Lotus Vale

Played in 456 Naya decks

Lotus Vale
$47.38 €26.91

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
All commanders (7)
  1. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.85 · 1.7% (72 of 4,214 decks)
  2. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.41 · 1.2% (43 of 3,621 decks)
  3. Johan relevance 1.15 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
  4. Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.59 · 1.1% (4 of 353 decks)
  5. Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.27 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
  6. Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
  7. Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.37 47.1%
    $6.61 €6.67
  • Zuran Orb
    1.26 48.5%
    $3.51 €1.80
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.18 46.1%
    $5.61 €6.44
  • Crop Rotation
    1.18 47.6%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Scapeshift
    1.14 29.8%
    $41.48 €32.65
  • Amulet of Vigor
    1.13 33.1%
    $50.54 €33.91
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.04 32.5%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.02 37.7%
    $9.88 €6.51
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.02 28.3%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.96 24.8%
    $32.32 €20.30
All most relevant (30)
  1. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.37 · 47.1% (215 of 456 decks)
  2. Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 48.5% (221 of 456 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 46.1% (210 of 456 decks)
  4. Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 47.6% (217 of 456 decks)
  5. Scapeshift relevance 1.14 · 29.8% (136 of 456 decks)
  6. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.13 · 33.1% (151 of 456 decks)
  7. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.04 · 32.5% (148 of 456 decks)
  8. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 37.7% (172 of 456 decks)
  9. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
  10. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 24.8% (113 of 456 decks)
  11. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (194 of 456 decks)
  12. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
  13. Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
  14. Badgermole Cub relevance 0.85 · 32.2% (147 of 456 decks)
  15. Exploration relevance 0.84 · 26.8% (122 of 456 decks)
  16. Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (76 of 456 decks)
  17. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 21.9% (100 of 456 decks)
  18. Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.80 · 28.1% (128 of 456 decks)
  19. Constant Mists relevance 0.80 · 19.1% (87 of 456 decks)
  20. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (88 of 456 decks)
  21. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
  22. Spelunking relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (106 of 456 decks)
  23. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
  24. Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.6% (94 of 456 decks)
  25. Dune Chanter relevance 0.74 · 22.8% (104 of 456 decks)
  26. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.73 · 17.1% (78 of 456 decks)
  27. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.72 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
  28. Brightglass Gearhulk relevance 0.71 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
  29. Desert Warfare relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (86 of 456 decks)
  30. Scute Swarm relevance 0.70 · 30.3% (138 of 456 decks)

Creatures

16

Showing 1-10 of 16

Page size
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.37 47.1%
    $6.61 €6.67
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.18 46.1%
    $5.61 €6.44
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.04 32.5%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.02 37.7%
    $9.88 €6.51
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.02 28.3%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.95 42.5%
    $4.19 €3.03
  • Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
    0.85 29.2%
    $15.28 €16.34
  • Badgermole Cub
    0.85 32.2%
    $45.17 €52.71
  • Elvish Reclaimer
    0.80 19.3%
    $5.11 €5.47
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.78 24.1%
    $12.76 €10.17
All creatures (16)
  1. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.37 · 47.1% (215 of 456 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 46.1% (210 of 456 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.04 · 32.5% (148 of 456 decks)
  4. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 37.7% (172 of 456 decks)
  5. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (194 of 456 decks)
  7. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
  8. Badgermole Cub relevance 0.85 · 32.2% (147 of 456 decks)
  9. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (88 of 456 decks)
  10. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
  12. Dune Chanter relevance 0.74 · 22.8% (104 of 456 decks)
  13. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.73 · 17.1% (78 of 456 decks)
  14. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.72 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
  15. Brightglass Gearhulk relevance 0.71 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
  16. Scute Swarm relevance 0.70 · 30.3% (138 of 456 decks)

