07 · 57.1% (8,023 of 14,050 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 38.0% (5,341 of 14,050 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.06 · 47.1% (6,619 of 14,050 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.03 · 60.5% (8,504 of 14,050 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.02 · 45.0% (6,322 of 14,050 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.02 · 53.2% (7,475 of 14,050 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.91 · 50.4% (7,078 of 14,050 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.89 · 50.8% (7,141 of 14,050 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.88 · 29.9% (4,195 of 14,050 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.85 · 27.6% (3,880 of 14,050 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.84 · 47.7% (6,696 of 14,050 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.83 · 41.3% (5,806 of 14,050 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.82 · 43.9% (6,172 of 14,050 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.81 · 34.7% (4,881 of 14,050 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.81 · 31.7% (4,451 of 14,050 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.80 · 24.4% (3,423 of 14,050 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.78 · 26.4% (3,705 of 14,050 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.77 · 27.8% (3,907 of 14,050 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.75 · 27.4% (3,856 of 14,050 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.75 · 39.5% (5,544 of 14,050 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.75 · 30.3% (4,254 of 14,050 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.75 · 31.8% (4,471 of 14,050 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.74 · 38.7% (5,444 of 14,050 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.74 · 26.2% (3,684 of 14,050 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.72 · 24.2% (3,398 of 14,050 decks)
- Six relevance 0.72 · 26.0% (3,650 of 14,050 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.72 · 50.7% (7,120 of 14,050 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.06 · 47.1% (6,619 of 14,050 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.02 · 45.0% (6,322 of 14,050 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.02 · 53.2% (7,475 of 14,050 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.88 · 29.9% (4,195 of 14,050 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.85 · 27.6% (3,880 of 14,050 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.83 · 41.3% (5,806 of 14,050 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.82 · 43.9% (6,172 of 14,050 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.81 · 34.7% (4,881 of 14,050 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.81 · 31.7% (4,451 of 14,050 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.75 · 27.4% (3,856 of 14,050 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.75 · 39.5% (5,544 of 14,050 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.75 · 30.3% (4,254 of 14,050 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.75 · 31.8% (4,471 of 14,050 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.74 · 38.7% (5,444 of 14,050 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.74 · 26.2% (3,684 of 14,050 decks)
- Six relevance 0.72 · 26.0% (3,650 of 14,050 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.80 · 24.4% (3,423 of 14,050 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.78 · 26.4% (3,705 of 14,050 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.77 · 27.8% (3,907 of 14,050 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.72 · 24.2% (3,398 of 14,050 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Exploration relevance 1.07 · 57.1% (8,023 of 14,050 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.89 · 50.8% (7,141 of 14,050 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.03 · 60.5% (8,504 of 14,050 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.72 · 50.7% (7,120 of 14,050 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 38.0% (5,341 of 14,050 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.91 · 50.4% (7,078 of 14,050 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.84 · 47.7% (6,696 of 14,050 decks)
All utility lands (11)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.00 · 67.6% (9,495 of 14,050 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 1.00 · 73.5% (10,325 of 14,050 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.95 · 34.1% (4,795 of 14,050 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.87 · 29.8% (4,180 of 14,050 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.86 · 31.4% (4,416 of 14,050 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.85 · 29.5% (4,144 of 14,050 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.85 · 42.7% (6,003 of 14,050 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.80 · 24.5% (3,445 of 14,050 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.79 · 24.0% (3,374 of 14,050 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.76 · 30.7% (4,318 of 14,050 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.73 · 29.5% (4,138 of 14,050 decks)
All lands (12)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 1.83 · 77.2% (10,847 of 14,050 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.79 · 75.2% (10,572 of 14,050 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 1.76 · 75.3% (10,581 of 14,050 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 1.75 · 76.7% (10,781 of 14,050 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 1.35 · 70.0% (9,832 of 14,050 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.87 · 36.1% (5,070 of 14,050 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.84 · 27.4% (3,847 of 14,050 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.80 · 27.5% (3,857 of 14,050 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.76 · 34.3% (4,823 of 14,050 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.76 · 22.7% (3,185 of 14,050 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.74 · 22.9% (3,219 of 14,050 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.71 · 26.6% (3,742 of 14,050 decks)
EDH data for Prismatic Vista: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 14,050 real decks.