Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 50%
- Fyndhorn Elves 50%
- Elvish Mystic 45%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Boreal Druid, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Rhystic Study
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 40%
- Mystic Remora 40%
Cards like Curiosity
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Wingspan Stride
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wingspan Stride 25%
- Arcane Flight 20%
- One With the Wind 15%
- Spectral Flight 15%
Other options: Hypnotic Siren, Lantern Bearer // Lanterns' Lift, Ghostly Wings
Cards like Curious Obsession
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Curious Obsession 30%
- Sixth Sense 30%
- Combat Research 30%
Cards like Spell Pierce
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 30%
- Force Spike 25%
- Mana Leak 25%
- Lose Focus 5%
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Make Disappear, Revolutionary Rebuff, Logic Knot, Metallic Rebuke, It'll Quench Ya!, Rethink, Don't Make a Sound, Quench
Cards like Force of Negation
4.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 50%
- Force of Will 35%
Cards like Neoform
20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Neoform 40%
- Eldritch Evolution 25%
Cards like Chrome Mox
5.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 30%
- Mox Diamond 25%
Cards like Peregrine Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Fading Hope
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fading Hope 20%
- Unsubstantiate 20%
Other options: Drag Under, Voyage's End, String of Disappearances, Galestrike, Stern Dismissal, Force Away, Repulse, Unsummon, Consuming Vortex, Ice Magic, Drown in Shapelessness, Symbol of Unsummoning, Arrester's Admonition, Select for Inspection, Escape Detection
Cards like Tale's End
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Counterspell
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 35%
- Spell Snare 25%
- Stern Scolding 25%
- Negate 15%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Manipulate Fate
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Manipulate Fate 20%
- Foresight 15%
Other options: Distant Memories, Mana Severance, Selective Memory
Cards like Birthing Pod
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Mental Misstep
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mental Misstep 50%
- Flusterstorm 15%
- Dispel 10%
- Miscast 5%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Opt
8.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Mystical Tutor
6.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Run Away Together
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Lotus Petal
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Volatile Stormdrake
10× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Volatile Stormdrake 30%
- Gilded Drake 10%
Cards like Fabricate
5.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fabricate 15%
- Scour for Scrap 5%
Cards like Worldly Tutor
4.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 30%
- Sylvan Tutor 5%
Cards like Eternal Witness
3.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Wild Growth
3.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 45%
- Fertile Ground 5%
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Overgrowth
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
3.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Tyvar's Stand
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Tyvar's Stand 30%
- Snakeskin Veil 5%
Other options: Blossoming Defense, Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit, Overprotect
Cards like Essence Flux
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Misdirection
2.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards like Tamiyo's Safekeeping
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Unstable Mutation relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Eternal Scourge relevance 0.35 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Misthollow Griffin relevance 0.34 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Embiggen relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Manipulate Fate relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Become Immense relevance 0.32 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.32 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.29 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.29 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.25 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.22 · 60.0% (12 of 20 decks)
- Wingspan Stride relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.28 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Secret Identity relevance 0.30 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Foresight relevance 0.31 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 0.28 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.25 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.25 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Spectral Flight relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Stitcher's Graft relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.22 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Stuffed Bear relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Falcon's Wing Harness relevance 0.25 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (10 of 20 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.22 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- One With the Wind relevance 0.25 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Nakia, Wakandan Operative relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Bearscape relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Druid's Familiar relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.20 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Eternal Scourge relevance 0.35 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Misthollow Griffin relevance 0.34 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Nakia, Wakandan Operative relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Druid's Familiar relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.20 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.20 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.18 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.21 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.18 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Werebear relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.19 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Caller of the Claw relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Evercoat Ursine relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (10 of 20 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.15 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.17 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.16 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.13 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.11 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Six relevance 0.14 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Lilysplash Mentor relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Ashcoat Bear relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Phantasmal Bear relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Mother Bear relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.13 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.13 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.08 · 55.0% (11 of 20 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.28 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.25 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Stitcher's Graft relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Stuffed Bear relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Falcon's Wing Harness relevance 0.25 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Forebear's Blade relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.14 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Hierophant's Chalice relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Saddle of the Cavalier relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Bear Trap relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Levitating Statue relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Hot Soup relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Runechanter's Pike relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Bone Saw relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Leather Armor relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Rogue's Gloves relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Aettir and Priwen relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Investigator's Journal relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Letter of Acceptance relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Witch's Oven relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Fishing Gear relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Fishing Pole relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Kaldra Compleat relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.10 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Shuko relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Bone Sabres relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Grindstone relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.09 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Unstable Mutation relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.29 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.29 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Wingspan Stride relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 0.28 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.25 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Spectral Flight relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.22 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- One With the Wind relevance 0.25 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Bearscape relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.15 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.15 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.11 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Bestial Bloodline relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Next of Kin relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Triumph of Ferocity relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Take Flight relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Sheltering Boughs relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Most Wanted relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Enigmatic Incarnation relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Fruit of the First Tree relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Font of Magic relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Cradle of Safety relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
All instants (50)
- Embiggen relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Become Immense relevance 0.32 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.32 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.22 · 60.0% (12 of 20 decks)
- Secret Identity relevance 0.30 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.22 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (10 of 20 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (10 of 20 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.17 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.17 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Mutagenic Growth relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.16 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.14 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.16 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.13 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.15 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.13 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.13 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.11 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.13 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Flourishing Grapple relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.13 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Manipulate Fate relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.25 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Foresight relevance 0.31 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Extract relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.15 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.14 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Grizzly Fate relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Forging the Anchor relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Ancestral Communion relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Caravan Vigil relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Pore Over the Pages relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Road of Return relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Genesis Storm relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Uncage the Menagerie relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Threats Undetected relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.06 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.09 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.09 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.09 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.07 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.08 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.07 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.05 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.09 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Centaur Garden relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.30 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.18 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 65.0% (13 of 20 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.19 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.11 · 60.0% (12 of 20 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.11 · 60.0% (12 of 20 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 65.0% (13 of 20 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.17 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (10 of 20 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.13 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.12 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.09 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.09 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.08 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.07 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.05 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.05 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.05 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.03 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
All lands (48)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.16 · 55.0% (11 of 20 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (10 of 20 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.13 · 55.0% (11 of 20 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.14 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 45.0% (9 of 20 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.09 · 65.0% (13 of 20 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.10 · 40.0% (8 of 20 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.09 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.11 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.11 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.06 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.10 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.09 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.10 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Valgavoth's Lair relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (10 of 20 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.05 · 65.0% (13 of 20 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.06 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.06 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.06 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.06 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.05 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.04 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.04 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.04 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.04 · 25.0% (5 of 20 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.04 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.03 · 35.0% (7 of 20 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.03 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.03 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 95.0% (19 of 20 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Candlekeep Sage, from 20 real Commander partner decks.