Planetary Annihilation
Played in 481 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Naya
- Jund 18,102 · 79.8%
- Red 1,022 · 4.5%
- Gruul 788 · 3.5%
- Rakdos 551 · 2.4%
- Naya 481 · 2.1%
- Other (18) 1,740 · 7.7%
All commanders (2)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.89 · 4.0% (148 of 3,689 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.12 · 2.1% (93 of 4,327 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.65 · 50.9% (245 of 481 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.52 · 45.5% (219 of 481 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.46 · 39.3% (189 of 481 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.46 · 39.1% (188 of 481 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.41 · 38.0% (183 of 481 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.39 · 32.6% (157 of 481 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.38 · 39.3% (189 of 481 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.36 · 34.3% (165 of 481 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.35 · 30.4% (146 of 481 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.31 · 39.9% (192 of 481 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.28 · 42.8% (206 of 481 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 1.27 · 28.3% (136 of 481 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.24 · 29.5% (142 of 481 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.23 · 46.6% (224 of 481 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.23 · 31.4% (151 of 481 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (160 of 481 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 36.2% (174 of 481 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.13 · 31.4% (151 of 481 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.05 · 40.3% (194 of 481 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.04 · 25.4% (122 of 481 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (178 of 481 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.03 · 27.4% (132 of 481 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.01 · 27.9% (134 of 481 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (114 of 481 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.96 · 18.5% (89 of 481 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.96 · 28.9% (139 of 481 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 29.9% (144 of 481 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 0.95 · 22.2% (107 of 481 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.95 · 33.3% (160 of 481 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 36.2% (174 of 481 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.65 · 50.9% (245 of 481 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.52 · 45.5% (219 of 481 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.41 · 38.0% (183 of 481 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.39 · 32.6% (157 of 481 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.35 · 30.4% (146 of 481 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.31 · 39.9% (192 of 481 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.28 · 42.8% (206 of 481 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.24 · 29.5% (142 of 481 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (160 of 481 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 36.2% (174 of 481 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.13 · 31.4% (151 of 481 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.04 · 25.4% (122 of 481 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (178 of 481 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.01 · 27.9% (134 of 481 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (114 of 481 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.96 · 18.5% (89 of 481 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 29.9% (144 of 481 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.95 · 33.3% (160 of 481 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 36.2% (174 of 481 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.46 · 39.1% (188 of 481 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.05 · 40.3% (194 of 481 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.46 · 39.3% (189 of 481 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.96 · 28.9% (139 of 481 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 1.23 · 46.6% (224 of 481 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.38 · 39.3% (189 of 481 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.36 · 34.3% (165 of 481 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 1.27 · 28.3% (136 of 481 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.23 · 31.4% (151 of 481 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.03 · 27.4% (132 of 481 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 0.95 · 22.2% (107 of 481 decks)
All utility lands (14)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.65 · 48.6% (234 of 481 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.64 · 48.6% (234 of 481 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.64 · 48.2% (232 of 481 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.64 · 47.8% (230 of 481 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.63 · 47.6% (229 of 481 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.62 · 47.8% (230 of 481 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.51 · 43.2% (208 of 481 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.48 · 42.6% (205 of 481 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.47 · 42.2% (203 of 481 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.44 · 39.3% (189 of 481 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.08 · 29.9% (144 of 481 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.08 · 26.0% (125 of 481 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 0.97 · 23.5% (113 of 481 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.90 · 40.5% (195 of 481 decks)
All lands (6)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.54 · 48.6% (234 of 481 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.54 · 48.6% (234 of 481 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.49 · 42.4% (204 of 481 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.47 · 46.4% (223 of 481 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.32 · 35.8% (172 of 481 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.08 · 28.3% (136 of 481 decks)
EDH data for Planetary Annihilation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 481 real decks.