Cards like Apex Devastator
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
91% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Simic decks
78% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
2.9 per deck on average
vs. 1.3 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 73%
- Kodama's Reach 57%
- Search for Tomorrow 36%
- Rampant Growth 31%
- Migration Path 16%
- Spring // Mind 13%
- Verdant Mastery 12%
- Explosive Vegetation 10%
- Traverse the Outlands 7%
- Boundless Realms 7%
- Map the Frontier 6%
- Beneath the Sands 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Shared Roots 3%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- Reach the Horizon 1%
- Terramorph 1%
- Peregrination 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- They Went This Way 1%
- Celebrate the Harvest 1%
- Reshape the Earth 1%
Other options: Viewpoint Synchronization, Primal Growth, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season
Cards like Sublime Epiphany
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
3.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
9.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 24%
- Mana Reflection 24%
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nulldrifter 48%
- Wretched Gryff 9%
Cards like Thunderous Snapper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
3.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Wood Elves
8.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Entish Restoration
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Entish Restoration 21%
- Harrow 19%
- Roiling Regrowth 4%
- Cycle of Renewal 1%
Other options: Scapeshift, Planar Engineering
Cards like Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Gandalf, Shadow's Foe
Cards like Giant Ankheg
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Giant Ankheg 16%
- Star Whale 3%
Cards like Dawnglade Regent
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dawnglade Regent 28%
- Regal Behemoth 12%
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
9.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 18%
- Swiftfoot Boots 10%
Cards like Growth Spiral
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 45% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 21%
- Eureka Moment 19%
- Joint Exploration 1%
All top picks (50)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.35 · 65.7% (44 of 67 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.29 · 76.1% (51 of 67 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.37 · 47.8% (32 of 67 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.41 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.32 · 58.2% (39 of 67 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.37 · 41.8% (28 of 67 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.30 · 59.7% (40 of 67 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.41 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.38 · 34.3% (23 of 67 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.40 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.41 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.36 · 38.8% (26 of 67 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.34 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.36 · 37.3% (25 of 67 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.41 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.39 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.35 · 37.3% (25 of 67 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.37 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.30 · 50.7% (34 of 67 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.31 · 47.8% (32 of 67 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.41 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.37 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.40 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.38 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.33 · 37.3% (25 of 67 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.29 · 49.3% (33 of 67 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.31 · 40.3% (27 of 67 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.34 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.40 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.33 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.34 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.31 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.32 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.36 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.33 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Lashweed Lurker relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.27 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.35 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.32 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.31 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.35 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.33 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.29 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.35 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.35 · 65.7% (44 of 67 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.29 · 76.1% (51 of 67 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.37 · 47.8% (32 of 67 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.41 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.32 · 58.2% (39 of 67 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.37 · 41.8% (28 of 67 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.30 · 59.7% (40 of 67 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.41 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.38 · 34.3% (23 of 67 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.40 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.41 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.34 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.36 · 37.3% (25 of 67 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.41 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.39 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.30 · 50.7% (34 of 67 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.41 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.37 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.40 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.38 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.29 · 49.3% (33 of 67 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.34 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.33 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.34 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.31 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.36 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.33 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Lashweed Lurker relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.27 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.35 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.32 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.31 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.33 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.35 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.33 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.34 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.31 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.31 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Mockery of Nature relevance 0.36 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.32 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 0.32 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.26 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Decimator of the Provinces relevance 0.34 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 0.34 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.31 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.35 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.29 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.23 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.26 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Darksteel Monolith relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.17 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.16 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.15 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 38.8% (26 of 67 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Mana Geode relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Planar Gate relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Chaos Wand relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.31 · 47.8% (32 of 67 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.33 · 37.3% (25 of 67 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.31 · 40.3% (27 of 67 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.29 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.30 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.24 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.32 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.17 · 47.8% (32 of 67 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.21 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Emrakul's Influence relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.26 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- In Bolas's Clutches relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.19 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Lay Claim relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Weftwalking relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.17 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- From Beyond relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Fae Flight relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Cradle of Safety relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Maze's Mantle relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.36 · 38.8% (26 of 67 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.40 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.32 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.32 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.32 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.29 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Rowdy Research relevance 0.32 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 0.32 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.32 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.25 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.28 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.24 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.25 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Whirlwind Technique relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.19 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Spelljack relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Prying Eyes relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Will of the Naga relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Desecrate Reality relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Summoning Trap relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.16 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Transcendent Message relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.15 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.10 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.11 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.12 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.12 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.12 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.35 · 37.3% (25 of 67 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.37 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.35 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.34 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.33 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.26 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.34 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.31 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.30 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.24 · 34.3% (23 of 67 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.28 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.27 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.18 · 56.7% (38 of 67 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 73.1% (49 of 67 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.27 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.29 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Read the Tides relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Spitting Image relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.20 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (17)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.24 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Mu Yanling relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Nissa, Genesis Mage relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.13 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.11 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.10 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.10 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.10 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.32 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.31 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.28 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.26 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.21 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.23 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.23 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.20 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.17 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.16 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.15 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Centaur Garden relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.17 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.13 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.15 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Ominous Cemetery relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.13 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 44.8% (30 of 67 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.14 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
All lands (50)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.30 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.28 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.26 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.25 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.19 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.18 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.18 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.19 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.18 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Snow-Covered Wastes relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.12 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 59.7% (40 of 67 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.11 · 41.8% (28 of 67 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.13 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.15 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.13 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 38.8% (26 of 67 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 49.3% (33 of 67 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 64.2% (43 of 67 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.07 · 64.2% (43 of 67 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.12 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (4 of 67 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (5 of 67 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
- Tarnation Vista relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Archaeological Dig relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Rupture Spire relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.15 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty, from 67 real Commander decks.