Nostalgic Dreams
Played in 207 Sultai decks
230+22+5+8+9+3+3+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Thirst for Discovery 19.3% of decks
Thirst for Discovery 19.3% of decks
Frantic Search 41.1% of decks
Frantic Search 41.1% of decks
Thirst for Knowledge 16.4% of decks
Thirst for Knowledge 16.4% of decks
Impervious Greatwurm 17.4% of decks
Impervious Greatwurm 17.4% of decks
Thirst for Meaning 13.5% of decks
Thirst for Meaning 13.5% of decks
Nezahal, Primal Tide 19.8% of decks
Nezahal, Primal Tide 19.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 2.07 · 1.4% (51 of 3,730 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 2.04 · 1.9% (32 of 1,678 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 1.06 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.02 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.91 · 16.4% (34 of 207 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.91 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (28 of 207 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.85 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Champion of Wits relevance 0.83 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.79 · 20.3% (42 of 207 decks)
- Tyrranax Rex relevance 0.77 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.76 · 26.1% (54 of 207 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.75 · 26.6% (55 of 207 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.74 · 18.8% (39 of 207 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.74 · 21.7% (45 of 207 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.72 · 33.3% (69 of 207 decks)
- Hermit Druid relevance 0.71 · 25.6% (53 of 207 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.70 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Bog Witch relevance 0.66 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (35 of 207 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.66 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.63 · 31.4% (65 of 207 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Skirge Familiar relevance 0.62 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.62 · 34.8% (72 of 207 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.61 · 22.7% (47 of 207 decks)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.61 · 31.4% (65 of 207 decks)
- Bone Miser relevance 0.60 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.59 · 32.9% (68 of 207 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.59 · 40.6% (84 of 207 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.91 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.85 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Champion of Wits relevance 0.83 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.79 · 20.3% (42 of 207 decks)
- Tyrranax Rex relevance 0.77 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.75 · 26.6% (55 of 207 decks)
- Hermit Druid relevance 0.71 · 25.6% (53 of 207 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.70 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Bog Witch relevance 0.66 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.66 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Skirge Familiar relevance 0.62 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.61 · 22.7% (47 of 207 decks)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Bone Miser relevance 0.60 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Archfiend of Ifnir relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Skithiryx, the Blight Dragon relevance 0.58 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.58 · 37.2% (77 of 207 decks)
- Body Double relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (30 of 207 decks)
- Underrealm Lich relevance 0.55 · 18.8% (39 of 207 decks)
- Death's Shadow relevance 0.55 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Necromancy relevance 0.74 · 21.7% (45 of 207 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.72 · 33.3% (69 of 207 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.61 · 31.4% (65 of 207 decks)
- Manabond relevance 0.56 · 9.2% (19 of 207 decks)
- Zombie Infestation relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
All instants (8)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 1.06 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.02 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.91 · 16.4% (34 of 207 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (28 of 207 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (35 of 207 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.58 · 23.2% (48 of 207 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.56 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 0.54 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Windfall relevance 0.76 · 26.1% (54 of 207 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.74 · 18.8% (39 of 207 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.63 · 31.4% (65 of 207 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.62 · 34.8% (72 of 207 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.59 · 32.9% (68 of 207 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.59 · 40.6% (84 of 207 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.54 · 11.6% (24 of 207 decks)
- Healing Technique relevance 0.54 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.83 · 33.3% (69 of 207 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.68 · 28.5% (59 of 207 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.53 · 30.0% (62 of 207 decks)
All lands (3)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.59 · 20.8% (43 of 207 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.54 · 34.3% (71 of 207 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.54 · 42.0% (87 of 207 decks)
EDH data for Nostalgic Dreams: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 207 real decks.














































