Lotus Vale
Played in 456 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
3.7% Naya
Commanders
7
Commanders
7All commanders (7)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.85 · 1.7% (72 of 4,214 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.41 · 1.2% (43 of 3,621 decks)
- Johan relevance 1.15 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.59 · 1.1% (4 of 353 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.27 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.37 · 47.1% (215 of 456 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 48.5% (221 of 456 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 46.1% (210 of 456 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 47.6% (217 of 456 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.14 · 29.8% (136 of 456 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.13 · 33.1% (151 of 456 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.04 · 32.5% (148 of 456 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 37.7% (172 of 456 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 24.8% (113 of 456 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (194 of 456 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.85 · 32.2% (147 of 456 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.84 · 26.8% (122 of 456 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (76 of 456 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 21.9% (100 of 456 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.80 · 28.1% (128 of 456 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.80 · 19.1% (87 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (88 of 456 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (106 of 456 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.6% (94 of 456 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.74 · 22.8% (104 of 456 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.73 · 17.1% (78 of 456 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.72 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
- Brightglass Gearhulk relevance 0.71 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (86 of 456 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.70 · 30.3% (138 of 456 decks)
Creatures
16
Creatures
16 All creatures (16)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.37 · 47.1% (215 of 456 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 46.1% (210 of 456 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.04 · 32.5% (148 of 456 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 37.7% (172 of 456 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (194 of 456 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.85 · 32.2% (147 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (88 of 456 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.74 · 22.8% (104 of 456 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.73 · 17.1% (78 of 456 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.72 · 28.3% (129 of 456 decks)
- Brightglass Gearhulk relevance 0.71 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.70 · 30.3% (138 of 456 decks)
Artifacts
8
Artifacts
8 All artifacts (8)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 48.5% (221 of 456 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.13 · 33.1% (151 of 456 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 24.8% (113 of 456 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.85 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (76 of 456 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 21.9% (100 of 456 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.80 · 28.1% (128 of 456 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.6% (94 of 456 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 0.84 · 26.8% (122 of 456 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (106 of 456 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (86 of 456 decks)
Instants
2
Instants
2 All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 47.6% (217 of 456 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.80 · 19.1% (87 of 456 decks)
Sorceries
1
Sorceries
1 All sorceries (1)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.14 · 29.8% (136 of 456 decks)
Utility Lands
15
Utility Lands
15 All utility lands (15)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.98 · 33.3% (152 of 456 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.90 · 51.3% (234 of 456 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.86 · 23.5% (107 of 456 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.84 · 24.6% (112 of 456 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 0.83 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.82 · 24.3% (111 of 456 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.82 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (112 of 456 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.80 · 23.7% (108 of 456 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.77 · 22.4% (102 of 456 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.77 · 30.9% (141 of 456 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (101 of 456 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 0.77 · 22.6% (103 of 456 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (94 of 456 decks)
Lands
5
Lands
5 All lands (5)
- Lotus Field relevance 2.54 · 74.8% (341 of 456 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.96 · 23.9% (109 of 456 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 0.77 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.75 · 23.9% (109 of 456 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.75 · 23.7% (108 of 456 decks)
EDH data for Lotus Vale: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 456 real decks.



























































