Gift of the Woods

Played in 355 decks

Gift of the Woods
$0.17 €0.13

Change per day

Commanders

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
All commanders (28)
  1. Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 2.36 · 4.5% (15 of 332 decks)
  2. Kaima, the Fractured Calm relevance 2.05 · 1.4% (12 of 878 decks)
  3. Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.84 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
  4. Titanbones, Towering Heart relevance 1.68 · 3.6% (7 of 193 decks)
  5. Kaysa relevance 1.61 · 6.0% (5 of 84 decks)
  6. Lord Dregg, Insect Invader relevance 1.25 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
  7. Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.13 · 11.8% (2 of 17 decks)
  8. Isao, Enlightened Bushi relevance 1.05 · 2.7% (3 of 111 decks)
  9. Arcades Sabboth relevance 1.03 · 1.7% (2 of 121 decks)
  10. Tigra, Feline Fury relevance 0.89 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
  11. Tana, the Bloodsower // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.85 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
  12. Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.77 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
  13. Lord Magnus relevance 0.76 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
  14. Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar relevance 0.73 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
  15. Flatman relevance 0.64 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
  16. Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.63 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
  17. The Lady of the Mountain relevance 0.62 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
  18. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.61 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
  19. Lila, Hospitality Hostess relevance 0.61 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
  20. Reptil, Dinomorpher relevance 0.61 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
  21. Ragnar relevance 0.61 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
  22. Lady Zhurong, Warrior Queen relevance 0.56 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
  23. Autumn Willow relevance 0.52 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
  24. Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
  25. Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
  26. Fblthp, Knows the Way relevance 0.48 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
  27. Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.48 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
  28. Ka-Zar of the Savage Land relevance 0.43 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)

Parallel Cards

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
All parallel cards (6)
  1. Favor of the Woods
  2. Ferocity
  3. Noble Stand
  4. Retaliation
  5. Beastmaster's Magemark
  6. Luminous Wake

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Ferocity
    0.89 9.6%
    $0.20 €0.13
  • Forced Adaptation
    0.71 10.7%
    $0.21 €0.14
  • Carapace
    0.70 8.2%
    $0.16 €0.16
  • King Cheetah
    0.62 5.6%
    $0.14 €0.14
  • Overgrown Battlement
    0.60 11.5%
    $0.30 €0.51
  • Gift of Paradise
    0.60 9.6%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Regeneration
    0.60 7.6%
    $0.29 €0.25
  • Primal Frenzy
    0.60 6.5%
    $0.15 €0.16
  • Quiet Disrepair
    0.59 6.5%
    $0.13 €0.09
  • Spider Umbra
    0.58 9.3%
    $0.33 €0.40
All most relevant (30)
  1. Ferocity relevance 0.89 · 9.6% (34 of 355 decks)
  2. Forced Adaptation relevance 0.71 · 10.7% (38 of 355 decks)
  3. Carapace relevance 0.70 · 8.2% (29 of 355 decks)
  4. King Cheetah relevance 0.62 · 5.6% (20 of 355 decks)
  5. Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.60 · 11.5% (41 of 355 decks)
  6. Gift of Paradise relevance 0.60 · 9.6% (34 of 355 decks)
  7. Regeneration relevance 0.60 · 7.6% (27 of 355 decks)
  8. Primal Frenzy relevance 0.60 · 6.5% (23 of 355 decks)
  9. Quiet Disrepair relevance 0.59 · 6.5% (23 of 355 decks)
  10. Spider Umbra relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (33 of 355 decks)
  11. Predatory Hunger relevance 0.57 · 8.2% (29 of 355 decks)
  12. Bequeathal relevance 0.57 · 7.6% (27 of 355 decks)
  13. Rancor relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (47 of 355 decks)
  14. Wild Growth relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (62 of 355 decks)
  15. Shape the Sands relevance 0.55 · 6.2% (22 of 355 decks)
  16. Bestial Bloodline relevance 0.54 · 6.2% (22 of 355 decks)
  17. Spider Climb relevance 0.54 · 5.4% (19 of 355 decks)
  18. Enthralling Victor relevance 0.54 · 5.9% (21 of 355 decks)
  19. Frog Tongue relevance 0.54 · 7.0% (25 of 355 decks)
  20. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (82 of 355 decks)
  21. Track Down relevance 0.53 · 6.8% (24 of 355 decks)
  22. Dryad's Favor relevance 0.52 · 6.2% (22 of 355 decks)
  23. Ancestral Mask relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (35 of 355 decks)
  24. Skyshroud Elite relevance 0.51 · 5.1% (18 of 355 decks)
  25. Great Forest Druid relevance 0.50 · 9.6% (34 of 355 decks)
  26. Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.50 · 8.5% (30 of 355 decks)
  27. Fruit of the First Tree relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (24 of 355 decks)
  28. Crash of Rhinos relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (17 of 355 decks)
  29. Silken Strength relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (21 of 355 decks)
  30. Femeref Archers relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (19 of 355 decks)