Artifacts

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.26 48.5%
    $3.51 €1.80
  • Amulet of Vigor
    1.13 33.1%
    $50.54 €33.91
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.96 24.8%
    $32.32 €20.30
  • Liquimetal Torque
    0.85 29.2%
    $2.89 €2.60
  • Candelabra of Tawnos
    0.84 16.7%
    $2850.00 €1961.17
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.81 21.9%
    $1.13 €1.42
  • Ichor Wellspring
    0.80 28.1%
    $1.54 €0.87
  • Expedition Map
    0.74 20.6%
    $1.37 €1.34
All artifacts (8)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 48.5% (221 of 456 decks)
  2. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.13 · 33.1% (151 of 456 decks)
  3. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 24.8% (113 of 456 decks)
  4. Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
  5. Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (76 of 456 decks)
  6. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 21.9% (100 of 456 decks)
  7. Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.80 · 28.1% (128 of 456 decks)
  8. Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.6% (94 of 456 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.84 26.8%
    $30.16 €26.59
  • Spelunking
    0.77 23.2%
    $3.57 €3.20
  • Desert Warfare
    0.70 18.9%
    $0.42 €0.56
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.84 · 26.8% (122 of 456 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (106 of 456 decks)
  3. Desert Warfare relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (86 of 456 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.18 47.6%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Constant Mists
    0.80 19.1%
    $20.35 €14.60
All instants (2)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 47.6% (217 of 456 decks)
  2. Constant Mists relevance 0.80 · 19.1% (87 of 456 decks)

Sorceries

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    1.14 29.8%
    $41.48 €32.65
All sorceries (1)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 1.14 · 29.8% (136 of 456 decks)

Utility Lands

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Urza's Saga
    0.98 33.3%
    $38.61 €40.72
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.90 51.3%
    $17.18 €13.09
  • Arid Archway
    0.86 23.5%
    $1.47 €0.55
  • Ramunap Ruins
    0.84 24.6%
    $0.33 €0.42
  • Strip Mine
    0.83 21.5%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Shefet Dunes
    0.83 24.1%
    $0.30 €0.31
  • Desert of the Indomitable
    0.82 24.3%
    $0.21 €0.15
  • Desert of the True
    0.82 24.1%
    $0.26 €0.17
  • Field of the Dead
    0.81 24.6%
    $28.53 €26.97
  • Hashep Oasis
    0.80 23.7%
    $0.24 €0.22
All utility lands (15)
  1. Urza's Saga relevance 0.98 · 33.3% (152 of 456 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.90 · 51.3% (234 of 456 decks)
  3. Arid Archway relevance 0.86 · 23.5% (107 of 456 decks)
  4. Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.84 · 24.6% (112 of 456 decks)
  5. Strip Mine relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
  6. Shefet Dunes relevance 0.83 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
  7. Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.82 · 24.3% (111 of 456 decks)
  8. Desert of the True relevance 0.82 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
  9. Field of the Dead relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (112 of 456 decks)
  10. Hashep Oasis relevance 0.80 · 23.7% (108 of 456 decks)
  11. Cactus Preserve relevance 0.77 · 22.4% (102 of 456 decks)
  12. Ba Sing Se relevance 0.77 · 30.9% (141 of 456 decks)
  13. Conduit Pylons relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (101 of 456 decks)
  14. Desert of the Fervent relevance 0.77 · 22.6% (103 of 456 decks)
  15. Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (94 of 456 decks)

Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Lotus Field
    2.54 74.8%
    $2.55 €2.57
  • Vesuva
    0.96 23.9%
    $3.79 €3.08
  • Abraded Bluffs
    0.77 24.1%
    $0.36 €0.26
  • Bristling Backwoods
    0.75 23.9%
    $0.31 €0.18
  • Creosote Heath
    0.75 23.7%
    $0.25 €0.16
All lands (5)
  1. Lotus Field relevance 2.54 · 74.8% (341 of 456 decks)
  2. Vesuva relevance 0.96 · 23.9% (109 of 456 decks)
  3. Abraded Bluffs relevance 0.77 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
  4. Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.75 · 23.9% (109 of 456 decks)
  5. Creosote Heath relevance 0.75 · 23.7% (108 of 456 decks)

EDH data for Lotus Vale: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 456 real decks.