Nostalgic Dreams
Played in 69 Temur decks
230+16+6+7+2+7+7+5+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Trade Routes 20.3% of decks
Trade Routes 20.3% of decks
Surly Badgersaur 21.7% of decks
Surly Badgersaur 21.7% of decks
Slogurk, the Overslime 18.8% of decks
Slogurk, the Overslime 18.8% of decks
Life from the Loam 24.6% of decks
Life from the Loam 24.6% of decks
Monument to Endurance 20.3% of decks
Monument to Endurance 20.3% of decks
Mystic Retrieval 15.9% of decks
Mystic Retrieval 15.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.66 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Martha Jones // The Fugitive Doctor relevance 0.45 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Trade Routes relevance 1.10 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
- Surly Badgersaur relevance 1.07 · 21.7% (15 of 69 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.03 · 18.8% (13 of 69 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.02 · 24.6% (17 of 69 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.97 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
- Mystic Retrieval relevance 0.92 · 15.9% (11 of 69 decks)
- Glint-Horn Buccaneer relevance 0.92 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.90 · 15.9% (11 of 69 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.90 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Magmakin Artillerist relevance 0.84 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Rielle, the Everwise relevance 0.80 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.79 · 23.2% (16 of 69 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.78 · 29.0% (20 of 69 decks)
- Captain Howler, Sea Scourge relevance 0.77 · 13.0% (9 of 69 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.72 · 27.5% (19 of 69 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.70 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Case of the Crimson Pulse relevance 0.70 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Shadow of the Goblin relevance 0.68 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Manabond relevance 0.65 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Null Brooch relevance 0.64 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.64 · 13.0% (9 of 69 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.62 · 24.6% (17 of 69 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.60 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.57 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (11 of 69 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.54 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.53 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Surly Badgersaur relevance 1.07 · 21.7% (15 of 69 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.03 · 18.8% (13 of 69 decks)
- Glint-Horn Buccaneer relevance 0.92 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
- Magmakin Artillerist relevance 0.84 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Rielle, the Everwise relevance 0.80 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.79 · 23.2% (16 of 69 decks)
- Captain Howler, Sea Scourge relevance 0.77 · 13.0% (9 of 69 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.72 · 27.5% (19 of 69 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.60 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.54 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.51 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.48 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 0.47 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.97 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
- Null Brooch relevance 0.64 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.64 · 13.0% (9 of 69 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (11 of 69 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.53 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.48 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Trade Routes relevance 1.10 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.78 · 29.0% (20 of 69 decks)
- Case of the Crimson Pulse relevance 0.70 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Shadow of the Goblin relevance 0.68 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Manabond relevance 0.65 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.62 · 24.6% (17 of 69 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.48 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
All instants (2)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.90 · 14.5% (10 of 69 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.48 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.02 · 24.6% (17 of 69 decks)
- Mystic Retrieval relevance 0.92 · 15.9% (11 of 69 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.90 · 15.9% (11 of 69 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.70 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.57 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.49 · 23.2% (16 of 69 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.67 · 26.1% (18 of 69 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.67 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.66 · 27.5% (19 of 69 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.59 · 13.0% (9 of 69 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.51 · 21.7% (15 of 69 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.49 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.46 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
All lands (5)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.68 · 33.3% (23 of 69 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.56 · 24.6% (17 of 69 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.53 · 24.6% (17 of 69 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.47 · 39.1% (27 of 69 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.47 · 20.3% (14 of 69 decks)
EDH data for Nostalgic Dreams: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 69 real decks.


















