Creatures

19

Showing 1-10 of 19

Page size
  • King Cheetah
    0.62 5.6%
    $0.14 €0.14
  • Overgrown Battlement
    0.60 11.5%
    $0.30 €0.51
  • Enthralling Victor
    0.54 5.9%
    $0.13 €0.12
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.53 23.1%
    $0.24 €0.21
  • Skyshroud Elite
    0.51 5.1%
    $0.38 €0.97
  • Great Forest Druid
    0.50 9.6%
    $0.25 €0.13
  • Jaddi Offshoot
    0.50 8.5%
    $0.27 €0.24
  • Crash of Rhinos
    0.48 4.8%
    $0.19 €0.13
  • Femeref Archers
    0.48 5.4%
    $0.14 €0.13
  • Sylvan Brushstrider
    0.47 4.5%
    $0.13 €0.06
All creatures (19)
  1. King Cheetah relevance 0.62 · 5.6% (20 of 355 decks)
  2. Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.60 · 11.5% (41 of 355 decks)
  3. Enthralling Victor relevance 0.54 · 5.9% (21 of 355 decks)
  4. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (82 of 355 decks)
  5. Skyshroud Elite relevance 0.51 · 5.1% (18 of 355 decks)
  6. Great Forest Druid relevance 0.50 · 9.6% (34 of 355 decks)
  7. Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.50 · 8.5% (30 of 355 decks)
  8. Crash of Rhinos relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (17 of 355 decks)
  9. Femeref Archers relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (19 of 355 decks)
  10. Sylvan Brushstrider relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (16 of 355 decks)
  11. Pharika's Disciple relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (17 of 355 decks)
  12. Rampaging Rendhorn relevance 0.46 · 4.5% (16 of 355 decks)
  13. Siege Wurm relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (19 of 355 decks)
  14. Boneyard Wurm relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (21 of 355 decks)
  15. Broodhunter Wurm relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (17 of 355 decks)
  16. Greater Basilisk relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (17 of 355 decks)
  17. Tapestry Warden relevance 0.44 · 5.9% (21 of 355 decks)
  18. Almighty Brushwagg relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (18 of 355 decks)
  19. Lurking Roper relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (16 of 355 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Rosethorn Halberd
    0.47 5.1%
    $0.08 €0.05
All artifacts (1)
  1. Rosethorn Halberd relevance 0.47 · 5.1% (18 of 355 decks)

Enchantments

23

Showing 1-10 of 23

Page size
  • Ferocity
    0.89 9.6%
    $0.20 €0.13
  • Forced Adaptation
    0.71 10.7%
    $0.21 €0.14
  • Carapace
    0.70 8.2%
    $0.16 €0.16
  • Gift of Paradise
    0.60 9.6%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Regeneration
    0.60 7.6%
    $0.29 €0.25
  • Primal Frenzy
    0.60 6.5%
    $0.15 €0.16
  • Quiet Disrepair
    0.59 6.5%
    $0.13 €0.09
  • Spider Umbra
    0.58 9.3%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Predatory Hunger
    0.57 8.2%
    $0.65 €0.48
  • Bequeathal
    0.57 7.6%
    $0.68 €0.76
All enchantments (23)
  1. Ferocity relevance 0.89 · 9.6% (34 of 355 decks)
  2. Forced Adaptation relevance 0.71 · 10.7% (38 of 355 decks)
  3. Carapace relevance 0.70 · 8.2% (29 of 355 decks)
  4. Gift of Paradise relevance 0.60 · 9.6% (34 of 355 decks)
  5. Regeneration relevance 0.60 · 7.6% (27 of 355 decks)
  6. Primal Frenzy relevance 0.60 · 6.5% (23 of 355 decks)
  7. Quiet Disrepair relevance 0.59 · 6.5% (23 of 355 decks)
  8. Spider Umbra relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (33 of 355 decks)
  9. Predatory Hunger relevance 0.57 · 8.2% (29 of 355 decks)
  10. Bequeathal relevance 0.57 · 7.6% (27 of 355 decks)
  11. Rancor relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (47 of 355 decks)
  12. Wild Growth relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (62 of 355 decks)
  13. Bestial Bloodline relevance 0.54 · 6.2% (22 of 355 decks)
  14. Spider Climb relevance 0.54 · 5.4% (19 of 355 decks)
  15. Frog Tongue relevance 0.54 · 7.0% (25 of 355 decks)
  16. Dryad's Favor relevance 0.52 · 6.2% (22 of 355 decks)
  17. Ancestral Mask relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (35 of 355 decks)
  18. Fruit of the First Tree relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (24 of 355 decks)
  19. Silken Strength relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (21 of 355 decks)
  20. Abundant Growth relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (34 of 355 decks)
  21. War Dance relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (15 of 355 decks)
  22. The Brute relevance 0.44 · 4.8% (17 of 355 decks)
  23. Keen Sense relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (29 of 355 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Shape the Sands
    0.55 6.2%
    $0.06 €0.09
  • Biosynthic Burst
    0.46 8.5%
    $0.27 €0.10
  • Fog
    0.46 11.5%
    $1.02 €0.25
  • Return to Nature
    0.46 10.7%
    $0.31 €0.20
  • Giant Growth
    0.45 8.5%
    $0.20 €0.08
All instants (5)
  1. Shape the Sands relevance 0.55 · 6.2% (22 of 355 decks)
  2. Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.46 · 8.5% (30 of 355 decks)
  3. Fog relevance 0.46 · 11.5% (41 of 355 decks)
  4. Return to Nature relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (38 of 355 decks)
  5. Giant Growth relevance 0.45 · 8.5% (30 of 355 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Track Down
    0.53 6.8%
    $0.22 €0.08
  • Cultivate
    0.46 26.2%
    $0.43 €0.50
All sorceries (2)
  1. Track Down relevance 0.53 · 6.8% (24 of 355 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.46 · 26.2% (93 of 355 decks)

EDH data for Gift of the Woods: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 355 real decks.