Cephalid Scout
Played in 32 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
10.8% Simic
All commanders (1)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.60 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
All most relevant (25)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.67 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Excavation relevance 1.66 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.45 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.26 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.17 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.99 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.94 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.90 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.89 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 0.87 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.87 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.85 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.80 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.71 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.70 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.65 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.59 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.57 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.53 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.46 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.40 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.39 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.67 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.45 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.99 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.94 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.90 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.89 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 0.87 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.85 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.80 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.71 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.70 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.59 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.57 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.53 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.46 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.39 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Excavation relevance 1.66 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
All instants (4)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.26 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.17 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.87 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Explore relevance 0.65 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.40 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
All lands (2)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.52 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.50 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Scout: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 32 real decks.