Cephalid Scout
Played in 127 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
43.1% Blue
All commanders (5)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 5.63 · 55.6% (90 of 162 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.49 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.66 · 1.7% (2 of 115 decks)
- Beetle, Legacy Criminal relevance 0.64 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 5.18 · 82.7% (105 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 5.03 · 75.6% (96 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 4.64 · 80.3% (102 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 4.43 · 71.7% (91 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.79 · 77.2% (98 of 127 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.73 · 67.7% (86 of 127 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.61 · 68.5% (87 of 127 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 3.22 · 55.1% (70 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.99 · 52.8% (67 of 127 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.90 · 48.0% (61 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.78 · 56.7% (72 of 127 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.47 · 44.1% (56 of 127 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.39 · 49.6% (63 of 127 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 2.35 · 55.1% (70 of 127 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.94 · 37.8% (48 of 127 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.91 · 40.2% (51 of 127 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.82 · 32.3% (41 of 127 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.76 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.76 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.75 · 51.2% (65 of 127 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.61 · 29.1% (37 of 127 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.60 · 51.2% (65 of 127 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.59 · 30.7% (39 of 127 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.51 · 27.6% (35 of 127 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.48 · 41.7% (53 of 127 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.25 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.23 · 37.8% (48 of 127 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.23 · 24.4% (31 of 127 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 1.22 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 5.18 · 82.7% (105 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 5.03 · 75.6% (96 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 4.64 · 80.3% (102 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 4.43 · 71.7% (91 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.79 · 77.2% (98 of 127 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.73 · 67.7% (86 of 127 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.61 · 68.5% (87 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.99 · 52.8% (67 of 127 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.78 · 56.7% (72 of 127 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.47 · 44.1% (56 of 127 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.94 · 37.8% (48 of 127 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.91 · 40.2% (51 of 127 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.76 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.75 · 51.2% (65 of 127 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.60 · 51.2% (65 of 127 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.51 · 27.6% (35 of 127 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.25 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.23 · 37.8% (48 of 127 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.23 · 24.4% (31 of 127 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 1.22 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.17 · 18.9% (24 of 127 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.12 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 1.08 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.96 · 18.9% (24 of 127 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.95 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.87 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.79 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.66 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.61 · 29.1% (37 of 127 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 1.19 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.71 · 41.7% (53 of 127 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.90 · 48.0% (61 of 127 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 2.35 · 55.1% (70 of 127 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.82 · 32.3% (41 of 127 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.76 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.59 · 30.7% (39 of 127 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.93 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.79 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.77 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (22 of 127 decks)
All instants (3)
- Deluge relevance 0.93 · 17.3% (22 of 127 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.85 · 13.4% (17 of 127 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.70 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 3.22 · 55.1% (70 of 127 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.39 · 49.6% (63 of 127 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.48 · 41.7% (53 of 127 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.05 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 1.21 · 50.4% (64 of 127 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Scout: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 127 real decks.