Cards like Garruk's Uprising
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Garruk's Uprising 62%
- Elemental Bond 34%
- Kavu Lair 2%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 40%
- Three Visits 34%
- Skyshroud Claim 26%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 8%
- Glimpse the Core 4%
- Hunting Wilds 2%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
4.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 26%
- Mana Reflection 16%
Cards like Apex Devastator
16× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 64% of other green decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 47% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.6 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 48%
- Kodama's Reach 46%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Traverse the Outlands 14%
- Grow from the Ashes 6%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Map the Frontier 4%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Beneath the Sands 2%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Migration Path, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, Boundless Realms, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 60% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 46% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.5 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 54%
- Elvish Mystic 40%
- Fyndhorn Elves 36%
- Llanowar Tribe 28%
- Golden Hind 4%
- Boreal Druid 2%
- Druid of the Cowl 2%
- Goobbue Gardener 2%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Reclamation Sage
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Foundation Breaker, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists
Cards like Sol Ring
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other green decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 74%
- Grim Monolith 4%
- Basalt Monolith 4%
- Mana Vault 4%
Cards like Apex Altisaur
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Pheres-Band Brawler, Atzocan Archer, Somberwald Stag
Cards like Wild Growth
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Shimmerwilds Growth, Fertile Ground
Cards like Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma
2.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Malamet Brawler, Eel-Hounds, Fangren Pathcutter, Master Symmetrist
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Colossal Majesty
9.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 24%
- Lightning Greaves 18%
Cards like Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger
4.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Raucous Audience
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
2.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.21 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.17 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.20 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.19 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Ogre's Cleaver relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.19 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.17 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Sorcerer's Broom relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.20 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.21 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.17 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.15 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.20 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.17 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.15 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.15 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Village Elder relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Boom Box relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Verdant Haven relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.18 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.17 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.15 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Runed Servitor relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.16 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.16 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Wreath of Geists relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Tranquil Path relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.17 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.17 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Sylvok Replica relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.18 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Skyship Weatherlight relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Attended Socialite relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.15 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.16 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.21 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.17 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.20 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.19 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.19 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.17 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Sorcerer's Broom relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.20 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.21 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.17 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.15 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.20 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.17 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.15 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Village Elder relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.18 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.17 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Runed Servitor relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.16 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.17 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.17 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Sylvok Replica relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.18 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Attended Socialite relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.16 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Arcbound Worker relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Scaled Behemoth relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.15 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.15 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Elegant Entourage relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.13 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.15 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.12 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ogre's Cleaver relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Boom Box relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Skyship Weatherlight relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.14 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.12 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.11 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Traveler's Amulet relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Boompile relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.14 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Vexing Arcanix relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Leonin Bladetrap relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Psychogenic Probe relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Whirling Catapult relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Heirloom Epic relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Misers' Cage relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Thought Prison relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Jinxed Ring relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Dingus Staff relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Dingus Egg relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Talon of Pain relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ebony Owl Netsuke relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Heavy Arbalest relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Magnetic Mine relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ankh of Mishra relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Black Vise relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Entrancing Lyre relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Sorcerer's Wand relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Iron Maiden relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Time Bomb relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Gold Pan relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.07 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.09 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Genesis Chamber relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.15 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Verdant Haven relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.15 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.16 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Wreath of Geists relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.16 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.13 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.12 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- A Realm Reborn relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Aid from the Cowl relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.09 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Fortitude relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Gardenize relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Maddening Wind relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.10 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Family's Favor relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Bonds of Mortality relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Druid's Call relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Thelon's Chant relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Wanderlust relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.12 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.12 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.12 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Gift of the Woods relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Cyclone relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.09 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Vivien's Talent relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Tranquil Grove relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- The Hunger Tide Rises relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Spawning Grounds relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
All instants (50)
- Luxurious Libation relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.12 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Slice in Twain relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.14 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Defend the Hearth relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.12 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.11 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.10 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Howling Gale relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Withstand Death relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.08 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.10 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.12 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Savage Summoning relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.09 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.09 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.09 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Hornet Sting relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Storm Seeker relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.09 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.06 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Return to the Earth relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.09 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.09 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Untamed Might relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Huatli's Final Strike relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.08 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Tanglesap relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Chorus of Might relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Summoning Trap relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Tandem Takedown relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.08 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Tribute to the Wild relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Tranquil Path relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.11 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
- Commune with Spirits relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.14 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.12 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.12 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Bramblecrush relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Overwhelming Encounter relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Lay of the Land relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.10 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.13 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Commune with Nature relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.12 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.10 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Unyaro Bee Sting relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Typhoon relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.12 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Wing Storm relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.08 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Bee Sting relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.12 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Canopy Surge relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.08 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.10 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Claws of Wirewood relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Culling Mark relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Stomp and Howl relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.07 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.11 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Winter Blast relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (20)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.15 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.14 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Vivien, Arkbow Ranger relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Genesis Mage relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Vivien of the Arkbow relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Garruk, Savage Herald relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Vivien, Nature's Avenger relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.06 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Sequestered Stash relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.16 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.11 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.12 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.13 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.11 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.10 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.10 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.11 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.10 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.09 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Big Apple, 3 a.m. relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Tower of the Magistrate relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.09 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.09 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Chocobo Camp relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.06 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.08 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Radiant Fountain relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
All lands (32)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.16 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.13 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.11 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.09 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.10 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Grand Coliseum relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.10 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Undiscovered Paradise relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.08 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.07 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.07 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.05 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.05 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.04 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.04 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.04 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 92.0% (46 of 50 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger, from 50 real Commander partner decks.