Rumbleweed
Played in 4,050 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
28.4% Naya
All commanders (6)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 5.48 · 67.1% (2,471 of 3,682 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 4.30 · 52.7% (692 of 1,314 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.10 · 18.0% (777 of 4,310 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.25 · 1.5% (7 of 468 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.15 · 1.1% (4 of 368 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dune Chanter relevance 3.00 · 92.8% (3,758 of 4,050 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 2.64 · 75.0% (3,039 of 4,050 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 2.58 · 59.1% (2,395 of 4,050 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.55 · 60.6% (2,455 of 4,050 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 2.53 · 68.1% (2,759 of 4,050 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.45 · 68.8% (2,787 of 4,050 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 2.39 · 57.0% (2,310 of 4,050 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.36 · 70.9% (2,871 of 4,050 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 2.33 · 55.9% (2,265 of 4,050 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 2.30 · 51.7% (2,093 of 4,050 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.27 · 60.2% (2,438 of 4,050 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.26 · 69.5% (2,816 of 4,050 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.20 · 66.9% (2,711 of 4,050 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 2.19 · 47.8% (1,937 of 4,050 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 2.17 · 50.5% (2,047 of 4,050 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.16 · 46.8% (1,895 of 4,050 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 2.14 · 76.3% (3,089 of 4,050 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.95 · 52.3% (2,118 of 4,050 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 1.94 · 47.7% (1,931 of 4,050 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.94 · 73.3% (2,970 of 4,050 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.91 · 52.9% (2,142 of 4,050 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.83 · 39.7% (1,609 of 4,050 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 1.78 · 38.2% (1,548 of 4,050 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.74 · 58.3% (2,361 of 4,050 decks)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 1.73 · 40.2% (1,628 of 4,050 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 1.65 · 32.9% (1,332 of 4,050 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 1.64 · 33.4% (1,354 of 4,050 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 1.62 · 32.8% (1,330 of 4,050 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 1.56 · 34.1% (1,383 of 4,050 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 1.55 · 44.6% (1,805 of 4,050 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Dune Chanter relevance 3.00 · 92.8% (3,758 of 4,050 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.55 · 60.6% (2,455 of 4,050 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 2.53 · 68.1% (2,759 of 4,050 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.45 · 68.8% (2,787 of 4,050 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.36 · 70.9% (2,871 of 4,050 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 2.33 · 55.9% (2,265 of 4,050 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.26 · 69.5% (2,816 of 4,050 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.20 · 66.9% (2,711 of 4,050 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 2.19 · 47.8% (1,937 of 4,050 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.16 · 46.8% (1,895 of 4,050 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 2.14 · 76.3% (3,089 of 4,050 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.91 · 52.9% (2,142 of 4,050 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.83 · 39.7% (1,609 of 4,050 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.74 · 58.3% (2,361 of 4,050 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 1.53 · 32.0% (1,294 of 4,050 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.49 · 35.1% (1,423 of 4,050 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.47 · 63.6% (2,575 of 4,050 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 1.62 · 32.8% (1,330 of 4,050 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.95 · 52.3% (2,118 of 4,050 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 1.94 · 47.7% (1,931 of 4,050 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 1.65 · 32.9% (1,332 of 4,050 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 1.56 · 34.1% (1,383 of 4,050 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 1.94 · 73.3% (2,970 of 4,050 decks)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 1.73 · 40.2% (1,628 of 4,050 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Map the Frontier relevance 2.64 · 75.0% (3,039 of 4,050 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 2.58 · 59.1% (2,395 of 4,050 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 2.39 · 57.0% (2,310 of 4,050 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 2.30 · 51.7% (2,093 of 4,050 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.27 · 60.2% (2,438 of 4,050 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 2.17 · 50.5% (2,047 of 4,050 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 1.78 · 38.2% (1,548 of 4,050 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 1.64 · 33.4% (1,354 of 4,050 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 1.55 · 44.6% (1,805 of 4,050 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.49 · 38.0% (1,537 of 4,050 decks)
All utility lands (11)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 3.00 · 86.7% (3,512 of 4,050 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 2.87 · 85.1% (3,445 of 4,050 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 2.85 · 84.3% (3,413 of 4,050 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 2.85 · 83.8% (3,395 of 4,050 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 2.83 · 83.2% (3,371 of 4,050 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 2.81 · 82.1% (3,324 of 4,050 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 2.78 · 81.2% (3,290 of 4,050 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 2.76 · 79.0% (3,201 of 4,050 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 2.74 · 78.5% (3,181 of 4,050 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.83 · 50.0% (2,025 of 4,050 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.65 · 74.0% (2,999 of 4,050 decks)
All lands (5)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 2.68 · 84.8% (3,433 of 4,050 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 2.68 · 76.2% (3,088 of 4,050 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 2.67 · 84.3% (3,416 of 4,050 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 2.62 · 82.4% (3,336 of 4,050 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 2.56 · 69.5% (2,816 of 4,050 decks)
EDH data for Rumbleweed: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,050 real decks.