Undergrowth Champion
Played in 238 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
330+41+1+5+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Amareth, the Lustrous relevance 1.06 · 1.2% (10 of 839 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Captain Kirk, Boldly Going relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.67 · 60.5% (144 of 238 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.58 · 44.1% (105 of 238 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.55 · 37.0% (88 of 238 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.48 · 51.3% (122 of 238 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.38 · 37.4% (89 of 238 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.30 · 35.7% (85 of 238 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.16 · 30.3% (72 of 238 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.14 · 16.8% (40 of 238 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.10 · 23.5% (56 of 238 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.07 · 21.8% (52 of 238 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 1.00 · 32.8% (78 of 238 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.95 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.95 · 13.9% (33 of 238 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 30.7% (73 of 238 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.93 · 24.4% (58 of 238 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.92 · 17.2% (41 of 238 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 0.89 · 13.4% (32 of 238 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.87 · 17.6% (42 of 238 decks)
- Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 0.83 · 14.7% (35 of 238 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.83 · 29.0% (69 of 238 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.80 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 21.0% (50 of 238 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 0.77 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.75 · 17.2% (41 of 238 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (33 of 238 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.72 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Glyph Elemental relevance 0.72 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.71 · 19.3% (46 of 238 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (40 of 238 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.67 · 60.5% (144 of 238 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.58 · 44.1% (105 of 238 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.55 · 37.0% (88 of 238 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.38 · 37.4% (89 of 238 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.30 · 35.7% (85 of 238 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.16 · 30.3% (72 of 238 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.14 · 16.8% (40 of 238 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.10 · 23.5% (56 of 238 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 1.00 · 32.8% (78 of 238 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.95 · 15.5% (37 of 238 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 30.7% (73 of 238 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.93 · 24.4% (58 of 238 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.92 · 17.2% (41 of 238 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 0.89 · 13.4% (32 of 238 decks)
- Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 0.83 · 14.7% (35 of 238 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.83 · 29.0% (69 of 238 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.80 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 21.0% (50 of 238 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 0.77 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (33 of 238 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.72 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Glyph Elemental relevance 0.72 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.71 · 19.3% (46 of 238 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.70 · 16.8% (40 of 238 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.67 · 15.1% (36 of 238 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.66 · 17.6% (42 of 238 decks)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.66 · 19.7% (47 of 238 decks)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.64 · 12.6% (30 of 238 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.64 · 18.5% (44 of 238 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.64 · 20.2% (48 of 238 decks)
- Six relevance 0.64 · 13.0% (31 of 238 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.64 · 16.0% (38 of 238 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (23 of 238 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.61 · 21.8% (52 of 238 decks)
- Fearless Fledgling relevance 0.61 · 8.8% (21 of 238 decks)
- Selfless Spirit relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (39 of 238 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.60 · 11.8% (28 of 238 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.60 · 10.9% (26 of 238 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (32 of 238 decks)
- Sharp-Eyed Rookie relevance 0.59 · 9.2% (22 of 238 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.95 · 13.9% (33 of 238 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.48 · 51.3% (122 of 238 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.07 · 21.8% (52 of 238 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.87 · 17.6% (42 of 238 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.75 · 17.2% (41 of 238 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (40 of 238 decks)
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.76 · 54.2% (129 of 238 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.68 · 23.1% (55 of 238 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.68 · 35.3% (84 of 238 decks)
EDH data for Undergrowth Champion: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 238 real decks.

































