Change per day
Archetypes
65% of decks lean toward it
42% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Howling Mine
65% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Loran of the Third Path
42% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 71 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Skyshroud Claim
2.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Bant decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Bant decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Skyshroud Claim 35%
- Hunting Wilds 24%
- Ranger's Path 23%
- Three Visits 14%
- Nature's Lore 11%
Other options: Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Migration Path
1.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.78 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Migration Path 30%
- Map the Frontier 26%
- Explosive Vegetation 24%
- Reach the Horizon 19%
- Cultivate 16%
- Terramorph 15%
- New Generation's Technique 13%
- Kodama's Reach 10%
- Verdant Mastery 9%
- Rampant Growth 7%
- Peregrination 2%
- Shared Roots 2%
- Boundless Realms 2%
- Traverse the Outlands 1%
- Search for Tomorrow 1%
- Reshape the Earth 1%
Other options: Viewpoint Synchronization, Celebrate the Harvest, Beneath the Sands, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, Harvest Season
Cards like Propaganda
2.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Propaganda 26%
- Ghostly Prison 20%
- War Tax 1%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
4.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Bant decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Bant decks
Cards like Dictate of Kruphix
7.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards like Howling Mine
10.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Generous Gift
1.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Generous Gift 22%
- Beast Within 21%
Cards like Scrawling Crawler
2.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Path to Exile
3.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Bant decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like On the Trail
9.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards
- On the Trail 16%
- Burgeoning 12%
Cards like Smothering Tithe
3.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Path of the Animist
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.66 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.61 · 25.6% (42 of 164 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.60 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.58 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.58 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.51 · 30.5% (50 of 164 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.53 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.48 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.47 · 24.4% (40 of 164 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.39 · 35.4% (58 of 164 decks)
- Terramorph relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Champions of Minas Tirith relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.40 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 0.39 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.39 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.35 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.36 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.32 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.33 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.35 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Sokrates, Athenian Teacher relevance 0.33 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.35 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.38 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.32 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.35 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.31 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Walking Archive relevance 0.36 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Champions of Minas Tirith relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.32 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Sokrates, Athenian Teacher relevance 0.33 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.31 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Walking Archive relevance 0.36 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.29 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Ori, Plate Stacker relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.30 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 0.30 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Heliod, the Radiant Dawn // Heliod, the Warped Eclipse relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.31 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.30 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 0.26 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.30 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Leela, Sevateem Warrior relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.28 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 0.25 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Loran of the Third Path relevance 0.21 · 29.3% (48 of 164 decks)
- The Legend of Yangchen // Avatar Yangchen relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Kwain, Itinerant Meddler relevance 0.23 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Mangara, the Diplomat relevance 0.24 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.22 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.27 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Detective of the Month relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.22 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Duggan, Private Detective relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Ms. Bumbleflower relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
All artifacts (44)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.36 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.33 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.35 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.34 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.34 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.27 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- TARDIS relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Iron Maiden relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Honor-Worn Shaku relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Fractured Powerstone relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Norn's Annex relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Heroes' Podium relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.13 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.14 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.11 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.04 · 28.7% (47 of 164 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (82 of 164 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.58 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Oath of Teferi relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.27 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.28 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Solitary Confinement relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Trial of a Time Lord relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.27 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.22 · 25.6% (42 of 164 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.24 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Noble Heritage relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.22 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- The Night of the Doctor relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.24 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Oath of Jace relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Frontier Siege relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.17 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- An Unearthly Child relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Day of Destiny relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
All instants (50)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.39 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.35 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.38 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.32 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.35 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Vision Skeins relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Dawn Charm relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.34 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.31 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Sphinx's Revelation relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Holy Day relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.19 · 33.5% (55 of 164 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.25 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.20 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Storm Seeker relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Pollen Lullaby relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Riot Control relevance 0.20 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.16 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.18 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Settle the Wreckage relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Time Lord Regeneration relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.16 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.15 · 22.0% (36 of 164 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.17 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.66 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.61 · 25.6% (42 of 164 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.60 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.58 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.51 · 30.5% (50 of 164 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.48 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.47 · 24.4% (40 of 164 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.39 · 35.4% (58 of 164 decks)
- Terramorph relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.40 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.29 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Fractured Identity relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Prosperity relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.24 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.24 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- What Must Be Done relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Twice Upon a Time // Unlikely Meeting relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Crisis of Conscience relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Restoration Seminar relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.19 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
All planeswalkers (50)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 0.39 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.35 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Elspeth, Knight-Errant relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Teferi, Hero of Dominaria relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Teferi, Who Slows the Sunset relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.28 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- The Wandering Emperor relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.26 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.25 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Archangel Elspeth relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Dovin Baan relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Narset Transcendent relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- The Wanderer relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.18 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Elspeth Tirel relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Venser, the Sojourner relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Ajani Steadfast relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Ajani, Sleeper Agent relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.53 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.38 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.37 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.33 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.34 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Gallifrey Council Chamber relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.26 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.26 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.25 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.25 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.28 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.26 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.22 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 0.36 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.24 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.22 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.22 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.24 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Kor Haven relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.24 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.23 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.21 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Celestial Colonnade relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.18 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.21 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (4 of 164 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.17 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
All lands (50)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.22 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.22 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.23 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.20 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.18 · 31.7% (52 of 164 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.21 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.23 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.19 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.19 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.17 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.19 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.19 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.15 · 40.9% (67 of 164 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.20 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.20 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.20 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.20 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.15 · 33.5% (55 of 164 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.15 · 26.8% (44 of 164 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.14 · 34.1% (56 of 164 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.13 · 39.6% (65 of 164 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.19 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.14 · 34.8% (57 of 164 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (5 of 164 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.15 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.14 · 32.9% (54 of 164 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 38.4% (63 of 164 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.14 · 29.9% (49 of 164 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.16 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 34.8% (57 of 164 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 36.0% (59 of 164 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.17 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (8 of 164 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.12 · 36.6% (60 of 164 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor, from 164 real Commander partner decks.